The Mind of Jihad (Hardcover)

~ (Author)
Key Phrases: les frères, amoral supermen, modern jihad, The Mind of Jihad, New York, Middle East (more...)

Editorial Reviews

Review

"An unsparing study of Islamic Radicalism, anchored in the data and the histories of Islam's movements. Laurent Murawiec has produced a work of genuine and subtle learning, a book that situates Islamism in the broader context of millenarian movements the world over. I believe that this is a work that will make for itself a sure place in the Writings on Islamic Radicalism. An author at once brave and disciplined."
-Fouad Ajami, Johns Hopkins University

"Murawiec argues that the intellectual lineage of Modern Jihad goes beyond its proximate causes and alleged grievances; he shows that its ideological roots run deep in history, in culture, in heresy and in its affinity to the totalitarian ideologies of the twentieth century. His thesis will anger some and challenge others, but it will have to be taken seriously by anyone wanting to understand modern terror."
-Mark T. Clark, California State University, San Bernardino, President of the Association for the Study of the Middle East and Africa

"Laurent Murawiec draws on a remarkable range of historical, religious, ideological and ideational sources. The breadth and insight of his treatment deserve comparison with the work of Bernard Lewis, while breaking new ground in shaping our understanding of the contemporary jihad movement and in particular what Murawiec describes as, 'the etiology of such a love of death, a worship of blood, a cult of violence.' This is a sophisticated, original, yet highly readable book, unflinching in its description and analysis. Murawiec makes the case that the structure of violent jihadist ideology mirrors the millenarian insurrections that wreaked havoc in Europe from 1100 to 1550. Those movements arose under conditions of intense social dislocation caused by rapid change and which triggered individual and societal disorientation, anomie and loss of confidence in established religion and authority. By implication, some of the same deep societal impulses have been at work in contemporary Arab Muslim societies."
-Robert J. Lieber, Georgetown University

"Wars are first fought in the mind before they are fought on the battlefield. Understanding one's enemy, beginning with the fact that an enemy exists with intelligible world historical ambitions, is the first principle of war and peace. Laurent Murawiec's detailed The Mind of Jihad is a book many will not want to know about; it is too detailed, too sweeping, too accurate to leave much room for doubt about the nature and seriousness of purpose of those who in fact war against us with dedicated purpose. Murawiec writes clearly, frankly. His intended audience includes Muslims, Jews, Christians, Hindus, Chinese, and all, scholarly or ordinary, who seek to come to grips with the intellectual origins and purposes of the Jihad, including especially those who recently insist that the word cannot be used among us, its primary objects."
-James V. Schall, S. J., Georgetown University

" With its grim detail and relentless documentation of human cruelty and savagery, this is a difficult, but important book to read"
- Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management

"Readers find help in this timely book. It contains a proper diagnosis, without which there will not be a proper healing. According to Murawiec, jihad - fateful and shrouded in darkness - like a Sphinx transfixes us. The common analysis of jihadism in Washington, the author laments, suffers from being mono-causal and ahistorical. The expressions 'war on terror' and 'terrorism' merely focus on the tool, but fail to capture the essence of terror as continuation of politics and a system of power."
Wolfgang G. Schwanitz, The Middle East Journal

"Laurent Murawiec's The Mind of Jihad offers a different perspective. Discounting both the grievance and Islam-as-innately-violent models, Murawiec explores certain untapped areas of research in order to show correlations between radical Islam and any number of uniquely Western concepts and patterns, both philosophical and historical."
Raymond Ibrahim, The Weekly Standard and Middle East Forum

"While a comprehensive examination of Israeli society is beyond the scope of the book, the authors intend to provide the reader with some 'snapshots' of significant events, decisions, and developments that have played a role in Israel's ongoing search for self-identity. Specific attention is given to changing demographics and the interaction between the various segments of Israeli society that include national, ethnic, and religious groups. The authors also examine various shocks to the system, including the first and second Lebanon wars, the first and second Intifadas, and the peace process of the 1990s."
Maxwell Martin, Middle East Journal

"Terrorists are produced by a totalitarian ideology justifying terrorism. That is its 'root cause.'...This, then, is the book for those who wish to explore the 'root cause' in the ideas that give moral legitimacy to Islamist terrorism...Murawiec's research into the working relationship between the Soviet Union and Islamism is original and startling...The Mind of Jihad takes the discussion precisely in the direction in which it needs to go if we are to understand and prevail in this new war of ideas."
-Robert R. Reilly, American Foreign Policy Council, Claremont Review of Books

