If, like me, you are a baseball fan who collected baseball cards as a kid, you will find this account of the history of the baseball card industry to be a good read. It occurrs to me that there are characteristic differences between how a journalist and an academic approach a book like this (I'm assuming from his bio on the flap of the dust jacket that Jamieson is a journalist). With an academic, you are likely to get a rather dry discussion, but one that is thorough. With a journalist, you are likely to get a lively discussion, but one that leaves some holes in the narrative. Jamieson's discussion is certainly lively. He spends considerable time on some of the oddball characters who have been involved in the baseball card industry over the years. Getting to know something about these people makes the story more interesting, which is why journalists always include the "personal element" in a news story. If you want to write a newspaper article about an increase in foreclosures, you start the article with an account of the Smith family being forced out of their home. Only then do you give the reader the big picture. Jamieson takes this approach.
An academic is more likely to be concerned with nailing down all the facts, and adds color only as an afterthought. In a book like this, the journalistic approach is probably the better way to go. But there were a number of points where I wished Jamieson had taken more trouble with the facts. For example, he spends some time on the boom and crash in baseball card production and in the prices of collectible cards during the late 1980s and early 1990s. But I didn't feel I was getting the complete story. It would have been nice to have had some more details on how high the prices of particular cards went and how far they crashed. I was also a little unclear about the transition from the collapse in the mid-1990s to the current situation. What I can gather from the book is that since the mid-1990s, only older cards (pre-1960?) in excellent condition have much value. But for these cards, values have soared. I think that is what he is saying happened, but he never quite spells it out, focusing instead on giving accounts of the some of the big dealers in the current market. Similarly, he gives the impression that when Marvin Miller became director of the Major League Players Association, the MLPA had complete authority to negotiate contracts with baseball card companies. Was that really the case? Even though the photographs of the players show them in team uniforms, MLB had no right to receive payments from the card companies? When discussing more recent years, though, he gives the impression that both the MLPA and MLB negotiate (jointly) with the card companies. Seems as if the rules changed somehow. It would have been worthwhile to have straightened out this story. Finally, although he provides a Notes section that gives his sources -- somewhat unusual in a book like this -- the book does not have an index, which greatly reduces its usefulness as a reference.