|
|||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
19 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Lots of money for no performance increase,
By John Doe (Earth) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Monster MC500HD-2M Standard Speed HDTV HDMI Cable (2 meters) (Electronics)
Please do some research on HDMI (or Monster Cables in general). Monster cable is a good product, but you can purchase other cables from other companies for 1/10th the price. As long as the cable is a quality cable the signal delivered to the TV is the SAME! It is a digital signal -not analog. Go to an unbiased audio video blog or review site and they will set you straight, but by all mean is you have the excess money laying around buy the Monster.
5.0 out of 5 stars
But It Lasts,
This review is from: Monster MC500HD-2M Standard Speed HDTV HDMI Cable (2 meters) (Electronics)
I am tired of buying cheapo hdmi cables that break down after a few weeks or months of use. I've bought very cheapo hdmi cables on the net and, yes, the picture and sound quality are the same as the most expensive Monster cable. But for every three I bought, one would arrive DOA and the other two would last weeks to months, but that's all. I have no idea why they stop carrying a signal, but they do. The Monster cables last. And that's worth it.
3 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Good brand, quality build but generics are equally good,
By
This review is from: Monster MC500HD-1M Standard Speed HDTV HDMI Cable (1 meter) (Electronics)
My suggestion and... I'm just saying: search Amazon for "hdmi cable 1.3" and make an informed price/quality decision before you buy.
Why would someone prefer a branded wire an not a more generic product that sells for a fraction of the price? I am sure that the marketing geniuses have the answer. In this specific case I am happy to see that this brand's pricing structure is coming closer to what most of the competition charges which is in the single-digits. The brand should make absolutely no difference on such short cable lengths if the cable actually works. This specific product is still selling at an unjustified (in my view) premium but I can understand that some would prefer a branded product even if it goes at the back of the box, never to be seen by anyone. HDMI is all-digital for both sound and picture. As such, it either works or it doesn't and, when it doesn't work, you will know immediately. There's really nothing in-between. If a claim is made that the Monster is 'more reliable' or that it 'lasts longer', I can't see how such claim can be backed - does the hundred-dollar cable last 20 times longer than than the five-dollar cable? And, if it does, do we REALLY care that a cable supporting a standard that may be obsolete in 5 years COULD last for 100 years? By the way, I do not challenge the claim of high quality for this cable. It appears to be well built. However, it is quality not needed and, in my view, not worth paying for. The way most of us use cables is: we plug them at the back of our electronic boxes and, if they work on 'day one' they are likely to work in the exact same fashion on day 1000 because they are not going to be subjected to any physical or thermal stress and the materials used to build them are not easily degradable. While 'quality' was important for analog cables where good quality made all the difference in the world, the digital wires either transmit the digits or they don't. If they do, they all work the same, the $1 HDMI cable gives you the exact same 'performance' the $100, gold-plated cable does. The claims that seem to suggest that these expensive wires allow more Gigabytes of data to pass through and the implied suggestion that you would get a less bright image or a less crisp sound if you used a two-dollar cable are NOT true. The HDMI is a published standard and there is a minimum data throughput that must be supported. If it is, then the device is HDMI compliant and you will get everything that HDMI promises to deliver. If some cable exceeds the specified throughput, it's nice but it's irrelevant because no electronic component that's HDMI compliant would attempt to push more bytes through the wire than the standard specifies. If they did, they'd violate the specs and would not sell very well. If your electronic component had an HDMI port that called for an HDMI cable that exceeded the HDMI published standards, then it would no longer be called an HDMI port but a proprietary, non-standard solution. NOTE This is from the HDMI consortium's FAQ: _______________________________________ Q. Will my Standard cable work in High Speed applications? Although a Standard HDMI cable may not have been tested to support the higher bandwidth requirements of cables rated to support high speeds, existing cables, especially ones of shorter lengths (i.e., less than 2 meters), will generally perform adequately in higher speed situations. The quality of the HDMI receiver chip (in the TV, for example) has a large effect on the ability to cleanly recover and display the HDMI signal. A significant majority, perhaps all, of the HDMI TVs and projectors that support 1080p on the HDMI inputs are designed with quality receiver chips that may cleanly recover the 1080p HDMI signal using a Standard-rated HDMI cable. These receiver chips use technology called "cable equalization" in order to counter the signal reduction (attenuation) caused by a cable. _______________________________________ My interpretation is that, when it comes down to cables THIS short (1 meter), just about anything will do and you can get fully certified HDMI cables for a fraction of the price. The Monster cable is 'high quality' without a doubt but it's unneeded quality because this cable won't be usable with HDMI 1.4 devices and a much less expensive wire will do the exact same job for you. By the way, I do understand the concept of branding but, for something that goes to the back of my stereo, never to be seen or heard from again once it's plugged in, the brand is not that important. 2115|RCDEQH6TWUUXR;2115|R3OTJ3UWN9CVD8;2115|R2H02885LV2NY4;
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|