Customer Reviews

Matthew (Brazos Theological Commentary on the Bible)

5 star:		(5)
4 star:		(3)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

Stanley Hauerwas' theological commentary on Matthew approaches this Gospel from a thematic standpoint, largely centered on the implications of following Christ. It also addresses relevant topics such as abortion, homosexuality and marriage in a timely, penetrating way. Throughout this volume, Hauerwas interacts with the writings of theologians such as Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Karl Barth and John Howard Yoder. As expected, Christian ethics and pacifism are well explicated at key points throughout this book. He gently challenges the Reformational understanding that views the Sermon on the Mount as Law rather than Gospel, and argues that it reflects the obligations now placed upon all who call themselves Christians. His explanation of the relationship between Israel and the Church is seemingly vague, which undoubtedly will frustrate both Dispensationalists and Covenantalists alike. At one point, he seems to question the eternal nature of the human soul by implication without explicitly denying it. Interestingly, he interprets Jesus' reference in Matthew 24:15 to 'the abomination that causes desolation' from Daniel 9:27 as a prediction of Christ's own crucifixion, which brought about the subsequent end of the Jewish Temple system. The section on Matthew 24 and 25 contains a healthy discussion about the nature of apocalyptic literature and its relationship to our anticipation of the Second Coming. It is a welcome corrective to the paranoia peddled by the authors of the Left Behind series. Hauerwas' interpretative decisions clearly demonstrate his familiarity with current Matthean scholarship. My only minor quibble is that he doesn't articulate why he chose one particular interpretation over another. This is especially important when dealing with passages like Matthew 24:15. I recommend that those planning to preach or teach through Matthew supplement Hauerwas' volume, which only offers broad commentary on each chapter and subsequently doesn't address the entire text of Matthew in a verse-by-verse manner, with R.T. France's The Gospel of Matthew in the NICNT series, which is the most thorough commentary on this Gospel currently available.

Christians need to see why some interpretations are more viable than others. This is one of the primary reasons why people consult commentaries in the first place. While it's true that more linguistically-oriented exegetical commentaries already do this, it would be refreshing for the Brazos Theological Commentary to explain why certain interpretations are THEOLOGICALLY correct while others are erroneous. Hopefully, subsequent volumes will contain such helpful guidance whenever warranted (Particularly Joseph L. Mangina's volume on Revelation). Offering specific theological defenses of particular interpretations versus other options would be a very useful void for subsequent volumes in this series to fill. It would also make each volume even more useful for preaching and teaching. I certainly hope that series editor, R. R. Reno, will move future volumes in this direction.

Even when I disagreed with some of Hauerwas' observations, I was still thankful for his willingness to be provocative in constructive ways. All of his provocative statements are certainly plausible rather than improbable and will stretch one out of their comfort zone. This commentary will serve pastors, teachers and laypeople immensely as they endeavor to follow Christ in our increasingly complex world. Hauerwas gives plenty of good insight that will greatly enrich sermons, Sunday school classes, Bible studies, and times of private reflection. Above all, it will challenge anyone who reads it to count the cost of following Christ. Highly recommended, regardless of one's theological persuasion!

As I write there are now four volumes published in Brazos's projected forty-volume series of theological commentaries on the Bible. Jaroslav Pelikan led the series with a masterful study of the book of Acts (2005), Peter Leithart studied 1-2 Kings (2006), Matthew Levering wrote on Ezra and Nehemiah (2007), and in the present volume Stanley Hauerwas of Duke University tackles the gospel of Matthew. My own experience of reading Bible commentaries has often been frustrating; their linguistic dissection of verb tenses and technical comparisons of what other scholars have written has generally left me spiritually hungry. The Brazos series moves to theological reflection, and I have been very grateful for the volumes by Pelikan and Hauerwas that I've read.

Matthew's gospel, Hauerwas reminds us, is not intended to provide mere theological information (although it does do that). Rather, it's a manual to train and transform us into disciples of Jesus, for "Jesus the Son of God is what Matthew is all about." In contrast to the many ways that we sentimentalize the gospel, the kingdom that Jesus announced is nothing less than a radically subversive and alternative way of life. The Jesus way unmasks our own deep anxieties, our denials of our dependency, the "legitimating stories" of our modern world, and our doomed attempts to secure our own (illusory) salvation on our own terms by work, politics, money, sex, power, reputation, etc. "There is a kind of madness," says Hauerwas, "with being a disciple of Jesus."

Hauerwas takes a simple approach to organization, devoting one chapter to each chapter of Matthew. Readers who are familiar with his many other works will not be surprised to find heavy doses of Augustine, Barth, Bonhoeffer, and Yoder. Hauerwas is at his prophetic best in pointing us to the disruption and offense provoked by the Gospel. On the third page of his book he observes that "after Jesus there is no 'normal,' or, put differently, after Jesus we are able to live 'normally' only because of his extraordinary work." And then on the next-to-the last page: "The problem, after all, is not belief in the resurrection, but whether we live lives that would make sense if in fact Jesus has not been raised from the dead." The way of discipleship, then, is difficult, but it's not dismal. Rather, it's the only true way of genuine human joy.

