Customer Reviews

Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life (Radical Thinkers)

5 star:		(12)
4 star:		(1)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(1)

 

 

Although the Frankfurt School enjoyed some popularity in the US during the 1960s, its greatest writer never gained a following. Read this book and you may understand why: Adorno's thought is dense, allusive, and difficult to assimilate. It assumes quite some background in European, and especially German, intellectual history.

The right reader, however, will find Minima Moralia a tightly written, polished masterpiece. It is essentially a series of aphorisms in the style of Nietzsche. Adorno blends sharp observations about daily life in the 20th century with choice gleanings from philosophy, literature and history. The result is a unique work of cultural criticism that defies characterization or summary.

Almost every sentence of Minima Moralia contains a devastating insight into modern culture. Must reading for anyone who cares about Hegel, Marx, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Freud, and all related strands of thought.

Like Noam Chomsky, Theodor Adorno is one of those thinkers whose exposures of what society keeps hidden are so antithetical to received opinion, that they are either ignored or attacked by those who evade the actual issues at hand. While Chomsky uncovers hypocrisy and deception in international politics, Adorno cuts to the heart of alienated modern subjectivity, exploring the paradoxes and delusions of a world that most people imagine couldn't be otherwise. While his writing always carries a faint glimmer of hope that "things could be different", Adorno is largely pessimistic about the possibility of true freedom and reconciliation (in a Marxist sense) under the often absurd conditions of modern life. Now, this doesn't mean that he subjects "society" to vicious attack. On the contrary (and again, like Chomsky), Adorno speaks with sobriety and erudition. He's not afraid to interogate the customs and habits that are woven into the very fabric of modern institutions, charting their evolution and pointing out the relatively late development of many types of human interaction that are ordinarily dismissed as human nature, if thought of at all.
Adorno's dense, challenging prose can be difficult to digest in large portions. I made the mistake of beginning my exploration of his work with "Aesthetic Theory", which consists of 250 pages of undiluted thought, and no chapter divisions. The aphoristic collection of ruminations that is "Minima Moralia" is a much better introduction to this twists and turns of Adorno's thinking. As always, he uncondescendingly offers faithful transcriptions of his very thought processes, making things both difficult for the lazy reader, and more revealing to attentive readers able to hug the sharp corners at accelerated mental speeds. Adorno's critique centers on the alienation produced by commodity culture, where everything is reduced to a price tag, the complementary "administered" world, where all aspects of modern existence are mediated by government beaurocracy, and the shallow "culture industry" that dispenses the bread and circuses of corporate pop culture to superficially fill the void at the center of a "free" existence enslaved to capital. This book will hit some uncomfortable nerves, and sections here have the same potential to change one's life as David Edwards' "Burning All Illusions", a more psychological/political attack on the underlying societal assumptions that are uncritically accepted as given. However, unlike Edwards, Adorno sees no way out of the vast prison of alienation that precariously butresses the pervasive false consciousness of the modern subject. Potential avenues of escape are quickly dismissed as illusory products of man's false sense of freedom. Edwards doesn't pull any punches in his emphasis on the difficulty of escaping the myriad mental bonds of contemporary existence, but at least he pushes the reader to seek a better life beyond the superficial trappings that have all but smothered our apprehension of the big picture of human history. Adorno resigns himself to the small consolation of having diagnosed the sickness, while advising a low-key existence, afloat in a sea that is, nevertheless, recognized for its falsehood.
Ultimately, Adorno was a vital critic of what often goes unconsidered, not to mention a razor-sharp philosophical mind. While a master of unmasking the falsity of so-called first principles, he isn't without his own ideological givens: He relies far too much on the dialectical method of Hegel and Marx. Still, within the experimental controls provided by his subtly dogmatic ideological undergirding, Adorno provides ample food for thought. The hardline intellectual presentation requires the reader to operate at a level conducive to critical thinking, not only in relation to society, but in relation to
Adorno's thought itself.

