66 of 70 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Quantum Physics and Consciousness, January 24, 2002
This review is from: Mind, Matter and Quantum Mechanics (Hardcover)
Though there is a fair amount of redundancy in this collection of papers originally published from the late 1960s to about 1990, I found the redundancy useful in coming to grips with the novel interpretations posited by Stapp. His primary thesis -- stunning in its simplicity -- is that consciousness can be usefully construed as the collapse of a superposition of brain states. Unlike the more mystical folks writing on quantum physics and consciousness, Stapp provides a number of highly technical examples of exactly how this process might work neurophysiologically. Essentially, his ideas are an explicit working-out of Heisenberg's ontology joined with William James' concepts. This brilliant and difficult book well rewards the effort necessary to master its ideas. It is, I believe, the most sophisticated attempt yet to explain consciousness in quantum mechanical terms, far superior to more naive dualist attempts such as those by Eccles and Popper.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
a clearly written and thought provoking book, October 6, 2009
This book is clearly written and for a general audience. Stapp presents not only his own ideas but those of other esteemed scientists in a well organized way. There are a number of anecdotes that are interesting and give insight into how the differing points of view on the quantum measurement problem developed.
The question of how to interpret quantum mechanics is not resolved and Henry Stapp has taken an approach toward it that is meant to address the question of efficacious free will and the mind/body problem. His approach is inspired by the work of John von Neumann and is neither reductionist nor solipsistic.
Some very thought provoking questions are addressed in this well written book geared for an audience with some background in science.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A PHYSICIST INTERPRETS MIND IN TERMS OF QUANTUM THEORY, September 16, 2010
Henry Stapp is an American physicist, well-known for his work in quantum mechanics.
He states in the Preface to this 1993 book, "This volume brings together several works of mine that aim to answer the question: How are conscious processes related to brain processes? My goal differs from that of most other quantum physicists who have written about the mind-brain problem. It is to explain how the content of each conscious human thought, as described in psychological terms, is related to corresponding processes occuring in a human brain, as described in the language of contemporary phyical science."
Here are some representative quotations from the book:
"The commitment here is, I believe, to the appropriateness, in quantum theory, of a classical description of the experimental conditions, rather than to the fundamental accuracy of classical ideas at the macroscopic level. This position is in complete accord with pragmatism." (Pg. 63)
"Man's free will is no illusion. It constitutes his essence. And it rests upon the law of necessity. Any play of chance would falsify the idea that I, from the ground of my essential nature, make a true choice." (Pg. 91)
"The second problem is that, owing to a failure of an essential condition of isolation, quantum theory, as developed for the study of atomic processes, does not apply to biological systems, such as brains." (Pg. 147)
"Science this provides man with at least the rudiments of a cohesive view of nature in which his own thoughts and actions are integral parts of a universe that generates meaningful options via the laws of nature, but is not rigidly controlled by these laws." (Pg. 196)
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No