Mirroring People: The Science of Empathy and How We Connect with Others [Paperback]

Marco Iacoboni (Author)

Book Description

Release date: June 23, 2009

Includes a new Afterword by the Author

What accounts for our remarkable ability to get inside another person's head--to know what he or she is thinking and feeling? Marco Iacoboni, a leading neuroscientist, explains the groundbreaking research into mirror neurons, the "smart cells" in our brain that allow us to understand others. From imitation to morality, from political affiliations to consumer choices, mirror neurons are relevant to myriad aspects of social cognition. Mirroring People is the first book for the general reader on this revolutionary new science.

Editorial Reviews

Review

"Want to learn what mirror neurons have to do with Super Bowl commercials, violent video games, autism, addiction, and even free will? This is your book."--Discover magazine

"Explaining how mirror neurons might change our notion of free will, act as neural precursors to language, and shed light on human empathy, Iacoboni nimbly takes us through the experiments that led to these findings."--Seed magazine

"Pioneer researcher Iacoboni balances technical detail with engaging historical perspective, humor, and idealism."--Library Journal

"To read this marvelously accessible book is to share Iacoboni's enthusiasm.... A book full of wonder and promise."--Booklist

About the Author

MARCO IACOBONI's research has been covered by newspapers around the country, and he has appeared on ABC Good Morning America, the CBS Early Show, and NPR Morning Edition, among other TV and radio programs.

Product Details

• Paperback: 336 pages
• Publisher: Picador; First Edition edition (June 23, 2009)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0312428383
• ISBN-13: 978-0312428389
• Product Dimensions: 8.2 x 5.4 x 1.1 inches
• Shipping Weight: 10.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (15 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #34,476 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

42 of 42 people found the following review helpful

5.0 out of 5 stars Implications of Mirror Cells: What They Are and Why You Should Know September 27, 2009

By Justin Adams

Format:Paperback

"Mirroring People" is a must-read for anyone interested in up-and-coming topics in neuroscience, or just as a cursory pick for a brain book. It is an extremely easy read; any medical jargon or procedures mentioned are clearly explained even for those without any prior knowledge of the subject. A big attraction of this book is that it provides a biological basis for, as the subtitle suggests, "How We Connect with Others."

Marco Iacoboni presents mirror neurons in the first chapter as the specialized brain cells in an area of the brain called the premotor cortex, which specializes in the planning and execution of actions. While conducting an experiment in which researchers were recording single neuron readings from monkeys, one researcher found that the neurons were firing (a term used when a neuron is being activated) when said researcher was performing an action the monkey was familiar with. One story has it that the researcher had ice cream and was in the physical act of bringing it to his mouth to take a bite when the neurons in the premotor cortex began firing. While this particular story is eventually debunked, that these cells were activated not only when the monkey was anticipating the action but when it saw others performing provided neuroscientists with an entire new area to study.

After describing what these mirror cells are, Iacoboni does a beautiful job of pinpointing experiments that naturally progress from this simple observation to the broad implications mirror cells have. The basis of mirror cells is imitation. One experiment Iacoboni cited involved two children that were placed in a room that was chock full of objects, two of each. What the experimenters found was that when one child but put on a cowboy hat, the other one would put the other cowboy hat on.... When one played with a particular toy, the other soon followed. This is the basis for his conclusion: imitation, thus mirror cells, is a critical learning tool that people need to interact with others.

Iacoboni cleverly sets this supposition against studies done with autistic children, where he makes the hypothesis that because autistic children are characterized by the inability to interact with others they must be deficient in mirror cells or mirror cell activity. Indeed, in some of his imaging techniques he finds that the areas of the brain that are normally associated with mirror neurons fire substantially lower than normal children given the proper stimuli. Since imitation is a key component of mirror cells and learning, the hypothesis was also made that imitation would help stimulate autistic children and act as a sort of therapy. Indeed, when this was put into practice, caregivers found that by imitating the stereotypically redundant actions of autistics, they were able to get their attention and interact and connect with the autistic children better.

The turning point in the book is when the author describes how mirror cells aid in self-recognition in the mirror. Around the age of two is when children begin to recognize that they are looking at themselves in the mirror as opposed to another playmate. This is the point where the implications for mirror cells become meaningful to how adults function and utilize these neurons.

