25 of 29 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
This Memnon Wasn't African - That's a Different Story., October 19, 2006
The "Memnon" the Reviewer named "Dazjae" is referring to in his review (see below) is not the same one found in this book. (The Review in question has since been deleted, either by the reviewer or by Amazon. I am leaving the first portion of this Review up for now though in case any others might make the same mistake.)
This book is about the historical Memnon of Rhodes (a Greek) who fought against Alexander the Great.
The Memnon that the reviewer "Dazjae" has confused this book's protagonist with is a mythical hero in a Fantasy/Sword & Sorcery series set in ancient Africa that is entitled "Shades of Memnon" - Book One being written by Gregory Walker (a series that has gotten excellent reviews). The only association here is the name being used.
Dazjae obviously didn't read Oden's "Memnon", or for that matter even the description of it presented here. Had he done so he would have avoided this mistake, avoided giving this book an unfairly bad rating and most importantly, avoided accusing this author of historical inaccuracy/dishonesty (to say the least of implying intentional "ethnic manipulation").
I'm posting primarily to offset the rating impact caused by Dazjae's mistake and to correct his error lest it unfairly hurt this book's sales (accusing an author of changing a character's ethnicity from African to White isnt exactly going to leave a good impression on potential buyers who may be unfamiliar with the subject and believe the comment).
About the book itself -
I have read both "Memnon" and Oden's earlier work "Men of Bronze." I liked the latter a little more than this one, but that doesnt mean Memnon wasnt good - it was. Its style was just as fast paced and engaging as Men of Bronze, and again showed Oden's ability to move the story with and within the history, rather than let it get bogged down by it (too many writers of historical fiction have a tendency to not know how to blend historical details into their stories without resorting to the "speed-bump" effect - sudden stops for clumsy info-narratives). The fact that Memnon provided a different angle to an era usually written from the Alexandrian perspective made it especially worth reading, since the viewpoint on this often written about ancient era was the reverse of what is normally seen. Seeing Alexander as the enemy rather than the hero put quite a different spin on things. Those interested in Alexander and this time should like this book even just for that reason alone.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great Reading!, January 9, 2007
After reading Scott Oden's "Men of Bronze", I was very impressed with his characters and writing style. "Memnon" did not disappoint me. The book was very pleasurable to read, holding interest, and followed a good historic, but fictional, line. I felt as I was transformed into an identity of that time and was participating in the story, seeing the battles first hand. "Memnon" is great reading for those of us who like ancient world studies and wish to settle back and enjoy reading a book that makes the camera roll in your mind!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Well Crafted Historical Fiction, November 11, 2006
I liked this book a lot: the writer took the minimal historical information that is available about Memnon of Rhodes and wove it into one of those wonderful epic novels that are cinema - like in scope. Everything works well: good characterization; excellent story telling and a good writing style. I enjoyed Oden's first book, "Men of Bronze" and trust that he will continue to provide readers with this type of literate, yet action packed stuff.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No