Customer Reviews


2 Reviews
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews
Most Helpful First | Newest First

6 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars page turner, March 10, 2005
By 
Erik Lundberg (Gainesville, FL United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Mathematical Methods in Science (MAA New Mathematical Library: Vol.26) (Anneli Lax New Mathematical Library) (Paperback)
This book describes plausible arguments for different laws of physics, like how levers work. There is the right amount of causual prose, mathematics, history, and cleverness blended together. I was able to think of fluid dynamics with his style of approaching things. The principle of insufficient reason he describes led me to develop my own test to see whether cars on the other side of the road were going faster or slower than me, which is practicle for when you don't know the speed limit.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5.0 out of 5 stars what the generic method is for, June 10, 2011
By 
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Mathematical Methods in Science (MAA New Mathematical Library: Vol.26) (Anneli Lax New Mathematical Library) (Paperback)
If you read Toeplitz's generic method and found it insufficient, this is the book that makes you happy.

People thinks Math helps Science but Polya shows the opposite is also true.
Nowadays, almost everybody tells about the generic method and Toeplitz but I found Polya is much better than Toeplitz. Don't talk about generic method in math education without this book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product