5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Interesting analysis of Chinese nuclear posture, June 29, 2007
This review is from: The Minimum Means of Reprisal: China's Search for Security in the Nuclear Age (American Academy Studies in Global Security) (Paperback)
During the Cuban missile crisis, the US had an order-of-magnitude numerical advantage in nuclear weapons over the USSR. Yet JFK and his close circle felt that there was strategic parity in nuclear weapons. In particular, the USSR had more than what Marshal Nie Rongzhen would term "the minimum means of reprisal".
Lewis argues quite successfully (it is not a hard case to make) that China has based their nuclear (and to a lesser extent strategic) forces with this phrase as a guiding principle: the score or so of ICBMs (and 100+ IRBMs presmably directed at Russia and India) China maintains certainly suggests that is the case. However, the notorious failure of the Xia-class submarine indicates that China has also had some measures of nuclear restraint thrust upon it by the shortcomings of its military-industrial complex. Lewis argues that China could field a larger nuclear force, but has chosen not to, and that the Chinese posture is motivated as much by the party's need for control over strategic forces as by any external factors.
None of this should come as a surprise, but it is still nice to have it all laid out.
The successful test by the Chinese of an antisatellite weapon (evidently after the book went to press, but not before its publication) in January 2007 bears some consideration when reading the book. Lewis goes on at some length about the Chinese efforts to "[prevent] an arms race in outer space", and cites the supposedly rudimentary nature of the Chinese ASAT program to support his arguments in a late chapter. Obviously these arguments have been undermined by the test, but the subtler point Lewis raises here is not: China sees a linkage between missile defenses and ASAT, and rather than attempt a nuclear "sprint to parity", it seems evident that China seeks to work asymmetrically, developing ASAT and information operations techniques with an eye towards (though probably not the present intent of) threatening the space-based component of a US missile defense, along with nuclear C2 and more general C4ISR capabilities. This is completely consistent with stated Chinese defense policy and PLA strategy.
I find that although I like this book, it is unusually difficult for me to find strong praise for it, and easy to find faint praise and minor flaws. The book is not particularly engaging, even for a wonk. It covers the nuclear stuff well, but would have benefited from exploring the linkages between nuclear and other areas more extensively. That said, it does its job efficiently. I would stress again that I do like the book...and simply say that if you have gone in for a penny by reading this entire review, then you should probably go in for a pound and read the book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No