Customer Reviews

The Medicalization of Everyday Life: Selected Essays

5 star:		(4)
4 star:		(0)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

If this doesn't challenge a few deeply held beliefs you are either comatose or Dr. Szasz yourself. Boy, this one just wrestles everything you think about mental health and forces you to contemplate just what you know vs what you've been told, and accept because the person telling you had a pile of degrees and a white jacket. I include 3 quotes here to give you a flavor:

The old quacks peddled fake cures to treat real diseases. The new quacks peddle fake diseases to justify chemical pacification and medical coercion. The old quacks were politically harmless: they could harm individuals only with those individuals' consent. The new quacks are a serious threat to individual liberty and personal responsibility: they are agents of the therapeutic state who can and do harm individuals both with and without those individuals' consent. Theocracy is the alliance of religion with the state. Pharmacracy is the alliance of medicine with the state

Today virtually any unwanted behavior, from shopaholism and kleptomania to sexaholism and pedophilia, may be defined as a disease whose diagnosis and treatment belong in the province of the medical system. Disease-making thus has become similar to lawmaking. Politicians, responsive to tradition and popular opinion, can define any act, from teaching slaves to read to the cold-blooded murder of a bank guard, as a crime whose control belongs in the province of the criminal justice system.

Formerly, the people rushed to embrace totalitarian states. Now they rush to embrace the therapeutic state. By the time they discover the therapeutic state is about tyranny, not therapy, it will be too late.

Dr. Szasz is unfortunately fighting a losing battle as we trade freedom for comfort, eagerly handing over our children, our health, and our choices to experts who know more than we do. Well, do they? Who says so? They do, over and over and over. And we have allowed ourselves to stop believing things we know, as those white-coated experts have assured us we do not know. Only they do. And they will act in our best interests. Read his account of his trial testimony. It is wildly funny, brilliantly effective, and scathingly brutal. Psychiatry is used to dispose of unwanted people. What will prevent you from becoming such a person?

A reader who can say this book is about criticizm of a public policy banning smoking and transfats has to be "selectively inattentive" to say the least.

Character assassination is an ancient technique when the critic does not have enough quality arguments to oppose the arguments he does not like in a civilized manner. Therefore, Professor Szasz is portrayed as an "iconoclast", his ideas are taken out of context and ridiculed in a supposedly neutral editorial review.

While the authors of review are busy laughing at Professor Szasz, Professor Szasz did not actually "discover America" by saying that mental illness is a fake, he definitely is not the first person who has criticized psychiatrists for their ways and he is definitely in good company exposing the psychiatric "industry".

Daniel Defo, Fyodor Dostoyevskiy, Leo Tolstoy, Anton Chekhov, Jonathan Swift, to name a few renouned humanists and intellectual giants, have been criticizing "mad-doctoring" as a form of social control and oppression driven exclusively by greed. These writers described enough cases when sane people pronounced insane and locked up where just unwanted wives, and members of low-status social or ethnic groups. Professor Szasz is describing an enlightening history of psychiatric abuse that is actually worth reading just for the sake of information he has generously discovered and provided for the public.

It is also easy to ascertain the truth of what Professor Szasz is saying, irrespective of the fact if you like his "iconoclastic career" or not. People not lazy to reach out and read the book Professor Szasz is criticizing, namely, the psychiatric diagnostic Bible DSM can see what KIND of symptoms are regarded as pathological and how those diagnoses are designed (if you take any two symptoms out of 8 in this column and any 3 out of 6 in that column...). Then it pays to analyze thyself and ask thyself how many mental disorders you can easily ascribe to ANYBODY around you including yourself and your loved ones. It is not evidence that everybody around you is sick, it is rather evidence that DSM-IV makers are greedy, and financial ties of the majority of DSM-making experts to drug manufacturers have been recently exposed in the media.

Out of professional good faith it should not have been too much trouble for the editorial review board to open the book they were officially reviewing, say, on page 21 (Chapter "Diagnosis: from description to prescription"). The whole idea of the book is there - with proof and reliable references. And it is definitely not about tobacco or diet. When reviewing, it helps to actually review.

As a long-time repeat customer of Amazon.com I am appalled at the bias and disrespect with which the editorial review is written. Such bias to one author raises issues of quality of editorial reviews for all other books trading on Amazon.com. Note to Amazon.com management: it pays to be fair.

This book is a collection of important essays by a leading expert in the subject of psychiatry. Dr. Szasz tells it like it really is. As a long-term activist in the anti-psychiatry movement, I highly recommend this book.

I have read many works by Dr. Szasz. The Medicalization of Everyday Life contains some of his best essays. I have read my copy three times, yet almost every paragraph still evokes either a smile or a pause for reflection. While the content is excellent, it is the author's wit and style that make this work a most rewarding read, and re-read. In light of the fact that English is not the author's native tongue, his ability to consistently write such prose that sings is remarkable.

Please make this available in e-book format!