Most Helpful Customer Reviews
143 of 145 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
An introduction to the basic mathematics of physics, June 6, 1999
This review is from: Mathematics of Classical and Quantum Physics (Dover Books on Physics) (Paperback)
This book introduces the reader to the basic mathematical structures of theoretical physics: mainly Quantum Mechanics, Electromagnetic Theory, And Classical Mechanics. I used this at UC San Diego for a year long graduate course on Mathematical methods in physics and engineering. If one has the time, there is really a lot to be gained by carefully studying this book. A big part of the book is geared toward developing in detail the mathematics of the Quantum Theory. This is a good thing because in my experience most QM books are too eager to "get to the physics". It is true that you can get by with a superficial understanding of functional analysis and still do QM, but this book will give you an immensely deeper understanding of the underlying structure of the theory. In particular, the treatment of Green's functions and integral equations is good. There is chapter on Group Theory and it's uses in QM. Also is a chapter on Complex analysis, although it is a wise idea to read a book entirely devoted to this subject. Overall, I like this book very much.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
41 of 41 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
ridiculously good, September 26, 2005
This review is from: Mathematics of Classical and Quantum Physics (Dover Books on Physics) (Paperback)
The first chapter on vector analysis from the component view is the best treatment of the subject I've seen anywhere. I worked through it and the subsequent chapters on linear algebra before going to college, and it literally doubled or tripled my mathematical confidence/ability.
Now that i've had some more physics, i've been going through some of the other chapters. The treatment of each subject is framed in a way that makes immediate application to physics natural and intuitive. However, while the level of rigor falls somewhat short of many pure math analysis textbooks (ex: lebesque integration is discussed qualitatively, whereas ideally one would have studied measure theory and lebesque integration before hilbert spaces and other topics), the author does a good job of giving appropriate mathematical caveats this book (in my opinion) strikes an excellent balance of practicality without sacrificing rigor. I think this makes the book useful for physicists who would like a rigorous intro to the math without getting bogged down in (relatively) unappliable mathematical constructs.
Overall, this book is a must. I'd recommend the book early (as soon as one's taken multivariable calculus). There won't be any math in any physics course that you won't feel comfortable with after you've read through this book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
75 of 81 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Important Information, May 28, 2003
This review is from: Mathematics of Classical and Quantum Physics (Dover Books on Physics) (Paperback)
This book is not, and I repeat, IS NOT for the inexperienced. This book is a GRADUATE LEVEL TEXT on mathematical physics. If you are an undergraduate student taking a physics class, this book will be of no use to you. I recommend that anyone interested in purchasing this book have a somewhat decent amount of mathematical background. I personally recommend Calculus I-IV, Advanced Calculus and Linear Algebra. If, though, you have this background, then this book is may just be for you. It is concise, to the point and presents a clear and well written discussion of mathematical physics. I just felt that before you dive, head first, into the world of mathematical physics, somebody needed to warn you about what you were getting yourself into.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|