16 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
What's up with the Romanization?, February 6, 2000
This review is from: Mastering Korean with Cassettes (Foreign Service Institute Language Series) (Audio Cassette)
Okay, I am the first to admit that I should have known better than to think that a book and tapes could help you "master" a language, but this book is almost useless. First, I don't know why, the book is romanized, which means that it uses the English alphabet. It is so hard to learn Korean this way. Secondly, the dialouges on the tapes are extremely fast. It is hard to follow and I speak some Korean. Thirdly, the examples are mindless substitutions. Easy, but useless. Anyway, I know there are not many good texts out there for Korean, and good ones with audio are rarer still, but I don't think that this is worth it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
19 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Incredible, August 14, 2001
This review is from: Mastering Korean with Cassettes (Foreign Service Institute Language Series) (Audio Cassette)
It's a shame that the audiolingual method has so fallen out of favor with the language teaching literati. As a former EFL teacher in Korea I can say that communicative language teaching leaves a lot to be desired; as does any "method": a motivated learner creates her own opportunities; lack of motivation, with even the best "method" leads nowhere.
And so for motivated learners, this audiolingual course is a wonder. If you have the patience to put up with the seemingly mindless drills, this one course will give you a strong, unconscious foundation in Korean grammar. Your grammar will be as instinctive as Daniel's front blocks in "The Karate Kid" after he waxes all those cars.
I completely disagree with those who say that one must learn Hangul first. To this day in Korea I read the English street signs because, even after seven years, I'm faster at reading roman letters. Why does this matter? If you follow audiolingual methodology, you're forced to repeat things until you can say them at native speed. You're cautioned not to proceed to the next lesson until you have mastered the current one at native speed. To do so, you must be able to scan the given sentences quickly so as to repeat them quickly. I still can't do this in Hangul; it's easy in the romanization. After hours of drills at native speed, then, when you talk to people, even in your fledgling stage, they're going to understand you and, in Korea at least, give you the praise that will keep you studying.
If you learn Hangul first you won't acquire that ability to repeat so quickly, as you'll be trudging through the--yes, easy and scientific, but more difficult than the roman alphabet for English speakers--Hangul. You'll also be more likely to have one of the boring, occasionally jingoistic books that line the shelves here. This book cuts to the chase: No junk about four seasons and Tangun; all hard, memory-path-building exercises about taking the bus and going out to dinner.
If you put up with negligble faults: the funky roman letters, the guy's bizarre pronunciation (One of my Korean friends thought he was a non-native speaker of Korean), the formality, and the antiquated expressions (this was written a while ago), you'll be fine.
Not everyone can learn through the audiolingual method, but this course is worth a try.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Frustrating, but sadly, worth the money., December 15, 2002
This review is from: Mastering Korean with Cassettes (Foreign Service Institute Language Series) (Audio Cassette)
If I were a diplomat smoothing out tensions between cold war rivals 50 years ago, with brylcreem in my hair and a cigarette holder, this would be the perfect course. If you care to speak Korean the way George Plimpton speaks English, then this is what you need. Deals almost exclusively in the formal polite tenses, the romanization they use takes as much time to learn as Hangul itself, and the print is so tight that it's impossible to tell what the hangul text is half the time. The vocabulary is outdated (No one calls a post office "upyonguk" anymore- it's "uchaeguk")and the editing is sloppy. Unfortunately, the lack of decent resources in self-taught korean actually make it worth buying for the mere fact that it is in print. Buy it because you need a foundation in Korean, not because you want to dabble in Korean for fun. Unless properly motivated, this will destroy any will you have to learn Korean.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No