Customer Reviews

Memory and Abuse: Remembering and Healing the Effects of Trauma

5 star:		(5)
4 star:		(1)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

This is a closely-reasoned, scholarly, and somewhat clinical book. Not an "easy read" by any means (it has over 700 reference endnotes!). Well-done charts and lists do help make a great deal of information more manageable. That said, I found it gripping, because he describes my own experience of both trauma and healing so accurately. There is good information on post traumatic stress disorder and its relationship to sexual abuse. He addresses the debate over "false memory syndrome" extensively and, I think, quite well. Throughout, his tone is compassionate and engaged. As both a survivor and one who supports others in their journeys to wholeness, I highly recommend Dr. Whitworth's book for clinicians as well as survivors and those who support us.

Charles Whitfield is compassionate toward the survivors of sexual abuse. He addresses the effects of PTSD. He validates the memories of survivors, and blows the lid off the "False Memory Syndrome" which is actually not a valid psychologically substantiated syndrome at all. He also exposes the history of False Memory Syndrome Foundation--a "foundation" that will accept anyone who is accused of committing sexual abuse against a child and was founded by parents who were themselves rightly accused of sexual abuse. Hat's off to Charles Whitfield. He has once again provided help and compassionate insight which will aid in the healing of child sexual abuse survivors.

I picked up this book with a keen curiosity, as it came to discuss about the difference between the ordinary memory and the traumatic memory, the causes, and how one can heal those traumatic memories. Whitfield also addresses the issues of the "false memory" syndrome and the claims of FMSF, which was the highlight during the early 1990s, which, by the way, I had never heard of.

On another note, I personally like the part about how author talked about false self and true self where one is experiencing a trauma, a false self becomes created and takes over and the true self goes into hiding (since the true self didn't know how to deal with the trauma in the childhood years).

"Memory and Abuse" by Charles Whitfield is well-written and easy to read. It is also a very interesting book and worth a read, in my opinion.

I have read "Boundaries", also by Whitfield, and find this to be a good follow up. However, this is a different type of text in that Whitfiled is taking a position and constructing an argument in favor of that position. I read this book when I was in my 6th month of recovery (ACA). It helped me because it described what happened to me. A year ago I would have thought Whitfiled was nuts and "buried memories" was a load of crap. They are real--I have had them.

I read - and reread - Memory and Abuse when it was first published. It quickly became one of the most important books in my "recovery toolkit" - primarily because the author provided a large amount of important, verifiable, practical information in a format that continues to be easy for myself and other abuse and trauma survivors to read and digest. Despite newer books that are based on more up-to-date research, Memory and Abuse will continue to be a valuable resource for adult survivors who choose to develop a deeper understanding - and acceptance - of themselves, and their challenging recovery process.

After hearing all the hype about "false memories" of abuse, this book clarified everything I needed to know about trauma memories. Authoritative.

I hear there are now over 65 databased studies that prove how traumatic amnesia exists.

I had mixed feelings about this book.

Dr. Whitfield does his best writing when he is explaining his theories of traumatic memory and repression. He uses clear verbal explanations and diagrams to explain his assertions. He summarizes a vast body of theoretical work and makes extensive use of footnotes.

I was also interested to read his views on the False Memory Syndrome Foundation. (FMSF) He provides some background information on members of this organization that one will not find in their literature.

However, I was disapointed in the lack of objectivity. Although he explains his theoretical assertions well, he is a "true believer." He dwells more on the flaws of cases and research that disagree with his point of view. He is much less critical of material that supports his point of view. His footnotes are of uneven quality. It is often not clear which footnotes reference carefully done research and which are simply the assertions of a popular book author.

I felt that his definition of a dysfunctional family is too broad. He asserts that the vast majority of families are dysfunctional. Thus most individuals are wounded and should be in a recovery program. I was particularly disturbed by his critique of the American jury system, "Judges and juries have inherent deficiencies. A jury is a group of from six to 12 people who come from the general population, of which about 95% has been estimated to have grown up in an unhealthy, troubled or dysfunctional family and a troubled world. Most judges and members of juries will thus be unrecovered adult children of a dysfunctional family and world..." (p. 211) I too am sometimes frustrated by court decisions, but Dr. Whitfield's extreme view on this matter has worrisome implications.

He asserts that only a small minority of therapists have actually unduely pressured their patients into false memories. He may be right, but I think that he could go further to acknowlege some of the excesses that have occurred in the recent past.

On the positive side, he gives clear guidelines for informed consent when a therapist is embarking on trauma work. He cautions against delving into memory work without first taking a thorough history. He also gives cautions about confrontations between a victim and an alleged abuser.

All in all, I am glad I read this book. However, Dr. Whitfield hurts his case by his bias. He would be more convincing if he were more even handed in his presentation of data.

This is anything but an even-handed approach to the issue of trauma, particularly in the case of repressed memories of childhood sexual abuse. The principle reason I have given it more than one star is the fact that while the author ignores one side of the debate (except for the purposes of setting up a what Logic 101 would term a "straw man") he does quite well in covering the bases (and more) on his own side. Were one to this book in conjunction with another, the arguments of which were equally biased yet well stated, one might have a decent basis on which to form an opinion. A good example of a similar pairing might be to read Lenore Terr's "Unchained Memories: True Stories of Traumatic Memories, Lost and Found" along with Elizabeth Loftus' "The Myth of Repressed Memory." Neither are quite as unbalanced as this particular work but perhaps this may lend them more credibility.