This is an excellent volume for ministers, teachers, and students. Hauerwas did an outstanding job of explaining the temptations Jesus experienced in the desert. His overall treatment of the Sermon on the Mount was also excellent. I wish Hauerwas would have been more specific with the details. Because he is such a profound thinker, it would have been nice to know his conclusions concerning each detail. This commentary, however, is an excellent source for giving the overall feel of Matthew's gospel. It is well worth the price and a source I always use when teaching Matthew.

Stanley Hauerwas is a brilliant theologian. And the Gospel of Matthew is a complex and engaging text that tells us the story of Jesus. Putting the two together was a fantastic idea.

Hauerwas's telling of Matthew is replete with wisdom, though the delivery of such wisdom is done in a different manner than that of most standard commentaries. Hauerwas believes that Matthew has supplied us with exactly what we need to know if we are to be disciples of Jesus. Therefore, he sticks to Matthew's telling, adding insight here and there from his wider reading of the biblical narrative, the lives of Christians throughout time who exemplify Matthew's portrayal of Jesus, and the thoughts of theologians such as Bonhoeffer, Barth, and Aquinas, among others. The commentary is divided by the chapter layout of the Gospel, with most chapters being treated singularly, though a few are treated in tandem. As noted by other reviewers, throughout this commentary Hauerwas follows Matthew in centering his story on the cross and what the cross means for Christian discipleship to Jesus.

This commentary was given to me as a Christmas gift, and what a great gift it is. I've underlined and blocked off a number of key quotations, have been given great insight into the Gospel of Matthew that beforehand I did not possessed, and, perhaps most importantly, in reading this commentary I have gained a greater understanding of what it means to follow Jesus. If you're looking for a linguistic, grammatical, or technical commentary, this resource won't be the best toward those ends, but if you're looking for a work of theological substance that can help you or those you teach come to a greater understanding of what it means to live as the People of God in the world today, this commentary will more than suffice.

The first thing one must do to truly appreciate this work is to recognize that it is not just a "commentary," but a "theological commentary." This is an important distinction, and makes all the difference in properly utilizing this book. When I first received it, I tried to use it like I would any Biblical commentary; i.e. when I was studying a particular passage in Matthew's Gospel, I would look up the corresponding passage in Hauerwas' text to read his insights. This was a frustrating and fruitless experience. This led me to initially write off the book as disappointing.

However, I later picked up the book, and noted that Hauerwas himself writes in the Introduction:

"I have tried to write the commentary in the hope that those reading the commentary will want to read it as a book. In other words, I hope that the reader will read the commentary the way they read a novel....The reader may wish to read what I have to say about this or that passage, but the intelligibility of the commentary depends upon its being read in sequence."

So I decided to read the commentary as Hauerwas suggested, and found it a very compelling and helpful book. Each chapter in the commentary corresponds to one or two chapters from Matthew, and the book has a definite flow in which one is taken into the drama of Christ's life as told by Matthew. I was struck by Hauerwas' insights throughout the book, and often found myself deepening my appreciation and knowledge of Matthew's Gospel along the way.

My only criticism is that I think Hauerwas spends too much time on an issue that is obviously dear to him - pacifism. He even notes in his Introduction that many might criticize him for this indulgence, and personally I think those criticisms are valid. While I appreciate Hauerwas' passion in his regard, and found that his writing on this subject to be challenging (in a good way), he overdid it. Matthew's Gospel was not written to be a statement on the Christian use (or non-use) of violence, but one almost gets that impression from this commentary.

But that is my only complaint. Overall, Dr. Hauerwas has written an insightful, beautifully written and theologically deep commentary, one that should be appreciated by any Christian for years to come. It is a strong contribution to a fine series.

Haurwas' commentary consistently not only elaborates and unpacks Matthew's gospel but it truly speaks to me in a devotional manner. I often refer to this commentary in regards to passages of Matthew that I'm studying and/or teaching. Haurwas complements the standard commentaries I also read by bringing his view as a Christian ethics theologian to the text. He always opens it up and exegetes it in unique ways that are meaningful to study and application. In the sense that this commentary is both academic and scholarly plus is devotional, it is remarkable.

Haurwas offers an introduction and then a chapter of commentary for each chapter of Matthew's gospel. Haurwas does not go verse by verse, but he does follow the text progressively for each chapter, as he ties the teachings, parables, miracles and events together. Haurwas often draws on Bonhoeffer and John Howard Yoder, as well as other theologians and Bible commentators to provide depth to his discussions.

This is an excellent resource for all Christians.

I have so many Biblical commentaries and they all say the same thing. They are all based on historical-critical approach, which is fine for teaching a Bible study, but I find useless for preaching. This is now my go-to commentary. I can get a quick and interesting theological framework of the text and take it from there to apply to the lives of the parishioners.

The book arrived in good condition and on time. The jury is still out on Hauerwas on this particular book for it seems to be a vastly different opinion than previous works.