The polymath Michael Polanyi first made his mark as a physical chemist, but his interests gradually shifted to economics, politics, and philosophy, in which field he would ultimately propose a revolutionary theory of knowledge that grew out of his firsthand experience with both the scientific method and political totalitarianism. In this sixth entry in ISI Books’ Library of Modern Thinkers’ series, Mark T. Mitchell reveals how Polanyi came to recognize that the roots of the modern political and spiritual crisis lay in an errant conception of knowledge that served to foreclose any possibility of making meaningful statements about truth, goodness, or beauty. Polanyi’s theory of knowledge as ineluctably personal but also grounded in reality is not merely of historical interest, writes Mitchell, for it proposes an attractive alternative for anyone who would reject both the hubris of modern rationalism and the ultimately nihilistic implications of academic postmodernism.
| |||||||||||||||
Book Description
Frequently Bought Together
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Mark T. Mitchell, who took his doctorate in political theory from Georgetown University, is Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Political Theory at Patrick Henry College in Purcellville, Virginia. He has written on Polanyi, Eric Voegelin, and Michael Oakeshott for various journals and is currently finishing a book on rootlessness and democracy.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
More About the Author
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.
Customer Reviews
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
17 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Probably the best available summary of Polanyi's writings.,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Michael Polanyi: The Art of Knowing (Library Modern Thinkers Series) (Paperback)
Until now, Drusilla Scott's "Everyman Revived" has for many been the most useful primer on Michael Polanyi's deep, rich and complex philosophical writings. Scott's book remains excellent, but Mark Mitchell's exploration of Polanyi's epistemology is more accessible and better organized.
Mitchell's book is useful to anyone interested in Polanyi. It serves as a very capable introduction to the ideas; anyone reading Polanyi for the first time will benefit greatly from having Mitchell's book close at hand. Likewise, scholars who have been wrestling with the nuances of tacit knowing will appreciate Mitchell's organization and his thorough coverage of the development of ideas in Polanyi's works. Mitchell offers exceptionally clear explanations of very complicated ideas, linking themes from among Polanyi's many works with helpful citations. He also draws connections among Polanyi and other writers who considered similar challenges, some of whom preceded and influenced Polanyi, and some who drew and expanded on Polanyi's ideas. I've already given this book as a gift three times, and surely will again. For anyone interested in the importance of tradition and liberty to the advancement of knowledge, this book is a delight.
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Deserving recognition for a mostly unknown giant,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Michael Polanyi: The Art of Knowing (Library Modern Thinkers Series) (Paperback)
This book serves as a first-rate overview of Michael Polanyi (1891-1976), a Hungarian physical chemist (would-have-been Nobel Laureate) turned philosopher of science, economics and societies. Generally unknown, Polanyi shouldn't be, and having been adopted by some on the Right, he might not remain anonymous for long. ISI publishers - who promote Conservative thought (but for their occasional Creationist forays, usually reasonably so, sometimes brilliantly) - have made Polanyi a member of their Library Of Modern Thinkers series (including Bertrand de Jouvenel, Eric Voegelin, Ludwig von Mises, Robert Nisbet, Wilhelm Röpke). Polanyi was a man of ideas, neither radical, nor absolutist, most concerned with Western modernity's general dismissal of tradition and faith grown out of an over-exuberant sense of empiricism's applicability in the human realm, leading to a brand of nihilistic skepticism, and worse - Postmodernism. Where "beliefs" are dismissed as not empirically verifiable, robbing humans of things they can know but can't prove (admittedly slippery terrain), and at least contributing to a denial of an I-Thou perspective as discussed by Joseph Campbell. To put tradition and faith on a more equal footing, Polanyi returns to the source of this superior attitude concerning science, to argue it's just as dependent on tradition, authority and (calm down, Postmodernists) a level of subjectivity - which, however, he finds a way to attach to concrete reality in nature (sorry, Postmodernists).
Our author provides a fine survey of Polanyi's life and its rather historic irony. Polanyi's economic analysis, favoring rationally regulated free markets preceded economist and Nobel Laureate, Friedrich Hayek's work, for which Hayek gave Polanyi credit. In 1944 Hayek's capitalist manifesto was published, "The Road To Serfdom" (a stimulant to Milton Friedman and Ronald Reagan). In that same year a staunch supporter of socialism published his own manifesto, "The Great Transformation". Its author none other than Karl Polanyi (Michael's older brother) who happened to encounter Hayek and von Mises (see above) in Vienna when Keynesian economics was king (the first time), before Kaynes read "Serfdom" taming his own theory. Unlike myopic pleas for socialism today, Karl's book is not so trifling. While Michael shelved science for philosophy loosing his shot at the Nobel, his son John (University Of Toronto) won it for chemistry ten years after his father Michael was gone. For Michael, his years in science were essential preparation, "An experience in science is by far the most important basic ground for developing philosophic ideas." Sadly, Michael's survey of life may not have been so grand as it should have been, "Today at seventy five my voice has not carried far; I shall die an old man as an infant prodigy." And a year later he did. It's interesting to note that brother Karl (and Marx) thought Enlightenment's capitalistic machinery was the dehumanizing force to blame for our woes, while Michael saw it as Enlightenment's hyper-rationalism overextended. Marxism's remaining anti-Western fragment, mutated in the form of Postmodernism, instead saw our problems as a failure of reason, desirous of eliminating it as Western bigotry. While Enlightenment appears to have initiated things, Postmoderns carried the flag in their usual self-contradictory manner through smug impersonations of rational dismissal, all the while opposing Western reason and rejecting Enlightenment. (Who says modern intellectuals in the humanities have no sense of humor?) Polanyi argues that knowledge is acquired by two kinds of awareness - focal and subsidiary (secondary), with our focus on the object of our attention while dwelling on secondary things in the background. For example, language: when reading we look through words to their meaning but tend to words and letters secondarily. A poorly written piece arrests our attention as we switch to focus on the words, struggling for their meaning, which suddenly become rather opaque. Acquired knowledge thus demands personal participation employing this focal/subsidiary method. This personal aspect makes knowledge particular (ignoring Carl Jung's universals due to common wiring in the brain) and subjective, making objective detachment impossible in actual practice. Satisfaction in knowing comes from ever deepening coherence with reality and promises indeterminate future manifestations. Hence allowance for revelations emergent from sound scientific theories not seen often for decades, developments of morality, or religion. Paralysis of subjectivity is removed because there is an external reality universal to all, which we approach with ever-greater coherence accepted by others if the insights deepen understanding (one assumes natural selection did not evolve our senses intending to deceive us - recalling humans have zero living interaction with Relativity or quantum mechanics). All knowledge, including science, depends on a tradition (which, Polanyi submits, need not be static, encouraging a degree of decent in the interest of truth) and authority (everybody learns from somebody) - traced to Enlightenment's reaction against corruption in the Roman Church. This reader can't help but suspect an apparent shortcoming equating the foundations of knowing science and religion in this way. While science provides testable agreement between observers (Polanyi is, after all, trying to loosen the empirical leash), could different religions really agree on religious universals? Doesn't "indeterminate future manifestations" split the flock, not providing greater coherence but leading if not to new denominations then a new religion altogether? Campbell's demonstration that at root all religions are the same, clothed in local dress, seems likely to hold limited appeal. Polanyi proposes integration of a dual perception, where a machine (or entity) - exemplified by a watch (or society) - is governed by two levels, those of physics and chemistry, and those by which they were put to use. Smash the watch and while principles of physics and chemistry persist, the comprehensive reality of the thing disappears with loss of that higher principle to which it was put to use (to tell time). While Polanyi does not make this comparison, strip away a common set of norms by which a people defines itself, subservient to a radical superiority of plurality or freedom from judgment and the comprehensive reality of communities composed of individuals is exchanged for atomized individuals with no community, governed only by rights, not responsibilities, bound by contracts rather than common sentiment. While as opposed to planning of science as he was to the economy (because both are far too vast and complex for a centralized entity ever to hope to grasp) and as a defender of science, Polanyi nonetheless submits that when a rigorous fidelity to science is coupled with a reductionist-materialist concept of reality then implications extend far beyond the realm of science, jeopardizing moral and political structures. If morality is but a convention, tradition mere inertia, God just a psychological necessity then society risks nihilistic listlessness. As liberty is the exercise of free will in the face of constraints, physical and moral, liberty is then also threatened. By eliminating the fact (empirically based) and value (not empirically based) divide, Polanyi seeks to provide allowance for ideals we may commit to such as truth, beauty and justice, what he calls intangible reality, more real to humans via their meaning and implications than tangible realities of science - so the charge on an electron is 1.60218e-19 coulombs?
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent for new readers or veteran Polanyians,
This review is from: Michael Polanyi: The Art of Knowing (Library Modern Thinkers Series) (Paperback)
This is a wonderfully clear exposition of the main strands of Polanyi's thought. I speak from the perspective of having read a number of Polanyi's major writings (Tacit Dimension, Personal Knowledge, Meaning, Knowing and Being) as well as introductory works by Drusilla Scott and Esther Meeks before coming upon this new overview. I like many features of Prof. Mitchell's book. One of these, especially useful for those already acquainted with Polanyi's own works, is a front-of-the-book bibliography with abbreviations that serve as references throughout the text. These references should also be valuable to someone new to Polanyi who wants to consult original sources related to specific topics of interest.
Second, is the clean writing, evidence of careful editing and - as important as anything else - the selections from Polanyi's own writings chosen to succinctly represent his views. Once confident of understanding, the new reader may be more comfortable to sample the original writings. It's not so much that Polanyi's writing style is difficult but rather that his ideas, developed as they were over time and in a wide variety of contexts, require one to do considerable sifting, summarizing and systematizing to make the fullest sense of them. But that's exactly where the author comes to our aid. He has done the work you would expect of a Polanyi scholar and the reader benefits from the clarity he brings to a wide range of issues that might otherwise be missed. Please don't read this as a warning to avoid reading Polanyi's own writing. To do so would be to miss his unique "voice" and miss the experience of "indwelling" (a key term in his theory of knowing) one of the great minds of our era. Finally, the book is well organized. A short preface sketches the features of the 20th century that framed Polanyi's life and provided the issues that deeply concerned him. Chapter 1 sketches his life and times giving us a sense of the trajectory of his life from brilliant research chemist to philosopher of science and politics. The remainder of the chapters summarize and show the relevance of his thinking on Economics, Science and Politics (Ch 2); The Tacit Dimension, his new paradigm on knowing (Ch 3); Meaning, Morality and Religion (Ch 4); and Engaging Polanyi in the 20th Century and Beyond (Ch 5). This final chapter contrasts Polanyi with other key figures of his times giving special attention to Michael Oakeshott, Eric Voegelin, and Alasdair MacIntyre. Chapter 5 (and the book) concludes with thoughts about Polanyi's legacy, particularly with regard to the 21st century postmodernist climate and issues that concerned Polanyi but remain unresolved or have taken new forms in our time.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
|
|
So You'd Like to...
|
|