One block of experiments demonstrated that being exposed to media violence increased aggressiveness and violent behavior. While this is a seemingly simple statement whether you agree with it or not, Iacoboni is insightful to enough to point out that this actually challenges our own perception of free will. If something as simple as watching violent movies and playing violent videogames affects our behavior, doesn't that mean we aren't completely in control of our actions (even though we're ultimately responsible for them)? This is still a hot topic for debate, but there is strong empirical evidence that the correlation exists.

Iacoboni ends by discussing how mirror neurons contribute to our political footholds and the larger cultural associations we make. By thoroughly going through experiments that set up the conclusions and assumptions made on this topic, Iacoboni presents a fascinating look at a new world going on twenty-years-old. Already, bold statements have been made, and if the author is only partially correct then the floodgates have only just been opened on the topic.

Overall, the book was worth every second of reading; it illuminated subjects that were previously completely foreign to me. It also put into words and science things I've noticed but never queried. I believe that there will be a lot more to come in this field, and hope that Marco Iacoboni is there to lead the way again.

The only thing I was left wanting at the end was more specific ways we can use the information presented. The mention of helping the autistic patients was a great revelation, but there is a lot more this field has to offer that I don't think was completely covered. Again, this is a new field and there will be ways that the knowledge is used that will be ingenious, but just a little more insight would have been a great addition.

I think one of the greatest reasons this book is a success and a great read is that it has been a labor of love for our author, and the reader knows it doesn't stop with the last word; Iacoboni intends on following through with this research and has high hopes for it:

"I believe we are at a point at which findings from neuroscience can significantly influence and change our society and our understanding of ourselves. It is high time we consider this option seriously." Read more ›

17 of 17 people found the following review helpful

5.0 out of 5 stars mirroring, empathy, and community December 5, 2009

By Donald Schell

Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase

As an Episcopal priest, founder of an innovative congregation ([...]), and now teacher and consultant to church leaders, I'm finding evolutionary and neurological studies of emmpathy and compassion a fantastically valuable contribution (and useful challenge) to stuck assumptions about what intentional human communities (like churches) are really for. The two best popular books I've found so far for this are *Mirroring People*, Frans de Waal's *Age of Empathy.* Both lay out arguments and experiments with a clarity that makes them accessible to a non Ph.D. reader who cares about empirical inquiry. Both are written so accessibly that I actually found them page turners, hard to put down. Both Iacoboni and de Waal come across as engaging, genuinely collaborative teachers who refuse to talk down to students (us readers) and who are passionate enough about their work and trust it and us enough to use accessible, non-jargony language and good storytelling. I've been steadily recommending the combination of the two books to interested colleagues.

22 of 24 people found the following review helpful

4.0 out of 5 stars Great, Fascinating Science...it's only that the writing is inadequate. January 7, 2010

By Warren R. Grayson

Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase

There are few people working on the science of Mirror Neurons today: Antonio Damasio (author of The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness and Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain), Giacomo Rizzolatti (author of Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language (Advances in Consciousness Research, 42)) and Vitorrio Gallese (author of Mirrors in the Brain: How Our Minds Share Actions, Emotions, and Experience) being some of the most prominent in the field. The work being done by these four men is widely cited throughout the field of psychology.

Iacoboni's book is useful for bringing the average reader up-to-speed on the research behind mirror neurons. My only complaint is that there is something off kilter about the writing style...I can't really articulate what it is other than to say that I felt as though I was frequently waiting for Iacoboni to get to the point. Perhaps it is because English is not his first language (I am not certain about this), but suffice it to say that I felt a certain kind of tension while reading this book. With that aside, I think this is a decent book and recommend it although I would recommend Damasio's newest book first - Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain....

As a last word, I really appreciate Iacoboni's last chapter the best; in this chapter he states this: "In my lectures on mirror neurons I often conclude by saying that our research should be called existential neuroscience. I say this because the themes raised by mirror neuron research map well onto themes recurrent in existential phenomenology." He later adds, "The existentialists have constantly reminded us that what is worth understanding and knowing is our existence, the human condition, and that engagement and involvement are superior to a detached stance. Mirror neurons are brain cells that seem specialized in understanding our existential condition and our involvement with others. They show that we are not alone, but are biologically wired and evolutionarily designed to be deeply interconnected with one another." It was in this last chapter that Iacoboni really did his best writing I believe. Read more ›

