- Platform: Windows 2003 Server / 95
- Media: CD-ROM
- Item Quantity: 1
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
Microsofts .NET tools are very different from their predecessors. Visual C++ can still compile standard Windows executables, but the other languages all target the .NET Framework, a runtime engine and class library that manages memory and enforces security. Framework applications perform well, since they are compiled to native code at runtime, but there is an overhead in terms of memory usage and the Framework runtime must be installed. In compensation, .NET brings many advantages. All the languages are fully object-oriented, the class library is rich, and XML support is deeply integrated. ASP.NET is for web applications, and represents a large advance on the old ASP. Instead of script, ASP.NET supports any of the .NET languages, running on the server and just-in-time compiled to native code. There is a visual web page designer, and carefully designed applications support a wide range of browsers. A new feature in this version of Visual Studio is Mobile Web Forms, which use adaptive rendering to support the browsers in mobile phones and PDAs.
The database technology in Visual Studio is called ADO.NET. It uses a disconnected model, which means that applications work with data locally, only contacting the server for data transfer or update. Its a good model for laptops, smart devices, and wide area networks, but theres a lot to learn for those skilled in older database APIs.
The Visual Studio .NET Professional 2003 edition represents the best value in the range. Theres no Visual SourceSafe or Visio diagramming, and it lacks the server licences found in the high-end Enterprise editions, but its otherwise a fully comprehensive package.
For those wondering whether to make the jump to .NET, this release is probably the right moment to go ahead. The technology is maturing, and the inclusion of the Compact Framework makes the package more compelling. Students and newcomers to programming will welcome the clean object-orientation in C#, and the deep XML support on offer is essential for enterprise applications or integrating with other platforms. Its still important to note the heavy system requirements, and that .NET applications do not run on Windows 95. In most cases, the higher productivity of .NET languages soon pays for any additional resources. --Tim Anderson, Amazon.co.uk
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
20 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great Peice of kit,
By A Customer
This review is from: Microsoft Visual Studio .NET Professional 2003 (CD-ROM)
I've been working as a web develop for over 5 years, and I've tried hundreds of different editors and IDE. Visual Studio.NET is by far the most complete I have ever used. My boss' at first weren't too happy about forking out so much for one peice of software, but on the first project we used it for, we made the money back on a short development time and testing time.Because everything can be developed in more or less the same way as an ASP.NET app, we were able to offer clients more solutions for their buck. We now offer desktop and mobile solutions as well as what we offered before! The learning curve can be somewhat steep, but once you learn to do most things, everything will become a breeze.
30 of 36 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
STEP BACKWARDS but has bells and whistles,
By Crawford Leitch (burbank, CA USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Microsoft Visual Studio .NET Professional 2003 (CD-ROM)
I used Visual Studio 6 / Visual Interdev a lot and found it very good. I'm a decent VB programmer so I created several apps and managed our corporate website /sub webs with it too. I could do all that my business group needed. VS.NET 2003 has just made all that a lot, lot harder for not much gain. Aside from learning the new languages VB.NET and C# which I don't really mind the new asp.net and web site development is horrendous for people who do it all themselves. It was a lot simpler before. First time you try to delete a test project you won't find a delete option or anything in the help about it. It turns out you need to use explorer to delete the files and IIS to remove the virtual site. Why would they do that? In short the gains are mainly for the big enterprise users with 2003 servers running IIS6. $$$. Very disappointing really and I really like Microsoft stuff. Microsoft SQL server is fantastic for instance. Good luck and be prepared to study...
17 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good, but not Great,
By A Customer
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Microsoft Visual Studio .NET Professional 2003 (CD-ROM)
To put simple, this product is good, but it's not great. The true biggest problem is the complexity and learning curve. If your migrating from DevStudio, then you'll have a heck of a time learning the new environment and set up. But once you learn how to use it (which will take a while), it's much better than DevStudio, and the new languages are definately worth it.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
This product's forum
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|