Most Helpful Customer Reviews
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Entertaining plot driven thriller, June 15, 2009
Customer review from the Amazon Vine™ Program (What's this?)
You are either going to love this novel or not like it at all. Meg Gardiner writes in a style that is very fast paced, based on an exciting premise and provides a thrill ride type journey. If being on the edge of your seat due to the action of a novel is enough for you then you will love this book THE MEMORY COLLECTOR. Sadly, if you like your thrillers to contain deep psychological profiles of the characters then this book will not be for you. From main character forensic psychiatrist Jo Becket to the other major characters and the minor ones as well we only get to know them a little bit. They all have a purpose and a standard background but there is very little depth to them. They are needed to carry the story and that they do very well. Actually this novel is what one would call a perfect BEACH READ. It is an exciting page turner that demands not much concentration from the reader. The author does leave you guessing and the ending is satisfying but I can't help but wonder what Meg Gardiner would come up with if she concentrated on psychological development of her characters. She handles the plot aspect skillfully. If she could add the same quality to the characters she would raise her standards to another level. But I do recommend this novel if a plot driven book is what you are looking for.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Would someone please bring back the old Meg Gardiner???, July 13, 2009
Customer review from the Amazon Vine™ Program (What's this?)
Meg Gardiner is the author of an excellent mystery/thriller series featuring Evan Delaney, an attorney in Santa Barbara. They feature compelling, nuanced, true-to-life characters and fascinating plots with lots of suspense. She's also written, prior to this book, one so-so work featuring her new fictional creation, Jo (Johanna) Beckett. The premise of Jo's career -- she does forensic psychological examinations, exploring how and why people end up dead and commit crimes -- is quirkily intriguing. But in both the first book in the series and more acutely in this one, what could be a wonderful basis for a series of psychological suspense thrillers, becomes instead a device that enables Gardiner to write a much more mindless action thriller novel. Having read her earlier novels, she could have written a livelier, more thriller-like PD James-style novel; instead, she seems to have decided to move in the direction of James Patterson. And with Patterson and his team of co-writers turning out a new novel every six weeks or so, we don't really need that many James Pattersons... As the synopsis discloses, this time around Beckett is roped into evaluating Ian Kanan, a security consultant who has been mysteriously contaminated with something that means he'll never be able to form new memories. The plot revolves around the nature of that mysterious stuff, and the race by Kanan to save his wife and son and the other race, by Beckett and her boyfriend (a parajumper/theology student??) Gabriel Quintana to find the bioweapon that has destroyed Kanan's life. A good thriller should be like riding a rollercoaster -- the ride is so good that you're relishing every second of it. The other hallmark of a good suspense story is that when elements of implausibility are injected into the book to keep the adrenaline pumping and the reader frantically turning pages, these are never overwhelming. Gardiner tiptoes close to the edge on violating rule #1, and goes way over when it comes to #2; much of plot defies credulity. A great thriller artist was Hitchcock, who loved to place ordinary people in extraordinary situations. The key to his success was knowing exactly how many improbable or extraordinary things his viewer was prepared to accept on faith, and in what circumstances. It's a lesson Gardiner needs to learn, as she delivers one extraordinary scenario after another. This problem, already evident in the first book in this new series, becomes far more acute in its successor, where character takes a definite back seat to whiplash plot devices. It took me three efforts to read this book completely, and I finished it only because I kept hoping for the signs of the old Meg Gardiner. With the exception of her skill in drawing the personality of Jo Beckett, they just aren't there. If you want a good California thriller, go back to Gardiner's earlier books (such as China Lake: An Evan Delaney Novel (Evan Delaney Mysteries), Jericho Point: An Evan Delaney Novel or Mission Canyon: An Evan Delaney Novel (Evan Delaney Mysteries)). Or if you're looking to buy an extraordinarily good thriller, the second volume in Stieg Larsson's trilogy is now available. Both The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (Vintage) and The Girl Who Played with Fire offer extreme characters and situations, but they do it so well and so effortlessly that the result is a pulse-pounding, irresistible thriller of the kind that Gardiner seems to have walked away from delivering.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Below Average Thriller, May 22, 2011
I have read enough thrillers to understand that expecting good, detailed characterization is setting myself up for disappointment. So when I pick up a thriller, I look for an exciting plot, good twists and turns, and a likeable enough hero or heroine. Sadly, this book falls flat on most of those criteria. I liked the idea of a forensic psychologist as protagonist - I thought it would be fun to see such a professional at work. But Jo Beckett doesn't do much by way of forensic psychology in this book; instead she gets involved in a race-against-time to save the world from a sinister corporation and a deadly chemical composition called Slick (if you've read Vonnegut and remember Ice-Nine, think of Slick as Ice-Nine-esque). OK, not very believable, but I can suspend disbelief - but what I couldn't get past was the lack of originality of the whole thing, since anterograde amnesia was the subject of a quite good film from a number of years ago, MEMENTO, and this whole book felt like a ripoff of that concept. I also had a problem in this book that I rarely have. The posse of bad guys is a bit like the Three Stooges; I couldn't ever seem to remember their names or who was who. And the female villain is really a cartoon - a feminist nightmare who's willing to wreck anything and everything to catch the man she can't have. Come on, Ms. Gardiner, let's have our women evolved to a certain extent instead of playing out those "Jersey Shore" stereotypes of women who'll do anything to get their man. I finished it but think I'll quickly forget most of it, probably because I felt it didn't offer me any reason to go back (or recommend). My biggest disappointment was feeling that the excitement with which I began the book was quickly sucked out of the reading experience. Since I hate to offer negative reviews without commenting on some of the positives, I can honestly say that the book's a quick read and that the hero/heroine are likable enough, and there's one good twist midway through. If you need a beach read this summer, I sure this one will do just fine.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|