Product Description

This book examines contemporary jihad as a cult of violence and power. All jihadi groups, whether Shiite or Sunni, Arab or not, are characterized by a similar bloodlust. Murawiec characterizes this belief structure as identical to that of Europe's medieval millenarians and apocalyptics, arguing that both jihadis and their European cousins shared in a Gnostic ideology: a God-given mission endowed the Elect with supernatural powers and placed them above the common law of mankind. Although the ideology of jihad is essentially Islamic, Murawiec traces the political technologies used by modern jihad to the Bolsheviks. Their doctrines of terror as a system of rule were appropriated by radical Islam through multiple lines of communication. This book brings history, anthropology, and theology to bear to understand the mind of jihad that has declared war on the West and the world.

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Hardcover: 350 pages
• Publisher: Cambridge University Press; 1 edition (October 13, 2008)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0521883938
• ISBN-13: 978-0521883931
• Product Dimensions: 9.3 x 6.2 x 1 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (9 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #803,745 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

60 of 62 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Their own words, November 9, 2008

By	Ralph H. Peters (Washington, D.C. area) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

A reviewer should focus on the book, not celebrate his own prejudices and bigotry--as the previous reviewer of this book has done. Has he even read it? This valuable, cooly rational work is not a rant of any sort, but a careful historical analysis, based upon decades of studying the background material. Author Murawiec does not impose his own pre-formed views; instead, he does exactly what a serious researcher should do: He allows terrorists and the extremist thinkers who formed their beliefs to speak in their own words. Upon hundreds of occasion in this book, we hear the chilling, to-the-point (of the sword) writings, pronouncements and sermons of radical Islamist thinkers over the centuries. The author does, in my view, a brilliant, pithy job of describing how certain streams within Islam (not Islam as a whole) have constructed their own deviant theologies of death. Does the previous reviewer object to we, the people, hearing what our enemies have said for themselves? If we are ever to get beyond the totalitarian prejudices on both the extreme political left and right in our own country, it will be because concerned citizens read and think about serious works such as this (no mind develops if fed only comfortable, unchallenging food). And let us remember: Over the centuries and unto this day, the all-or-nothing fanatics who have afflicted Islam have killed far, far more Muslims than they have killed non-Muslims. The problem isn't faith, but fanaticism that corrupts faith. On a lesser level, unfair reviews scribbled down in a fit of political pique only make things worse. If we are unwilling to hear that which is uncomfortable, it will be far more difficult for us to do what is right. I strongly recommend this book for serious readers.

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars A flawed and meandering work, but some real gems among the stones, August 31, 2009

By	Matthew Smith "Roger Mexico" (TN USA) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

The first chapter in this book simply falls flat due to the author's casting of an overly broad net, and then trying to fit his evidence to his conclusions. The author uses Browning's Ordinary Men to compare and contrast the differences between violence from Muslims and Christians. The problem is the comparison in his context is not appropriate. The Einsatzgruppen was comprised of a wide variety of disparate men from differing backgrounds. Most of these men were recruited or drafted into their service and very few knew what they were going to be asked to do and even fewer volunteered. The Muslim extremists he compares them to, on the other hand, are voluntarily committing these acts. These men are not drafted, but instead seek out this violent confrontation. For this very reason the two are not appropriate comparisons. Furthermore Murawiec fails to acknowledge that in Browning's study he found that a certain percentage of men from the Einsatzgruppen showed no moral qualms at all with their new found duties. In fact a certain percentage seemed to relish the torture and brutalization of their victims. In fact Browning's own research actually contradicts this author's very assertion. The author either completely missed the point of Browning's book, or he has misused or taken him completely out of context for his own purposes.

The other main problem is the author is overly broad when discussing the different types of Muslim violence. He uses contemporary violence in the forms of the videoed executions and suicide bombers with state violence and public executions. The problem with this technique is that it melds the two different forms of violence into a single strand but they are vastly different. On the one hand he uses the violence from the Muslim Brotherhood to make his case, and then he turns around and shows violence emanating from the state to put down what he would consider terroristic violence form the Muslim Brotherhood by the Syrian government. By taking this overly broad approach all forms of violence can be used to prove his points, but his thesis becomes tenuous for this same reason. His use of public executions and its apparent popularity within Muslim societies as another fact that supposedly proves his contentions contains major holes because public executions have been just as popular in the Christian world throughout history as they are in the Muslim world. Not to mention the fact that these beheading videos received a tremendous amount of traffic in the US as well.

