Customer Reviews

Space, Time and Matter, and the Falsity of Einstein's Theory of Relativity

5 star:		(6)
4 star:		(1)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(2)

 

 

With superb clarity and undeniable logic the author explores the subject and philosophy of space, time and mater and gives a proof after proof of the falsity of Einstein's theory of electromagnetism and gravity. Discloses the substance of the electron and the non-reality of the photon. This is a down to earth, highly readable, provocative and electrifying work.

Mr. Kamenov's carefully laid-out explanation of Einstein's theory of relativity makes his book worth-while purchasing if only because such deft "vulgarizations" are rare--taking down complexity to a manageable level for John Q Public. Mr. Kamenov also happens to disagree with the theory in his own words and his own arguments. The basic mathematical equation (E=MC2) proves that "matter"--ultimately in the shape of atoms--was formed as encapsulated energy in the vast speed-of-light explosion and conflagration of the Big Bang. To extend this basic axiom beyond the explosion to the Universal process itself as it expands radially outward seems logical but it runs into problems which Mr. Kamenov deals with systematically.

Whether one agrees or disagrees with Einstein's theory, Astrophysicists have unified the vast cosmic distances of space and time into a single dimension (space-time) that physically eschews a straight line to actually "bend". In the concept of space-time, space is construed for all practical purposes as pure void--a `nothing' entity. Such entity would logically require some kind of structure in order to bend a ray of light, or at least a medium wherein continuity of physical contact allows gravity to exert itself. The same magnetic `pull' that keeps stars and planets in delicate orbit equilibrium would also affect a beam of light's path through the cosmos. Rather than pure void, Mr. Kamenov thus hints to an ocean of radiation particles (gravitons, photons etc...)--a medium previously called `ether', subsequently discarded but now worthy of reappraisal, reinstatement and renewed experimentation.

SUPERB!Mr. Kamenov has done a superb job in this book explaining the falsity in Einstein's theory of relativity in a very simple but a very logical and convincing way. Especially, his argument about proof of simultaneity, speed of light, concept of time and matter are so clear and precise that one couldn't help not agree. It would be interesting to hear about this book from the elite physicists of reputable institutions and publications. Until then , I congratulate Mr. Kamenov for writing this book so interestingly readable even by an average layman.

Reading "Space, Time, and Matter and the Falsity of Einstein's Theory of Relativity" was such a fascinating experience for me. After absorbing all of the info in Chapter 5, I remained transfixed on fundamental issues, such as time, relativity, abstract and space. Some of the well-known theories commingle and contrast with each other, challenging one's mind in a unique fashion. This book makes you think twice; provoking, cutting edge book.

Mr Kamenov shows that his knowledge about relativity is virtually non existent. Just one example is his statment that the Michelson-Morley experment should have shown an interference patern due to length contraction. Length contraction only occures if two objects have a relative motion. Since the A - B arm had no relative motion with respect to the observer, no length contraction is predicted by relativity. The book only has value to the extent that a student of Relativity might be chalenged a bit, and thus increase their knowledge, if they are able to explain why Mr Kamenov is wrong. Robert Richardson Dallas Rrichar911@aol.com

In 1972 the famous British professor Herbert Dingle, an ex-relativist who turned into antirelativist, published a book against relativity titled: Science at the crossroads. Because of that he was gradually removed from the "scientiffic" establishment. Kamen Kamenov's book is one of the books, alongside those of Herbert Dingle, Harald Nordenson and Henri Bergson, highly recommendable to those who really want to understand how incurably flawed and useless the "theory" in question is and why it should be abandoned in its entirety. Some books are hard to find. Look in "bookfinder.com" and read about the above mentionned autors in Wikipedia.

Provocative and fascinating. Mr. Kamenov provides the clearest possible nonmathematical explanation of the present day understanding of the theory of relativity and then unmistakably disproves it. His logic is undeniable . I think that after reading the book nobody can believe in the validity of the theory of relatvity any longer but quite the opposite is true,the theory is wrong. Mr. Kamenov explains in plain langauge the real nature of relity and offers alternative solution to the theory of relativity. He proves the existence of ether. The book deals not only with theory of relativity but also with the philosophy of space, time and physical matter and explains in a plain , nonmathematical way the nature of electricity , magnetism and gravitation. This book is realy easy to understand but it requires an abstract thinking . It is a great exercise for the mind and Mr. Kamenov is a great mind. I read the book several times and every time it was even more interesting. I could not stop reading it. I believe that this book will revolutionize the modern science. It is a real treasure.

No SR or GR claims have ever been counter-demonstrated and this book displays a lack of comprehension of basic Physics. The admitted lack of knowledge of the many standard paradoxes is evident with instances of rookie frame jumping. The doppler shift conclusion and simultaneity proof are both wrong. The only possible way to assault relativity, given its mathematical self-consistency, is externally by empirically invalidating a postulate. The model still remains error-free, however it also remains open to a demonstration of not capturing reality. Meanwhile the orbital precession of Mercury, relativistic correction of the GPS satellite system and Fermi Lab's particle beams are all in compliance.
Those more knowledgeable of Physics look for a more inclusive theory.

Books like this are just ridiculous and, as stated by another reader, have the only utility of being used to prove how many nonsenses the author has written. Just to be clear: special relativity theory has been successfully tested in hundreds of experiments and is completely sound. Not a single professional scientist is questioning its validity. General relativity has been tested in many experiments but there are still crucial points to be checked, for instance gravitational waves have never been DIRECTLY detected. On the other hand there are indirect proves of their existence (Taylor's binary stars for the interested reader). In conclusion, if you want to learn about science please stay away from this book.

~-~
" Falsity of Einstein's Theory of Relativity " is
a breath of fresh air after centuries of medieval
dark ages in `modern` science!

Yes, our contemporary scientists can hold two or
more conflicting theories on their conscience at the
same time. *Just like most regular folks.

~~Do we need scientific clergy, sacred scriptures and
dogma in the Universities? (:) We got it now!!
We have to go back ! Be afraid of what?

>>There is so much in this book, that is enough for ten
new Theories. If some part are not exactly right, it's
still a noble and brave book, with intriguing logic.

Those are like crutches, we seems to need; only of our weakneses and insecurities.
Now, Mr. Kamenov is taking them way. And we have to learn to walk: without fear.
--Because, WE CAN !