Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
19 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The best book there is on this topic,
This review is from: Mary and the Fundamentalist Challenge (Paperback)
Fr. Stravinskas' work here is first rate. It is the best answer to and analysis of the theological underpinnings (ultimately disastrous) of the Fundamentalist and Evangelical phobic responses to Mary and Marian devotion. A must read!
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent!!,
By A Customer
This review is from: Mary and the Fundamentalist Challenge (Paperback)
An excellent resource for Marian apologetics. Fr Stravinskas cites numerous objections and answers them. Footnotes provide full information for more research if the reader desires. Great!
10 of 31 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Polemical and Unscholarly,
By A Customer
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Mary and the Fundamentalist Challenge (Paperback)
Stravinskas presents a fairly standard view of the history of Fundamentalism, and provides some interesting, if mostly anecdotal, evidence of the increased acceptance of Marian devotion in Protestant Charismatic efforts to proselytize hispanic Roman Catholics. I believe that this is the only source for research on the subject, and thus must reluctantly recommend it to those interested in this new proselytism.Unfortunatly, the book does not measure up to its title. Stravinskas falls flat on his face in examining Protestant views of Mary, and the reasons for their rejection of the Catholic view. One wonders how it is possible to write a 230-footnote chapter on the role of Mary in Protestant and Fundamentalist theology without actually presenting a view of what Protestants think. Stravinskas shows the positions of the Reformers as being more sympathetic to the Catholic view, but this is irrelevant to the modern Protestant position. He quotes a number of liberal Protestant theologians who are also sympathetic, but these views are largely unknown to the rank-and-file. Worst of all, when he actually deals with Protestants who are more representative of popular belief, he never actually addresses their arguments! Stravinskas gets truly mean-spirited here, using [sic] to point out grammatical mistakes and painting his opponents as buffoons. He only quotes objections of the 'Pope=Antichrist' variety, and sources that are at the lunatic fringe of Fundamentalism. The real pity is that there are serious issues at hand that would be addressed in a more honest work, such as the Protestant view of sole mediatorship and the definition of 'worship'. These must be dealt with, both to defend against sheep-stealing and in ecumenical dialog. Anyone interested in these issues would be better served by works such as _The One Mediator, the Saints, and Mary (Lutherans and Catholics in Dialog No. 8)_, rather than by this hate-filled polemic.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|