3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Fascinating Reflection on Tradition and Innovation, June 5, 2007
This review is from: The Megachurch and the Mainline: Remaking Religious Tradition in the Twenty-first Century (Paperback)
Written by a sociologist, this book considers the relationship between tradition and innovation. The churches Ellingson describes are not unusual; this process is occurring all around the world. Nor is the process he describes unusual; religious groups have always had to cope with changing social conditions and accomodated themselves in various and unanticipated ways.
The book is framed around the shift from "confessionalism" toward "pietism" by which he means the turn from focus on religious identity based on institutionalized rituals and beliefs to religious identity based more on individual experience and conviction. This in no way summarizes the book, but in the process he argues that contemporary forms of evangelicalism are connecting with the religious desires of many people today such that more mainline churches are using the symbolic resources they've developed. That creates an opportunity to examine how traditions within a particular denomination are negotiated in the face of new, innovative forms of religion emerging out of contemprary societal conditions.
I'm not Lutheran, so I have no particular quibble with the author's approach to Lutheranism. Rather, as an outsider who is fascinated by religion and social change I enjoyed this book. I guess I keep in mind that this book is written by a sociologist trying to understand particular dynamics in our contemporary world, not a pastor or seminary professor who is trying to affirm or justify a particular form of congregation or belief. The concepts and issues he describes are useful and important. And they certainly apply beyond Lutheranism to a whole range of religious groups today.
For more interesting books on social change and the impact of evangelicalism, I also recommend Gerardo Marti's
A Mosaic of Believers: Diversity and Innovation in a Multiethnic Church, another Marti book
Hollywood Faith: Holiness, Prosperity, and Ambition in a Los Angeles Church, and Donald Miller's
Reinventing American Protestantism: Christianity in the New Millennium.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Balanced look at Lutheran megatrends, October 1, 2007
This review is from: The Megachurch and the Mainline: Remaking Religious Tradition in the Twenty-first Century (Paperback)
This is a balanced look at what is happening in many Lutheran churches in today's megachurch environment. The author points out that some - not all - Lutheran churches that are moving away from the traditional worship style and historical liturgy are also moving away from the Lutheran confessions, and the centrality of Christ alone, faith alone, and grace alone. Contrary to what the previous reviewer says, nowhere does the author lament the loss of the traditional service, ethnic homogeneity, or its emphasis on education and intellect. He does point out that these trends are happening, but I can detect nowhere that he says they are good or bad. He does quote others who lament the loss of tradition, but to do otherwise would be to present a one-sided report.
Ellingson does lament the fact that some misguided Lutheran pastors have become more interested in numbers than in the central message of the Gospel, as spelled out in the Augsburg Confession.
Whether or not you agree with the author's conclusions, this is a fascinating look at different approaches to dealing with the decline of traditional mainline churches.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
A Testament to Empty Traditionalism, May 14, 2007
This review is from: The Megachurch and the Mainline: Remaking Religious Tradition in the Twenty-first Century (Paperback)
Dr. Stephen Ellingson promises to give us some answers as to why some mainline churches are growing in denominations that are in decline. In the midst of trying to answer that question, he gets sidetracked by mourning the fact that these growing churches have not maintained the "tradition" of [American] Lutheranism.
Ellingson consistently misuses two terms in his writing. He uses the word "tradition" when the proper term would be "traditionalism," and he consistently uses the word "pietism" when what he is often describing is "piety." These are not small errors; they lead to completely convoluted conclusions. After wading through 176 pages of a dismissal of American evangelicalism, church growth principles, church consultants, Willow Creek Community Church and Saddleback Community Church (he demonstrates no personal knowledge of nor any direct research of any of these), we get to the fifteen page conclusion where we finally learn:
1) His definition of the Lutheran "tradition" is: its "ethnic exclusivity" (i.e. Scandinavian and German)"; its "complicated liturgical service"; its "use of classical sacred music"; and its "emphasis on education and intellect."
2) That "evangelicalism and nondenominationalism are colonizing mainline Protestantism"; and
3) Pietism is defined by "individualism and experience, consumption and choice, pragmatism and efficiency."
I would directly respond by saying that:
1) Nothing has hampered the vitality of the Lutheran Church in America for the last thirty years like this list of what "Lutheranism" is about;
2) Lutheran Christians are the ones who coined the term "evangelical," and we should not abandon it too quickly;
3) These exact same defintions could be used to describe those who doggedly insist on the church pleasing no one but themsleves by maintaining traditionalism ("the dead faith of the living") over the true Lutheran tradition ("the living faith of those who have gone before us").
What's easier (more "pragmatic and efficient"), to do the same liturgy from the same hymnal week in and week out, or to experiment with new forms and music to keep the faith vital?
Ellingson is correct in saying that some of us have "decentered the Lutheran tradition." We have placed at the center of our churches the person and work of Jesus Christ, the only true center of any "evangelical faith." We have decentered ethnic exclusivity, a complicated liturgical service, our exclusive use of classical music and our emphasis on education and training. We have recentered on Jesus and reaching out to people from all walks of life, church backgrounds (including no church background) and socio-economic classes. We have recentered on the Word and Sacrament. We have recentered our worship to celebrate God's mercy as greater than our failures and God's goodness as greater than our giftedness. This has led us to a livelier worship than Dr. Ellingson remembers from his youth, but it's hardly "rock and roll." We have recentered on equipping and training that leads to a lived faith and a Christ-following discipleship - hearts as well as minds. Guilty as charged.
Dr. Kent Hunter rightly points out the radical difference between those churches who were founded in American or have adapted to an American context rather than insisting on maintaining their "European" orientation, and concludes that this is one of the factors affecting growth or decline today. Dr. Eddie Gibbs has helped us see there are no "mainlines" anymore - only "oldlines" and "newlines." We are pleased be to be numbered among the "newlines." Their writings are helpful; this book is not.
I know some people experience all change as loss and grief. Dr. Ellingson is grieving the changes that are taking place in a church from which he became inactive "during most of my graduate school career" and had become "somewhat alienated from the institutional church." Like many traditionalists, Ellingson has made the crucial error of baptizing his personal tastes and memories, and has created a book that will only serve those final, "faithful" few [traditionalists] who will to narrowly define American Lutheranism with their congregation's final breaths.
Pastor R. Kevin Murphy, D. Min.
Saint Matthew Lutheran Church
Walnut Creek, CA
(aka "Pastor John Lincoln" of "Faith Lutheran Church")
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No