Automotive Deals HPCC Amazon Fashion Learn more nav_sap_plcc_ascpsc $5 Albums Fire TV Stick Happy Belly Coffee Handmade school supplies Shop-by-Room Amazon Cash Back Offer TarantinoCollection TarantinoCollection TarantinoCollection  Amazon Echo  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Amazon Echo Introducing new colors All-New Kindle Oasis AutoRip in CDs & Vinyl Segway miniPro

Your rating(Clear)Rate this item
Share your thoughts with other customers

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on May 16, 2003
This book sets out to provide a general overview of medieval monasticism. Starting with it's development in the 3rd Century in the Middle East, Lawrence describes it's early forms, such as strict adherence to ascetism, cenobitism or a combination, and key founders such as Pachomius and Basil. He then traces its spread westward and the explosion of monasticism that occurred shortly after Benedict wrote his Rule for monastic life. From here he touches on Irish monasticism, though perhaps not as thoroughly as warranted, as well as Columbanus and his work in Gaul with the Merovingians. Interestingly, he mentions St. Patrick only briefly and, to me, massively understates Patrick's role in founding the Celtic church and subsequent Irish Monasticism. Perhaps a bit of English bias? To continue, Lawrence examines the founding and influence of Cluny as the first "restoration of Benedictine life" as well as its decline and how it was eventually eclipsed by the Cistercians and subsequently the Friars, each of which also claimed to be getting back to the roots of Benedict's Rule.
Throughout, he details not only the religious but also the secular roles that monasteries played in medieval life. These include such topics as the social, economic and political roles played by monasteries and their abbots. The effects of lay patronage and feudal obligations on monastic life are also detailed. He also describes the rise, decline and fall of the Knightly orders as well as the role of women in monastic life, detailing the Cistercian nuns and Beguines in particular. A discussion of the Friars concludes the work. In this, he details their origins and how they believed in a life of piety among the people rather than separated from them. This led to them undertaking roles as preachers and Samaritans among the populace. He also details how the Friars came in conflict with the clergy (as they often siphoned off parishioners and, concomitantly, money, from established parishes) and the resolution of the dispute. He concludes by detailing the decline of the monasteries, both in numbers and importance, as the need for their social assistance declined and a more secular life became prevalent. Lawrence's overview is well researched, annotated and easy to read. The included glossary is an immense help for the monastic neophyte!
11 comment| 20 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
VINE VOICEon February 17, 2007
C.H. Lawrence's MEDIEVAL MONASTICISM is a good summary of the origins of monasticism from c. 500 A.D. to c. 1500 A.D. Lawrence examines the earliest monastistic movements throught the Age of the Friars or about 1400. His comparisons and contrasts of the different abbots and abbesses give readers an introduction of the complexity of Medieval monastic movements.

The early sections of the book give the reader a good introduction to early monastic movements both in Italy, France, and Ireland. One reviewer suggested that Lawrence should have given more attention to St. Patrick (389-461)which may be a valid criticism. However, readers should know that they can get a good assessment of the Irish Celtic monks and nuns c. page 40 to page 51. An interesting anecdote is that the Irish monastics included women who rose to positions of prominence as teachers and even leaders of some monastaries.

An interesting conflict among the Medieval monastic leaders was that of of seclusion or cloistered monks vs. those who wanted to do do missionary work and teach. The discipline imposed on monks and nuns seems too severe and strange to modern readers, but Mr. Lawrence tries to contrast the life of a cloistered monk or nun with that of secular men and women and their difficult lives at a time when living standards were not even remotely as high as they are now in the 21st. century. To paraphrase one of Lawrence's quotes attribauted to St. Bernard of Clairvaux, the latter said that the Cistertian monks were to lament and not to evangelize. This conflict was brought into clear focus in the disputes between St. Berard and St. Peter the Venerable.

Much of the book deals with these conflicts between leaders of different orders. When the Mendicant orders such as the Franciscans or Friars Minor (The Little Brothers)began their order, St. Francis of Assissi was adament about Franciscan poverty and refused to let any of his brothers to own any property at all. Yet, as Lawrence makes clear, this extreme poverty could not last if the Franciscans were to have facilities to assist the poor and the forgotten. As Lawerence explains, the Franciscans became imbued with the New Learning or Scholasticism that swept Medieval European Universities in the 12th and 13th centuries (the 1100s and 1200s). Even the cloistered monks were attracted to the New Learning and sent some of their monks to the universities which dismayed, among others, St. Bernard of Clairvaux. The Order of Preachers or Dominicans were clearly a missionary and learned order who were very attracted to Scholasticism and university teaching and learning. The Domincans were taught so they could counter arguments of heretics such as the Albigensians. The Dominican Friars produced some of the best men in philosophy such as St. Thomas Aquinas. The Franciscans could boast about St. Bonaventure and William of Occam. In other words, what began as cloistered orders of contemplative monks became a "more worldly" arrangement whereby the latter Medieval monks and frairs contributed not only to missionary efforts but the creative teaching and scholarship.

