Buy New
$36.01
Qty:1
  • List Price: $43.00
  • Save: $6.99 (16%)
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
Men and Citizens: A Study... has been added to your Cart
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Men and Citizens: A Study of Rousseau's Social Theory (Cambridge Studies in the History and Theory of Politics) Paperback – May 31, 1985

ISBN-13: 978-0521316408 ISBN-10: 0521316405 Edition: Reprint

Buy New
Price: $36.01
15 New from $36.01 14 Used from $12.48
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
$36.01
$36.01 $12.48
Unknown Binding
"Please retry"
Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student


Frequently Bought Together

Men and Citizens: A Study of Rousseau's Social Theory (Cambridge Studies in the History and Theory of Politics) + Political Thought and Political Thinkers
Price for both: $64.17

Buy the selected items together
  • Political Thought and Political Thinkers $28.16
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Series: Cambridge Studies in the History and Theory of Politics
  • Paperback: 268 pages
  • Publisher: Cambridge University Press; Reprint edition (May 31, 1985)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0521316405
  • ISBN-13: 978-0521316408
  • Product Dimensions: 8.5 x 5.5 x 0.6 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 12 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,561,340 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

' ... both original and stimulating ... solidly constructed and marked by a truly impressive grasp of Rousseau's elusive thought ... The excellence of this book is undeniable ... deserves the widest possible attention.' American Historical Review

Book Description

This book, first published in 1969, is widely regarded as one of the best studies of Rousseau's thought in any language. In it, Professor Shklar examines Rousseau's central concern: given that modern civilisation is intolerable and a return to the state of nature impossible, how is man to arrange his existence in society?

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

6 of 6 people found the following review helpful By Niklas Anderberg on January 23, 2011
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Judith N. Shklar's classic study was first published in 1969 and reissued in 1985. This paperback version is from 2009. Included is Shklar's preface from the 1985 edition and no further changes are made. It is widely regarded as one of the finest studies of Rousseau. And rightly so. In eminently readable prose and with a minimum of academic jargon, Shklar guides us through his complicated mental landscape. She convinces the reader that Rousseau's thought, which seems to abound in contradictions, nevertheless possesses an overarching coherence. In doing so, she deals with some of the prejudices many of us share. The first is the idea of a Utopia. Rousseau described two utopias; one was the family in a Golden Age, the other a Spartan city. As Shklar points out, they were at odds with each other and not attainable in the real world. But most importantly, this was never his intention. Rousseau was first and foremost a critic. His utopias were held up as mirrors of the evils of modern society. His often misquoted notion of a "return-to-nature" was never meant as a real alternative but as a critique of an oppressive civilization. In fact, he could sometimes come eerily close to Hobbes: "the pure state of nature (, which) is one of fear and suspicion, fed by ignorance." Here he sounds like a pessimistic misanthrope rather than a social reformer.
Consideration is, of course, given to Rousseau's notorious quarrels with a number of the philosophes, notably Voltaire. Contrary to Voltaire's reaction to the Lisbon earthquake in 1755, Rousseau held that one should not blame God for it, but rather mankind itself. After all, we had built all those crowded cities ourselves and were consequently responsible for any (to be expected) disaster.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?