A Mind for Murder: The Education of the Unabomber and the Origins of Modern Terrorism [Paperback]

Alston Chase (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: May 2004

"With its unusual emphasis and sometimes surprisingly personal tone, this may become the definitive Kaczynksi volume."—Publishers Weekly

This is a radically new interpretation of the life and motives of the infamous Unabomber. Alston Chase's gripping account follows Ted Kaczynski from an unhappy adolescence in Illinois to Harvard, where he was subject not only to the despairing intellectual currents of the Cold War but also to ethically questionable psychological experiments. Kaczynski fled academia to the edge of the wilderness in Montana, but Chase shows us that he was never the wild mountain man the media often assumed him to be. Kaczynski was living in a book-lined cabin just off a main road when he formulated the view of the world that he used to justify murder. Through Chase's compelling narration of the planning and execution of Kaczynski's crimes, we come to know a thoroughly cold-blooded killer, but one whose ideas were uncannily close to those of mainstream America. Originally published in hardcover as Harvard and the Unabomber.

Editorial Reviews

Review

A chilling and provocative account of what made the Unabomber tick. (Boston Globe )

Fascinating and revealing. (Chicago Tribune )

About the Author

Alston Chase is a writer and independent scholar specializing in intellectual history. He lives in Paradise Valley, Montana.

Product Details

• Paperback: 448 pages
• Publisher: W. W. Norton & Company (May 2004)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0393325563
• ISBN-13: 978-0393325560
• Product Dimensions: 8.2 x 5.4 x 1 inches
• Shipping Weight: 12.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #726,481 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

17 of 20 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Well Done, December 28, 2005

By 

Jason Nelson "musshin" (Kansas City, MO USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: A Mind for Murder: The Education of the Unabomber and the Origins of Modern Terrorism (Paperback)

Mind for Murder is an excellent book by Alston Chase. This book has two main components to it. The first component deals with the life and demise of Ted Kaczynski. The author gives us descriptions of Ted's early years as a child, his high school years, and spends a great deal of time expounding on Ted's time spent at Harvard.

In the author's description of Ted's early years we our shown Ted grew to despise his parents pressuring him to excel academically. His resentment was especially strong toward his father who seemed to remain aloof and somewhat nihilistic till he committed suicide. Ted also resented his mother Wanda because he felt she intentionally subjected him to psychological abuses as a child. These feelings seemed to stay with Ted and even grow as Ted embarked on his college career.

The second component of this book is a cultural analysis that centers around the time period Ted would have been at Harvard and proffers reasons why Ted and others in our modern times have felt the need to resort to terrorism. The author explains how Universities like Harvard used to place a strong emphasis on liberal arts education. Education that was paired with moral virtue. This way of thinking is found in the thoughts of the ancient Greeks who thought reason had to be bound with moral virtue. However, in the 1950s with World War II just having ended and the Cold War looming the universities seemed to adopt the stance of logical positivism. The idea that if something isn't scientifically verifiable it has no meaning. In other words, moral judgments are just the cultural attitudes of the time. Ted would have encountered this line of nihilistic thinking at Harvard. Is it any wonder in later years he would adopt and expound his personal philosophy to mean any ends justified the means? This is especially poignant considering moral judgments to Ted seemed to be just a bunch of efforts at psychological control by the system.

Chase later gives us insightful details of how Ted was used at Harvard by Henry Murray for a psychological experiment. Ted and some other Harvard students at the time were participants in an experiment to submit these persons to dreadful psychological interrogation experiments. The Govt. at this time was very concerned with finding out how to treat or even coerce political prisoners into doing what they wanted. Even going so far as to study and try to learn how to keep the masses under control. Chase gives us historical insight into the Govt. intentionally trying out "new" drugs like LSD on college students, prison inmates, and anyone else it so fancied because surely the Russians had a secret "mind control" drug like this to coerce confessions out of POWs. Ted resented his being tested (even if he was being paid for it) and came to view the techno-industrial system as guilty of imposing unnecessary suffering on the masses. Mind control, feeling like a cog in the machine, depression, irritability, lack of leisure, pollution, were all some of the things Ted blamed on the techno-industrial system. The only way to stop these unjust grievances was to lash out against the system. Even killing if necessary which is just what Ted did.

This is a sad book in some ways but it's a more important work in many other ways. It tells what happens when value gets subjugated below reason. It tells how the culture suffers when ideas like deconstructionism, logical positivism, and structuralism so permeate our culture that nothing has any meaning. Until academics and the culture in general start accepting the fact that reason is only half the puzzle; there is always yin with yang, objectivity with subjectivity, and mind with matter in any accurate depiction of reality. Until we understand these principles and adopt a more holistic approach to reality we are perhaps bound to repeat these same mistakes-the devaluing of society to utter meaninglessness. Worst of all, the suffering of innocents by acts of terrorism and the dependence on antidepressants will continue to be a prominent part of life.