One minor criticism of this book is that C.H. Lawrence should have given more attention to the Dominicans and the influence that the Friars exerted on Medieval university learning and scholarship. Of all the achievements of the Medieval Catholic Church, the development of the universities was one of their most enduring. C.H. Lawrence may have considered this beyond the scope of his book.

In spite of this mild criticism, C.H. Lawrence wrote a good book. He explains the history and the seemingly strange monastic phenomenon to modern readers who might otherwise think that Medieval monks and nuns were not rational men and women to submit to such strict discipline and rules. This book is recommended to anyone who is interested in Medieval History which was an lively and interesting age.
0Comment| 14 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
VINE VOICEon November 3, 2005
C.H. Lawrence is Professor Emeritus of Medieval History at the University of London and has authored this textbook on monasticism from roughly 200 A.D. to 1300 A.D. It's basically what you'd expect from a history textbook that covers over 1000 years: it hits the highlights, shows the major trends, and briefly explains why certain persons, intitutions, etc. are important.

In general, I liked this book. For a textbook, Lawrence is pretty engaging in his writing style and he doesn't overwhelm the reader with too many proper nouns or jargon words in a row. Furthermore, he attempts to give a sense of personality and/or importnace of major historical figures. In reading this book, I get a better sense of famous monks (Bernard of Clairvioux, St. Benedict, St. Columbanus, Peter the Venerable, etc.) than I expected. Lawrence also does a good job when he describes life at particular monestaries/orders and how they differ from monestaries in other times and places.

An aspect of this textbook--necessary for such an undertaking--is that some areas get more attention than others. The Desert Fathers get a pretty good treatment as do St. Colambanus, the Cluny monestary, and the Friars (among others). Things that don't get as much attention are aspects of monastic life in Ireland, Italy, and Spain (France, England, and Germany get a lot of attention); the reforms of Pope Gregory, and detailed liturgical/hymnody advancements. Furthermore, as Lawrence leads us in our march through a thousand years of history, he really doesn't connect "what's going on in the monestary" with "what's going on in the rest of the world." This book assumes a fairly decent knowledge of Midieval European history.

In all, if you really want to read a texbook on monks, I think you'd be hard-pressed to find a better one. But if you're looking for a nice beach read or something to curl up with on a cold winter's night (and are actually considering a textbook on monks!), I would direct you to something else. But, hey. Whatever foats your boat.
0Comment| 17 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on September 8, 2015
An excellent scholarly history of the development of Catholic monasticism. The book is 292 pages of text, not including a valuable glossary of monastic terms at the back. I usually don't go in for lots of pictures, but in this case I think the work would have profited with more examples of monastic art and architecture. There are only eight pages of photos included. For a book covering a movement that had perhaps the greatest influence upon Western art I think more visuals would have been good. Lawrence spends a lot of time on the influence of Charlemagne, St Benedict of Aniane, and Cluny. This was a big plus as these areas seem to go missing a lot in the huge shadow of the Cistercian and other later orders.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on August 21, 2006
Medieval Monasticism is a scholarly book, which keeps the readers interest and it flows well. I would recommend it to anyone who is interested in looking at the Medieval Ages from another point of view, enjoys learning about the different church orders, or mere someone finds the Medieval World confusing. I am a medieval history student, who enjoys learning about the military order and wanted to learn a bit more about monasticism as a whole and this book gives a great overview. A word of caution, this is a scholarly book and not a narrative. So, be prepared to learn.
0Comment| 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on January 13, 2002
Lawrence's work provides a good foundation for anyone interested in studying medieval Europe. He traces monasticism from its roots in the deserts of the Middle East to the great Cluniac and Cistercian monasteries of France. Unfortunately, he is biased towards Citeaux and focuses his book on abbots and leaders. If someone wants to learn about the average monk, read the Rule of St. Benedict. If someone wants to begin to understand the evolution of monasticism, then this is one of the best books out there.
0Comment| 5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on March 2, 1999
Lawrence provides a good general overview of midieval monasticism, it's foundations, it's institutions, it's role in the Church. I strongly reccomend this book as a text for midieval histroy courses, If you want to understand the culture of the middle-ages, you must understand the institution of monasticism, and this book will help you to do that.
0Comment| 4 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse