Trade in your item
Get a $18.75
Gift Card.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Mathematical Methods for Physicists, Sixth Edition: A Comprehensive Guide Hardcover – June 21, 2005

ISBN-13: 978-0120598762 ISBN-10: 0120598760 Edition: 6th

6 New from $75.00 9 Used from $33.99
Rent from Amazon Price New from Used from
eTextbook
"Please retry"
$32.87
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$45.99 $1.29
Hardcover, June 21, 2005
$75.00 $37.95

There is a newer edition of this item:


Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student



NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE
Save up to 90% on Textbooks
Rent textbooks, buy textbooks, or get up to 80% back when you sell us your books. Shop Now

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 1200 pages
  • Publisher: Academic Press; 6 edition (June 21, 2005)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0120598760
  • ISBN-13: 978-0120598762
  • Product Dimensions: 2.8 x 7.9 x 9.5 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 4 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 2.9 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (68 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #398,012 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

"As to a comparison with other books of the same ilk, well, in all honesty, there are none. No other text on methods of mathematical physics is as comprehensive and as complete...I encourage the students to keep their copies as they will need it and will find it an invaluable reference resource in later studies and research."
- Tristan Hubsch, Howard University


Book Description

More that 90,000 copies sold!

More About the Authors

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

I used this book for graduate mathematical physics as well as the "essential" version for undergraduate math methods.
Jason Francis
It is essentially a large reference book for those that already have mastery of the topics and is of very little use as a textbook.
Tracy Tuttle
Everything is mentioned, but if you want to learn about something, you need to know a lot more than just a definition.
ckott72

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

60 of 63 people found the following review helpful By Robert Evans on November 13, 2006
Format: Hardcover
I am a graduate physics student with a strong mathematical background. This is the textbook used for our 2 semester course in mathematical methods for physics. The book is massive, both in content and physical weight. The cover is attractive and the printing seems to be fairly high quality. Now comes the difficult part of the review: finding other positive comments. First of all, I have only used a few chapters of the book thus far, so my comments pertain only to those. Some difficulties I have found... There are no answers to any exercises making the book fairly useless for self-study. The material is very uneven, as if each section was written by a different author (graduate student?). The explanations and examples are mediocre at best (contrast with the Mary Boas book). There are MANY typos - what ever happened to proof reading? The class INSTRUCTOR doesn't like the book, but is forced to use it by the department, and has regularly emailed the authors with corrections and recommendations. None of the students in the class like the book. You may be forced to use this book, but I would recommend other books as supplements (e.g., the book by Mary Boas and several in the Schaum Outline Series).
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
39 of 41 people found the following review helpful By Rod HUg on November 30, 1999
Format: Hardcover
My instructor chose Arfken as the text for our Mathematical Physics class. He has a high opinion of the book, although he did not require it to be read and did not assign any of the exercises. Rather than using Arfken, most of the students in my class used various mathematics and physics books from the university library. My opinion of Arfken is that it is so condensed that it is not understandable to undergraduates. You need to consult other texts extensively to fill in the gaps. For example, Arfken develops tensor analysis on pages 126 thru 130, 5 pages total. My copy of Applications of Tensor Analysis by McConnell does the same on it's first 171 pages. I hesitate to say that Arfken is useless, but you can draw your own conclusion from my last example. Arfken is so abbreviated that it is not useful to the undergraduate as a reference either, in my opinion. Perhaps it is useful to persons who are familiar with the subject matter in advance, I am not sure. Were one or a group of people to flush this book out it might be more useful, but it would no doubt become many volumes.
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
61 of 68 people found the following review helpful By A Customer on June 17, 2000
Format: Hardcover
The lecturer of our undergraduate Mathematical Methods for Physics course said that he recommends Arfken's book because it will be useful also later as a reference book. Hearing those words, I could not help but to think "this is one of *those* books". And indeed, although Arfken's and Weber's book covers quite a wide range of mathematics, it does so by being very concise, e.g. there is usually only one example per topic. This is one example of why it is not a good textbook. Not following Arfken's course, I will give another example: there are no answers and no solutions for any of the problems, making it very undesirable from the viewpoint of the person who cannot attend all the lectures. Finally, text itself is quite concise, and often it stops at telling the things rather than explaining them also. I guess I have to admit that I am not one of the excellent students mentioned by a reviewer, for I liked Kreyszig's Advanced Engineering Mathematics much more. As a contrast to Arfken's book, it offered many examples and helped to understand what the thing was all about. Unfortunately, it does not cover nearly all of the topics covered by Mathematical Methods for Physicists. If Mathematical Methods for Physicists is going to be your first introductory text to these topics and if you are not supported by very good lectures I can only say that may God have mercy on your soul.
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
37 of 42 people found the following review helpful By A Customer on December 1, 2000
Format: Hardcover
I invite the students on this page to take, or at least appreciate, a long-term view. Arfken pays off in the working world, with its comprehensive coverage of topics, short self-contained discussions which don't require a lot of flipping back and forth to other chapters, a clear writing style, and few proofs to get in the way.
When I need to tackle a new problem which results in a coordinate system, function or technique that I'm rusty on, Arfken is usually the first book I pull off the shelf. Properties of Chebyshev polynomials for filter theory, or elliptic functions for the current density on a microstrip transmission line? Integral transforms? A comparison of Green's functions in 1, 2 and 3 dimensions for different electromagnetic diff eq's, all in one table? Group theory for certain phased-array antenna analyses? (really!) Tensors for analyzing flexure in superconducting magnet structures? Error functions for communications theory? It's all here in a quickly digestible form, with enough depth to solve a problem or at least prepare you to turn to a specialty text and quickly extract what's needed.
I always learn something from the examples, which typically apply the same mathematical tool for my problem to some completely different area of physics.
Arfken may not be an optimal text for a one-year course, but it's been my reliable working companion for 24 years. When my 2nd edition finally falls apart, I'll probably replace it with a new one.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Customer Images

Most Recent Customer Reviews

Search

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?