- Buy $50 in qualifying physical textbooks, get $5 in Amazon MP3 Credit. Here's how (restrictions apply)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
23 of 26 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Very good but be aware of omissions,
By galloamericanus "galloamericanus" (Podunk, Iowa) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Mathematical Logic, Revised Edition (Paperback)
This book is indeed much shorter than Principia, mainly because it is derived for lecture notes for a 1 semester PhD course. It is also a lot clearer than PM. But the notation is largely the same, which makes for hard reading if your are under 50. Quine's proof format doesn't take up much space, but has always eluded me. This book contains the best treatment of truth functional and quantificational logic prior to natural deduction and truth trees.I like the set theory of this book, but I warn you that it is very nonstandard. Even ardent lovers of Quine's NF theory hate The weakness of this book is its treatment of metatheory: I respect the historical remarks a lot. Just one big omission: Quine, like nearly everyone of his generation, missed that
17 of 20 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
In Depth Look at Logic,
By A Customer
This review is from: Mathematical Logic, Revised Edition (Paperback)
Try this book when you know a bit about the basics of logic. The descriptions are much more lucid than those in Principia, even if the ideas are less earthshattering for there time. Quine, as he always does, gives a masterful, detailed look at logic. If you are a fan of logic and the foundations of math, this book is not to be missed.
5.0 out of 5 stars
Good book,
By Steven Ross (Kew Gardens, NY United States) - See all my reviews
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Mathematical Logic, Revised Edition (Paperback)
I have been reading this book off and on for years. It is beautiful. However, I am not well read in mathematical logic, and the comments of a mathematical logician as to whether the proofs are correct and what should be read next would be helpful to readers interested in mathematical logic. I read the book to understand Godel. There are better books for that. However, once I starting reading this book, I appreciated the eloquence of Prof. Quine and the beauty of the axioms, definitions and proofs in the book.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|