Metropolitics: A Regional Agenda for Community and Stability (Revised Edition) [Hardcover]

Myron Orfield (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: January 1997 | ISBN-10: 0815766408 | ISBN-13: 978-0815766407 | Edition: First Edition

"No study provides greater insights on the causes and consequences of metropolitan polarization. And no study offers a more convincing policy agenda to achieve the political integration of cities and suburbs".--William Julius Wilson, Harvard University. "Myron Orfield's careful and thorough analysis of metropolitan development trends has renewed a vital metropolitan debate".--George Latimer and Donald Fraser, politicians.

--This text refers to the Paperback edition.

Editorial Reviews

Review

[Metropolitics] eschews both name-calling and urban handwringing to take a look at old geographies and new alliances in Minneapolis. [Orfield] acknowledges the demise of federal policies for cities. He understands the nation's destructive land-use practices and patterns and wants to reorder as well as arouse. Orfield's alternatives are political, but grounded in a broader landscape.... Metropolitics offers a lasso to join constituencies and enhance cities, not whip them. -- The Nation, Jane Holtz Kay

Product Details

• Hardcover: 244 pages
• Publisher: Brookings Institution Press; First Edition edition (January 1997)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0815766408
• ISBN-13: 978-0815766407
• Product Dimensions: 9.6 x 7.8 x 1 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.5 pounds
• Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,434,480 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Regionalism working in the U.S.!, October 18, 2000

By 

David C N Swanson (Charlottesville VA United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Metropolitics: A Regional Agenda for Community and Stability (Paperback)

October 2000

"METROPOLITICS: A regional agenda for community and stability" (1997) by Myron Orfield presents a convincing solution to a surprising array of problems. Americans hate sprawl, but they hate even more anything that they can find a way to label socialism. Orfield describes a system of regional government -- tried and tested by himself and others in Minnesota -- that promoters of corporate profit will have a difficult time pinning the pinko label on. Much of what Orfield thinks promotes sprawl are government regulations and projects of an undesirable sort.

Regional planning reduces competition among towns, counties, and neighborhoods that hurts them all. Without regionalism, taxpayers end up subsidizing sprawl and ghettoization. Companies play one locality off against another to find the biggest giveaways. Developers lobby successfully for publicly funded infrastructure in the hinterlands, and affluent (largely white) residents move out of downtown. Schools in the city become dominated by poor students, taxes are raised to subsidize the wealthy suburbs, and white flight escalates.

Orfield's book concentrates on the example of Minneapolis/St. Paul, but is applicable around the United States, and presents useful strategies for improving schools, creating affordable housing, and numerous other projects in addition to protecting the environment and quality of life. Orfield maintains that higher spending on schools in areas of concentrated poverty is pointless. What's needed, he says, is (aside from the elimination of poverty, and as a step in that direction) a redistribution moving some of the poor to the suburbs and some of the wealthy downtown. He wants to fight sprawl, in fact, by building affordable housing in the suburbs. This is because he sees a primary promoter of sprawl as ghettoization and white flight.

Of course, Orfield also wants to see denser construction, and argues that competition among localities drives the desire for less dense construction in hopes that it will produce more tax revenue than it produces demand for services. Regional planning can avoid this vicious rivalry, and -- by mixing housing of various prices -- can allow people to live nearer their jobs, thus cutting the costs of transportation throughout the region.

I think Orfield's point about schools is worth quoting a few passages. I, for one, am immediately suspicious of any assertion that what struggling schools need is not money. But this one I find persuasive:

"Schools are the first victim and most powerful perpetuator of metropolitan polarization."

"Few people realize that the central-city schools spend $7,060 per pupil. 15 percent more than any other group of districts in the Twin Cities. Spending on central-city schools is also high in Chicago, Atlanta, and many other cities throughout the United States. No matter where it occurs, higher spending does little to attract or retain middle-class students. The existing level of poverty and student diversity are overriding deflectors."

"'If you just fix the schools so the middle class will be comfortable, the city will stabilize,' reform advocates often say. This claim would be true if anyone knew how to fix monolithically poor schools. School reformers, like reform advocates for cities, rarely take into account the effects of concentrated poverty on schools -- effects that are fundamental to how attractive these schools appear to the middle class."