...when it comes to praising this book. as a european refugee in this country, i feel that adorno's lucidity is almost uncanny. many times i read and reread one page, enjoying and deeply respecting his wisdom and intellectual courage, shocked by his insight. it is not an easy reading and it is mostly painful...but very, very rewarding. i love books more than anything, and i spend all my money and time on them, but until now i have not read anything comparable. the only other book i know of that offers such challenge and such solace is le mythe de sisyphe by camus. by the way, i hope the english translation is good, but i recommend to read it in german.

Adorno, at first grown up upper-class-protected, became acquainted with the horror only outside the family (his mother was a classical musician). Outside: on the school-yards, pursued and pushed by his peer group, because he always was teacher's darling. Outside: being a Jew walking on Nazi-streets of a pre-Hitler Germany with subtle racial discrimination. They soon would build Auschwitz. The same pattern, which at first as the contempt of mediocre school-gangs came into much too close contact to Adorno, secondly reached more painful intensity in the shape of the ideological constructions and daily realities of the National Socialism in the Third Reich. Though no one had a presentiment of the coming Holocaust, Adorno told, that the exploding of inhumanity did not astound him, after all that he had to suffer in the years before. Adorno fled to the U.S. for political reasons and because his father had Jewish roots. He worked in New York in the "Institute for Social Research". After exile (in the 1950s) Adorno returned to Frankfurt. He soon became a hero of the student revolts of 1968, but unfortunately students prefered a style of discussion and acting (Adorno's lectures were disrupted by bare breast girls), - a style of discussion and acting, which the (latent conservative) upper-class child Theodor Wiesengrund Adorno (called "Teddy" by the students) disliked in the beginning, in the middle and at the end of his life. His literary and philosophical masterpiece MINIMA MORALIA however is a testament of a razor-sharp philosophical mind, using an élitist, brilliantly aphoristic language. He continually followed the principle, that the only method to write nowadays is an essayistic, non-systematic, code word analyzing method, considering the fact, that big mega-philosophies (fascism, marxism ...) always tumble down after a while or seep silently, trickle away by the working process of dialectic thinkers. Since the attack against the World Trade Center in New York the understanding grows, that living in bondage with a false philosophy or a fundamentalist religion or an impudence nation (sometimes difficult to decide) nearly inevitably leads into a catastrophe. It is a maybe confusing but easily remembered coincidence, that Adorno's birthday is on a "September Eleven" (9/11/1903), duplicating the hint at the warning that ideological instigation gives rise to an escalation of terrible disasters. Like a Noam Chomsky or a grandchild of Nietzsche, Marx and Kierkegaard this German philosopher, co-founder of the so-called "Frankfurter Schule", provides with ample food for thought with his dense, challenging prose. But on the other hand he very lowly uses language as a poet, describing daily life and it's false consciousness: leading the view to Proust or Sigmund Freud, to "Golden Gate" or "Tough Babies", to cats or mammoths, to marriage and divorce, to "L 'inutile beauté" or "Wishful Thinking", to "Il servo padrone" and "They, the people": if you decide to read Adorno, you will forget the present world of violence and you will enter an inspiring galaxy of ideas. The modesty of Adorno's working method, trying to convince linguistically only by small artful steps, this could be a comfort-rich meditation assistance for those, who live in rough political and urban scenes ...

Though largely unknown outside of certain obscure academic circles, Theodor W. Adorno was, without a doubt, the foremost socio-political theorist of the 20th century. For truly intelligent, literate, questing minds (free of occultist nonsense) Adorno's MINIMA MORALIA is absolutely indispensible. A compendium of always eloquent, surprising, mournful, and deeply humane musings on modern capitalist society in all its terrible unfreedom, this book is among the most uncompromisingly radical ever written (cf. Max Stirner's THE EGO AND ITS OWN). To read and understand Adorno--even imperfectly--is to experience the tremendous pleasure of being in the presence of impeccable historical awareness, great moral rectitude, and visionary wisdom.

Adorno is a sort of Nabokov of the armchair left: elitist, haughty, immaculately cultured, cynical and despairing, and capable of penetrating aphorisms and sparkling metaphors.

