Mallrats [Paperback]

Kevin Smith (Author)

Product Details

• Paperback: 96 pages
• Publisher: Graphitti Designs (October 4, 2005)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0936211253
• ISBN-13: 978-0936211251
• Product Dimensions: 10.9 x 8.6 x 0.2 inches
• Shipping Weight: 9.6 ounces
• Average Customer Review: 4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,421,382 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars I loved this book/movie., July 5, 1998

By A Customer

This review is from: Mallrats (Paperback)

Although the movie really bombed at the box office, I still think Mallrats is almost the best of the Jersey Trilogy. The numbers were low, not very many people liked it, but it is a hilarious book/movie, and very enjoyable.

3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Mallrats rules!!!!, October 10, 1998

By A Customer

This review is from: Mallrats (Paperback)

The movie is hilarious, the book is hilarious, and to answer the Englishman's question (why was only one Clerks actor...). Well, excluding Jay and Silent Bob, there were three actors from Clerks. Brian O'Halloran (Dante in Clerks, Gill in 'Rats), Scott Mosier (Willam and angry cigarette buying hockey playing customer in Clerks, Scotty in 'Rats) and Walt Flannigan (Five different parts in Clerks, six if you include the cut scene, Fanboy in 'Rats) that makes three by my count.

4.0 out of 5 stars The weakest of the New Jersey trilogy is still a great read, February 9, 1998

By 

Evan A. Baker "Malcontent for hire" (Irvine, CA USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Mallrats (Paperback)

Many of Kevin Smith's fans were dissapointed in his second film, Mallrats, and it certainly id not on the same level as Clerks or the more recent Chasing Amy. However, I feel the weakness of the film is largely due to some weaknesses in the casting, a theory which is supported by this screenplay, which is far far better read than when mouthed by the film's cast.