Most Helpful Customer Reviews
60 of 70 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
WEAK COLLECTION OF GENERIC PRAISE FOR LENNON, December 1, 2005
This review is from: Memories of John Lennon (Hardcover)
"Memories of John Lennon" should have been a new, exciting narrative of John Lennon's life with Yoko Ono -- chocked full of new insights and details, BUT IT'S NOT. There is not one scrap of biographical information in this book.
Instead, the book is bland collection of generic praise for Lennon from various musicians and other celebrities (Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr are glaringly absent). The majority of the entries, many from celebrities such as Bono and Carly Simon, follow a predictable pattern in which the contributor notes Lennon's sharp wit, remembers a small personal kindness and sadly suggests that we could sure use a man like him today. Some have never even met the man, like Nils Lofgren. Some of the recollections have been cut-and-pasted from old interviews, like Elton John's, giving the book a trashy, opportunistic feel. I was dismayed to see Elliot Mintz was included in this book because of his cruel criticism of May Pang - or perhaps that's why he IS included.
A lot of the praise for Lennon is devoted his solo hit "Imagine." I agree that "Imagine" was a great song, but Lennon wrote others, didn't he? I assume that Beatles' masterpieces like "A Day in the Life," "I Am the Walrus," "Nowhere Man" and others were deemed off-limits for some reason.
I admit that I am a Lennon memorabilia collector and I put this book on my wish list before it was even published. Let me give some advice to other collectors out there... This one isn't worth the money -- wait for it to land in the inevitable bargain bin!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
24 of 26 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Shameless, June 18, 2006
This review is from: Memories of John Lennon (Hardcover)
Memories Of John Lennon, "edited" and introduced by Yoko Ono. I put that word in quotes because I'm skeptical that this book was edited at all.
A real editor might have reminded contributor and onetime activist Tariq Ali that "Revolution" was a single, not an album.
Ali also writes of the day Lennon died:
"I think the tribute [John] would have loved was the spontaneous grief in Moscow as kids rushed to the Lenin hills and sang "Back in the U.S.S.R."
Yes, if I were John Lennon, I'd love it if people grieved for me by singing a Paul McCartney song, too.
Ali shares pride-of-place for ignorance with of all people, Ray Charles, who makes a similar mistake about "Yesterday."
The book as a whole overflows with gushing, largely unearned sentiment. If it was just another one of those things it would be bad enough but it's also absolute psychic head for Yoko.
Person after person: Yoko was the love of John's life; as an artist, Yoko was 30 years ahead of her time; the only possible reason one can be critical of Yoko is if one is racist or sexist or probably both.
I'm not saying some of it isn't true. I'm not one of those people who thinks Yoko was the devil (it's just that she couldn't sing). I'm saying it's unseemly for someone to include all that stuff about themselves in a book.
When they're not scubbing clean The Perfect Story of John and Yoko, the contributors are rewriting their own personal history as well. Or staking their claims to their own part of The Lennon Story.
Jann Wenner tells (again) the story of putting Lennon on the cover of the first Rolling Stone and conducting his lengthy interview with John. What he omits is that Lennon was furious with Wenner when the interview was published as a book against his express wishes.
Donovan's piece turns out to be about how, as he remembers it, he taught Lennon to finger-pick...and suggested the design for "The White Album."
It gets two stars because there are one or two nice things. But for the most part this is more of the revionist, there-is-nothing-nasty-in-John's-life deification of the man that has forced me to the following position:
Never trust anyone who says their favorite John Lennon song is "Imagine." They're drippy people.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
46 of 55 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Memories of JohnandYoko, December 25, 2005
This review is from: Memories of John Lennon (Hardcover)
I bought this book with happy anticipation. It seemed like a good idea: a collection of essays by different people, remembering John, published 25 years after his untimely death. I had seen a similar collection of statements many years ago, soon after John died, and that one was moving. But I overlooked one important thing: this book was edited by Yoko Ono.
Why the 2 star rating? The book itself is good quality and has a few nice pictures. And some of the essays are nice such as the ones by Mick Jagger and Elliot Mintz. However too much of the material is of poor quality for different reasons.
The book smacks of one of Yoko's popularist art projects. It appears as if she invited a bunch of people, some who never met John and who probably know little about him, to send in an essay so they can get their name in print. An essay by Alicia Keyes is nice, but she didn't know the man. How could she have a memory of John? As a result, several essays repeat the same unimaginative theme: we liked John because he wrote Imagine. We never met him but we like the song because he sang about brotherhood and peace.
Other essays are so short as to be meaningless. Some contributors sent in amateur drawings or poetry. This may be fine for an elementary school project where a teacher tells her 7 year old students "write a poem or do a drawing about John Lennon" but, to me, this is not worthy of a hardcovered book obstensibly published to honor John Lennon.
Another problem with this book is the same problem mentioned by critics of the Lennon Broadway show: the Yoko-fication of the Lennon legacy. While many of the essays address John alone or John as a Beatle, I could not help but notice that many of the essays not only discuss John, but practically deify Yoko. We learn from these essays that Yoko was the love of John's life; that she was a talented artist; that her genius wasn't appreciated years ago, but that Yoko was 30 years ahead of her time; that people did not appreciate Yoko because she married a Beatle; that Yoko did NOT break up the Beatles; that Yoko had a tremendous positive influence on John, etc. Did I mention that Yoko was the editor, and thus had a say in which essays were chosen for publication and which were not? It seems obvious that the "deification of Yoko" was a factor in choosing certain essays.
While I enjoyed the contribution by Elliot Mintz, he goes into great detail about The Lost Weekend, and mentions different people John saw and places John visited. But not one mention of May Pang. No, just like in the Lennon Broadway show, May does not and did not exist. Did I mention that Yoko was the editor of this book?
Many different people made contributions to this book, but oddly there is no memory of John essay by Julian, Sean or Yoko herself. One would like to think that John's second wife and sons would have something special to say for this 25th anniversary offering. Not one word.
And just in case you've forgotten who the brilliant editor was of this masterpiece, Yoko is mentioned on the front cover, the back flap, wrote an introduction, and has a full paragraph in the back of the book describing her "accomplishments" as a musician and artist.
My suggestion? If you are a fan of Yoko Ono, you will appreciate this book. If you are a Lennon or Beatle fan, you may wish to take it out of your public libary or buy a second hand copy at a discount, but otherwise, skip it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|