This collection of brief meditations on life and culture under late capitalism is maddening, provocative, illuminating, opaque, invigorating, and dour-- and often all of these on the same page.

Adorno is a writer capable of keen insights and exquisite turns of phrase, and the book contains a half dozen aphorisms that will stay with me. But reading Adorno fruitfully requires a lot of prereading: references to Hegel, Marx, Freud, Nietzche, Goethe and lesser figures of German philosophy and literature are tossed around with little hand-holding. In the end, his arcane cultural references and dour, despairing worldview cast doubts in my mind whether his books are worth the trouble.

His insights into the more subtle mechanisms of domination and comformity that pervade our society are important, but are rendered with greater clarity by writers such as Gramsci, Reich, P. Goodman, Debord, Chomsky, Marcuse, and Postman, writers who align themselves more closely with social struggles to resist these forms of oppression and thus have a more measured, hopeful view of the possibilities for reconstituting society along humane lines.

Ultimately, Adorno offers no way out of the morass, only criticism of those who seek it. His outlook of despair and non-involvement serves only to justify his elitist, impotent musings on esthetics and philosophy, and offers little instruction for resistance. Perhaps this is why his writings are so avidly championed in graduate programs in the humanities. His followers would do well to take heed of the warning Adorno himself ran afoul of:

"He who stands aloof runs the risk of believing himself better than others and misusing his critique of society as an ideology for his private interest." (MM 6)

The paradox of Adorno is that he is known as a "difficult, complex, and hard to read" writer...but the typists at the Princeton Radio Research Project, at which Adorno spent a few unhappy years, found his work quite readable.

The administrators at the project found him difficult as a writer and perhaps personally because they were so embedded in the very system Adorno had identified ("the administered world") that they could not think outside its categories.

Although Minima Moralia does presume some knowledge of Continental philosophy and German literature, it is quite readable, entertaining, and at the close rather moving: its "finale" reminds me of the ending of Alban Berg's Violin Concerto.

Now, the "Logical Positivist" philosopher Rudolf Carnap has called philosophers like Heidegger and Adorno "musicians without talent." This shows a mistaken view of music (inherited from Plato) as at best entertaining sounds without meaning, and it fails to account for entertainment, which is taken as a primitive.

There is a musical quality in Minima Moralia but even as the informed concert-goer finds layers of meaning in good works, Minima Moralia rewards the patient reader.

Teddy would shudder at my saying this, but Minima Moralia is a good buy because it repays re-reading.

hmmm... where to start... The range of ideas covered in this slim volume is astounding. Adorno picks up an idea as a composer would a motif, eluciding the idea, though rarely dwelling more than a page or so on any given thought. Rather, he coaxes the reader to "enter in" to the thread of thought, allowing the reader to compare his or her experience of the world with those of the author, essentially incorporating the author's ideas into one's own worldview. What's truly amazing is how thoroughly Adorno is able to explicate an idea in the span of (usually) two pages or less. I cannot recommend this book vigorously enough.

This is one of the best books of nonfiction I have ever encountered in my life. I have read, reread, and reread some more each page of the masterpiece, some more than others. This book is something about which I am absolutely fanatical, something that Adorno probably would have detested. I have slept with this book under my pillow. I have quite literally hugged it like it was my Teddy Bear.

This is the only book that I find adequately responsive to the real issues confronting us today. Even though the intellectual frameworks upon which MINIMA MORALIA rest may be deeper and richer (i.e. the Hegelian system of philosophy), I have found nothing else of equal relevance to the world or to my own iterative sufferings.

Adorno's Minima Moralia is one of his characteristic texts-it is an extraordinary study of the contradictions of modern society. While Adorno's argument does not turn exclusively on a criticism of capitalism (whereas Marcuse's did), his work is clearly indebted to a mode of dialectical argumentation which exposes the thetic movements of our modern cultural situation. Adorno is a marvelous stylist-this text moves in Nietzschean manner through a dense web of cultural and political lineages and points to their corresponding symptoms. This is one of the singularly accomplished texts regarding the state of alienated subjectivity from the Continental tradition. A limitless and indispensable resource.