Chapters 5 and 7 were also very weak. While they did not fall as flat as the first chapter, they certainly seemed to add little to the book, and on the whole they seemed to be out of place with the rest of the work. They offered no real analysis at all, and instead seemed to degenerate into a simple historical overview of Muslim interaction with the totalitarian movements of the middle of the 20th century. The strength of this book is in the author's ability to go in and really analyze the radical movements, and dig out influences and trends to the evolution behind these movements. The author moved away from these strengths in these two chapters. While chapter 5 was somewhat interesting, it wasn't what I was looking for from this book.

Chapter 7, on the other hand, falls even flatter. The author gives a historical synopsis of the Algerian war for independence which takes up about a third of the whole chapter. The main problem is that he uses Horne's A Savage War for Peace as pretty much his only source, so if you have read that book then you might as well skip this part of this book since it relies heavily on his work. The other problem is that his rendering of this history dismisses a lot of context that refutes his conclusions. The author attempts to turn this war into a zero-sum game. Basically saying while both sides were bad the Muslims were worse thus proving his contention. The problem is it isn't a zero-sum game, and the violence from the FLN was not uniquely Muslim, but instead quite common to this type of conflict. The author doesn't take into account the years of colonial rule where the Muslims were largely left to languish on the peripheries of society. They were left in stasis with little improvements in their lives and many barely able to survive. What the author fails to mention is that colonialism created the situation in which these FLN thugs could flourish. Had the colonial regime cared to give back or attempt to improve the lot of the natives at all then perhaps the whole terrible history could have been avoided.

The rest of chapter 7 and 8 seem to have the same type of failings. They tend to dismiss the broader context of violence and terror around the world. The West has cultivated violence and terror itself for its own purposes.

With that said let me discuss what I liked. Chapter 2 and 3 were very strong. The author does a magnificent job discussing where the currents of radicalism emanated. What I really found elucidating is the author's discussion of the millenarian movements, and his comparing those movements with the Islamic movements that bare such a striking resemblance to these movements. This really created a whole new perspective for me from which to look at this sort of radicalism. His use of Gnostics and his compare and contrast methodology of looking at all Gnostics really helped me to understand the wellspring for this sort of radical ideologies. What the author does well is to show where these influential Islamic thinkers logic leads. What I found fascinating was the author taking the reader step by step through the process whereby these men like Qutb can conclude that the vast majority of the world is apostates, and it is his divine role to eliminate all of these people. One of the main points I came away with is just how dangerous these people are for everyone. Basically according to their beliefs very few are true believers and the rest of us are to be eliminated. Whether Athiest, Jew, Christian or Muslim these people are a threat to all of us.

Chapter 2 was a bit surprising. I had never assumed there was such a connection between Russian nihilism and radical Islam, but the author's analysis of both movements was eye opening. The way in which both set themselves up above the rest of humanity, and assume that they are the sole arbiters of truth which gives them the right to destroy anything and everything is frightening. I simply never would have seen the connection.

All in all this is a good book with some major flaws. The book changed the way that I will forever look at the Islamic religion. I feel as though I have a much deeper understanding of radicalism of all strains. This book made some important connections for me that will further my understanding and open up a whole perspective in my continuing education. For these reasons I tend to overlook some of my very real problems with this book and score it a 4 star instead of a 3. It is a deeply flawed work, but chapters 2,3 and 4 by themselves are worth the price and the time spent on this book. Despite its problems I do recommend this work.

18 of 27 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars The Mind of Jihad and the Mindlessness of Mr. Enright, November 15, 2008

By	Matthew Devlin (Boston, MA) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

Mr. Preston C. Enright,

I'm afraid, sir, that you are not a little confused by the words Customer Review. In fact, if i may say so, you seem downright flummoxed.

It appears that you've decided that Customer Review is merely code for: Forum To Spout Trite Adolescent Morally Relativistic Anti-American/Corporate Sub-Michael Moore Lefty Piffle and Provide Links To Same So As To Appear Well-Read.

Of course, by using a Customer Review to point this out I suppose I'm not entirely blameless myself. Evidently I see Customer Review as code for: Forum to Son Trite Adolescent Morally Relativistic Useful Idiot Lefty Mooncalf Whose Ill-Informed Views Are Only Excusable If He Is A Freshman. AKA Mr. Enright.

Alas, it had to be done.

P.S. Mr. Enright, you neglected to add links to books about how Bush is like Hitler and 9/11 was an inside job. Must have slipped your mind.