27 of 34 people found the following review helpful

2.0 out of 5 stars Very disappointing. September 8, 2010

By David M. Giltinan

Format:Paperback

I've run across so many non-fiction duds recently that I thought it would be helpful to make a short list of what I look for in a good non-fiction book. There are obvious additions or deletions, depending on whether one is talking about biography, current affairs, history or popular science. But for a book like this one, advertised as an accessible account of recent developments in an important branch of neuroscience, here's a short list of what I hope for:

# Context: give me a sense of where the material in the book fits in the overall scheme of things.
# Organization and signposting: find a reasonable scheme for organizing the material and stick to it. Tell me at the outset what you're going to cover, then cover it, then tell me again what the important takeaway message is.
# Establish credibility: be authoritative without being condescending or vain.
# Be intelligible: write clearly, and at a level that's appropriate for your target reader (note that this requires that you actually have a specific readership in mind). Avoid academic jargon as far as possible.
# Incorporate figures, graphs, and diagrams intelligently - this can often eliminate huge swaths of verbiage.
# Choose good examples. Ideally, they should grab the reader's attention, motivate the questions discussed and illuminate the answers.

Regrettably, Marco Iacoboni's Mirroring People fails to satisfy almost all of these desiderata. I found the book so annoying that I made it only two thirds of the way through....

Many of the problems can be traced back to the fact that Dr Iacoboni seems to have believed that, since he wasn't writing primarily for neuroscientists, it would be acceptable to:

# give perfunctory descriptions of experimental work,
# sum up results only in the vaguest of qualitative terms (effects are almost never expressed quantitatively)
# over-interpret data to fit pre-existing hypotheses
# fail to discuss limitations of experimental work, or give fair discussion of competing interpretations.

Judged as an overview of a body of scientific work, the book fails miserably. Note that I am not saying that the conclusions presented are wrong*. But the summarization of data is so vague that the reader is unable to judge whether or not they are valid.

This leaves one in the unsatisfactory position of being asked to take it on trust "from the expert". The problem there is that everything about Dr Iacoboni's style leads the reader in just the opposite direction - the way this book is written raises warning flags on almost every page. It begins with his hagiographic introduction to some of the key researchers in the area, all - not coincidentally - Italian like himself. Referring to them as the "Fab Four" was not a good idea. And this kind of blather only serves to antagonize the reader:

"maybe this talent for deep insight is why [he:]... reminds me of Albert Einstein"
"He is one of the 27 members of the exclusive Club dei 27 [...], wherein each member personifies one of Verdi's 27 operas"

Intuitions of these uber-scientists are "incomparable", "uncanny"; their talents are unique, special, almost not of this world.

"Now we can add neuroscience to the list of Parma's world-class exports."

I'm all for a little local pride, but there's such a thing as overkill. Most readers will be unable to suppress the eye-rolling reflex, the author lays it on so thick. And by the same token, Doctor Iacoboni, please don't keep dragging your daughter Caterina into the damned book. I don't care that she's in sixth grade, gets a lot of homework, is passionate about her ballet lessons; nor do I care about your wife. If you're feeling guilty that you may have neglected your family while working on this book, take them to Disneyland or something. Don't drag them in as bit players.

I wouldn't be anywhere near as cranky about the extraneous stuff that the author drags in if it weren't for the serious omissions. But failure to provide adequate detail about experimental results in a book that runs to 300 pages is a major defect. Also, is there some problem about figures and summary tables, criminally absent from this book? Almost every discussion of experimental work in the book could have been improved (and shortened) by a suitably chosen summary table or graph. It's really not hard. Even the newspapers are doing it nowadays.

I could go on, but you get the general drift. The book is an annoying mess, and I remain completely baffled by those reviews that described it as an "accessible account". Only if your expectations are very low indeed would this book not be a disappointment. Mirror neurons may indeed play a critical role in the future of neuroscientific research, but a decent, accessible account of their importance is still outstanding. This book fails on almost every level.

*: though conclusions about a putative link between mirror neurons and language acquisition seem clearly overstated; the imagined linking between single-cell results and imaging data appears based on little more than anecdotal data in a handful of subjects. The author remembers to include the mantra "correlation is not causation" every 20 pages or so; unfortunately he appears to take this as license to ignore it completely for the intervening 19 pages. Rampant speculation abounds. Read more ›