|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 Review
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
2 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Modern Judicial Review?,
By David (USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Marbury V. Madison and Judicial Review (Paperback)
Clinton's study of the origins of judicial review is very interesting despite some major weaknesses. His attempt to understand what the Framers of the Constitution believed judicial review to be would be much stronger with more detail to the controversies raging within states just after ratification about judicial review. This is because he depends heavily upon his assertion that Marbury was consistent with the generally understood meaning of judicial review that the Framers shared. If there was no generally understood meaning about judicial review, then his hypothesis suffers a major blow.
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
Marbury V. Madison and Judicial Review by Robert Lowry Clinton (Paperback - September 1, 1989)
$19.95 $18.95
In Stock | |
 
| ||