12 of 14 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Necessary, July 1, 2004

By A Customer

This review is from: A Mind for Murder: The Education of the Unabomber and the Origins of Modern Terrorism (Paperback)

Though Chase does seem to suffer a need to attack what he views as the outcome of "value-free" education, I do not think the book suffers as much from this insistence as does the previous reviewer. In fact, there is much to be gained from such a study.

Chase's book is an admirable study of both the Unabomber and the postwar currents that converged to contribute to the making of the Unabomber. Thankfully, Chase is wise enough not to offer excuses for Kaczynski's actions, but his research into what made Kaczynski "tick" provide a believable backdrop and a necessary antidote to the popular misconception of the Unabomber as a madman devoid of reason or motive.

And rather than finding fault with Chase's attempt to tie the Unabomber's actions and theories to those of other "terrorist" groups, I found his arguments convincing, especially in regards to the pervasiveness of the positivistic, supremely rational curriculum of Western universities and the devaluing of the humanities.

We need more thinkers and researchers like Chase who are willing to make us question our kneejerk reactions to men who make us as uncomfortable as Kaczynski.

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars A Mind for Murder, June 14, 2011

By 

Casper Denck (United Kingdom) - See all my reviews

This review is from: A Mind for Murder: The Education of the Unabomber and the Origins of Modern Terrorism (Paperback)

In this study Chase, a former Philosophy Professor, carefully compares the public image of Kaczynski with what is known and what Kaczynski himself has revealed and finds the public image wanting.

The popular perception of the Kaczynski is of the ex-professor rebelling against technological society - a political activist of a green-anarchist stripe. It was this perception that led to Kaczynski's name being put forward as a write-in candidate in the 1996 US presidential campaign. For these and many others Kaczynski was a heroic and often lone figure standing in the way of technological progress and its accompanying societal technological disintegration. Chase reports that to this day Kaczynski maintains a high level of written correspondence with such folks. In Chase's revisionist account such ideological kinship is to a large extent developed after the fact. But this is not just a biography - although, to the extent that it is it is also a biography of Chase himself for as the author often points out, Kaczynski was not one of a kind but a social phenomenon.

A Mind to Murder is also a book about education and, rather more tenuously, terrorism. Chase's argument plays itself out in two arenas: the biographical and the pedagogical. Chase surveys Kaczynski's early life, his excellent academic record (he was according to Chase an almost bona fide mathematical genius) and his rebellion against the expected career path in academia (I will expand on this a little later) and his decision to move to rural - although emphatically not wilderness - Montana. Front and centre of this aspect of Kaczynski's story is, quite rightly, his crimes - his intent to murder, oftentimes arbitrarily. Apologetic surveys of Kaczynski's life do not make up for 16 injuries and three fatalities his actions caused.

What Chase does very well is extricate Theodore Kaczynski the academically brilliant but otherwise decidedly average man from the Unabomber `Othering', namely the media invention of a complete loner divorced from all social interaction. It is the second main thesis of the book, namely the pedagogical focus, that explains why a philosopher has taken an interest in Kaczynski. This plays itself itself in two ways - the culture of despair of 1950s academia and the psychological - and bullying - tests Kaczynski was subjected to by Harvard faculty whilst a student there. It is the latter in which Chase has made both his most convincing argument and most suspect argument.

The former relates to Chases account of the psychological experiments Kaczynski experienced by psychologists working for Henry A Murray, a psychologist pivotal in development of psychological profiling. These experiments were, if Chase's account is to believed amount to little short of mental torture in the truest sense of the term. And, put simply, it is quite conceivable that an already toubled individual would be pushed over the edge by what Murray conducted with ostensibly no pastoral aftercare. In the process Chase recounts the fascinating although largely tangential account of academia's co-option by the US's Security Apparatus and its lack of critical distance.

But for all the tangents of the book, of which there are many, it is the figure of Kaczynski that is supposed to be its subject. It is strange then that although important clarifications to the popular portrayal that Chase makes the book is decidedly ambiguous regarding its opinion of Kaczynski's crimes: Is Kaczynski a mere murderer, or was the primary aim political vis a vis is kaczynski a terrorist? Certainly Kaczynski had political views and these views were the relayed in the course of his campaign but quoting Kaczynski's diary Chase suggests that Kaczynski's motive "was personal revenge", and that he did not "pretend to any kind of philosophical or moralistic justification" (p. 342). This is in keeping with Chase's broader argument in the book. In spite of this unless one deems terrorism apolitical (at which point the term loses its utility) how is it that Chase can later bluntly state of Kaczynski "He is a terrorist" (p. 360).

This is the failing of Chase's argument, surprising for a philosopher - inconsistency. This coupled with the consistent excursions into the history of US Universities make A Mind for Murder a harder work than it should have been. However, for all that Chase has produced what I am sure is the definitive account Kacynski's crimes. That however is not its central contribution - this lies in the post-morterm of the crimes where we discoverthat which drove Kacynski, the fear of rejection, need for recognition etc is decidedly normal. He may have been an Outsider (a la Colin Wilson) but he is one of many - he is not unique but a symptom of a wider malaise.