1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Really, really bad, September 14, 2006
John Trenhaile lives in England - and this is an important fact for the rest of this review. He lives in England and he has written a mystery set in California.
Now, it seems to me that a mystery set in 1990s California should feature characters that sound like Californians, behave like Californians and follow Californian police procedures. Instead, Trenhaile has characters that speak like they live in England, they behave like the English and they follow insanely ridiculous police procedures.
By page 150 of this 388 page book I was sick of the meandering story and the unprofessional behavior of the psychologist. But then I started to fold over the pages that had silly comments, unlikely technical achievements and flat out use of non-American English. I ended up with well over 30 folded pages.
Examples of non-American English:
Police chief yelling at reporters before a press conference: "Give way!...Give way to the front there!"
One of the policemen mentions that he talked to someone a "fortnight" ago. Fortnight is never used in America!
A character mentions that she wants to move away. She says that they should just "move house."
Bad facts:
He refers to the reporter at a local CBS affiliate station as a CBS reporter - that is never done in the United States. Reporters who work for a network affiliate always say that they work for the affiliate (WTHR or KABC, for example), not the network. That is because they DO NOT work for the network!
He has the police talking about executing someone via the Electric Chair in Cailifornia - California only uses lethal injection.
Technical impossibility:
A CD player is playing a CD when the power is cut at the fuse box. After several seconds, power is restored and the CD player resumes playing right where it stopped!
At the very least, Trenhaile should have had an American editor read the book to see if the dialogue sounded even close to true. Also, anyone who has worked a CD player would know that his description, while certainly dramatic when placed in its scene, is impossible.
But even more unforgivable is the boring, plodding, dragging, annoying first half of this book. Do not buy this dog - read the back of a cereal box instead!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
0 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
An interesting, creepy story., July 8, 1998
While I was underwhelmed with this book at the beginning, it eventually reeled me in and got me involved with the characters and the mystery. The climax of the book is quite tense and effective. However, I was offended by some remarks made by the main character, psychologist Diane Cheung, during the final conflict. I haven't quite decided whether these close-minded views are those of the character or the author himself.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No