4.0 out of 5 stars
Still a Modernist Program, December 17, 2011
This review is from: Making Sense of New Testament Theology: "Modern" Problems and Prospects (Studies in American Biblical Hermeneutics) (Paperback)
For those turning to A.K.M. Adam, I believe this is a better written book than "Faithful Interpretation: Reading the Bible in a Postmodern World." However, it still lacks the force that I believe Adam intends it convey to his audience on the necessity of abandoning modernist commitments.
My reasons for seeing a lack of potency:
1. Although Adam disparages the modernist program, which he identifies as - a. commitment to the new, b. a preoccupation with time, c. an appeal to distinctive warrants, and d. dependence on the expert as authoritative over the non-expert- he never successfully distances himself from these same commitments in his approach. For example, the entire book is written in an academic style reminiscent of the modernist authorities. Not one chapter appears without footnotes, yet if we were to assume he was forming a new biblical theology not based on authority, then we would find a chapter devoid of the old methodology. This is just one of the methodological problems which lead me to believe Adam himself is still entrenched in modernity.
2. Adam does not adequately deal with the humanistic foundations of modernity. Postmodern ideas related to legitimacy and plurality may still pose a problem for those theologians and biblical scholars who see the fatal flaw of both modernism and postmodernism as an obsession with human concerns. In this sense, postmodernism is just the newest brand of modernism. Adam really does not even touch on this subject.
3. Issues of meaning and interpretations are purely and necessarily contextual for Adam. He understands this to mean that there is no transcendent meaning or interpretation to a text (e.g. pg. 178). This is a modernist presupposition. Why? Because it depends on the reality of human reason and rationality which are contextually driven and developed through social means to assent to the lack of transcendence. Postmodern thought is just the skeptical child of optimistic modernity.
Despite the problems with Adam's book, I would still highly recommend it. He articulately shows why he is abandoning what has been the majority approach to biblical theology in the last 100 years. My major problems with the book are of substance and presupposition, not of style or clarity. Chapter 1 "A Physiognomy of Modernity" is most helpful for understanding problems in recent (modernist) approaches in the field, and Chapter 5 "The Philosophical Erosion of Modernity" shows readers why some postmodernist readers are upset with the modernist program. I highly recommend these chapters to better understand the perspectives found within.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No