Customer Reviews

Monster Cable SS2RF Monster Standard RF Splitters For CATV Signals 2-Way RF Splitter

5 star:		(6)
4 star:		(1)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(2)

 

 

If you are one of the "unlucky" that lives in an apartment or dont feel like shelling out the money to have a "DEDICATED" cable line running to each room (from the outside box) then a splitter will be neccassary. Even if you have a dedicated line, you might want to use one for picture in picture. Problem is the more you split, the more signal you lose, and this can degreade picture quality and internet speed. I have five different splits needed, four for TV, and one for internet, and even though my picture was pretty clear, my internet connection was getting lost sometimes, so I decided to upgrade my splitters. The cable company supplied me with ONE 2 way 1GHZ "Regal Splitter" and ONE 3 way 1GHZ "Extreme" Splitter. I decided to upgrade these to the 2 and 3 way Monster Standard 1GHZ splitter. (please stay away from the higher end, 2GHZ Monster Splitters, unless you have Satilite. The Monster Standard 1GHZ is more then suffience for Digital Cable, Basic "Analog" Cable, Internet, and HD TV. When I changed the splitters, I found the picture to be more Crisp w better colors and Detailing, and the HD never looked better. My cable modem has yet to lose its connection and my downloads are faster. Mind you, if you are having lousy reception problems, and you have a cheap splitter, and you change to this, and it doesnt work, chances are its the outside line, so have that checked first, before you drop the money on splitters. The simple call to the cable company (some charge a small fee) could be all you need. But if you are like me, and already have a decent picture, but with minor picture flaws, or lose you internet connection, try upgrading to these, as always Monster delivers, and their "Standard" products are all you need, even if its cables, they are more then sufficent

I purchased two Monster splitters to replace some RadioShack brand splitters I had on my home cable TV setup. One splitter resides outside my house splitting the cable between two TVs and the other splitter is inside splitting my TV and DVD player inputs.

I had replaced a few other components (cables) due to a less than perfect signal on the lower band stations (Channels 2 thru 6) and a couple of other stations on the higher end of the spectrum.

The new splitters made a difference. The low channels are now perfectly clear. I swapped the old and new splitters around in various combinations, but found that the two Monster cables produced a slightly better signal when just one was used and a great signal when they were used in unison. The splitters being replaced where not old, so it appears these Monster splitters made a difference.

Unless you have a need (satellite TV) I would stick with the Monster standard splitter and not spend extra money on their "premium" splitter. The premium model is about twice the price. The gold plating content is the same and its only the frequency range that is associated with satellite TV that would matter to you with the premium model.

So:

Cable TV: buy the Monster standard.

A Time Warner Tech told me that in order to get good reception from the lower and upper channels I needed a good quality splitter, not the cheap ones that you can get at Radio Shack (which I had used). Suspicous, I researched this and boy was he telling the truth! The SS2RF provided much better clarity and got rid of the distortion that I assumed was the fault of the cable provider. Definitely worth the extra money when you consider how much you already have invested in your AV equipment.

I've used RF splitters from several manufacturers and most have worked well. Does the Monster SS2RF give you a better picture then other competing brands of RF splitters that I've used? To my naked eye, I really can't tell the difference. The Monster splitter does yield a good picture, in fact the picture looks as good as if the cable was connected directly to the TV rather then to the splitter. So no visible video degradation as a result of using this splitter. I have settled on buying this unit because it certainly appears to be very well made which to me is an attraction in itself. Many competing brands have the appearance of a cheap product that I hesitate to install on my TVs.

I ordered it (1GHz) NEW through "Electronic Express". It had been repackaged into a container for a 2GHz splitter with Scotch tape. I don't know if it was used but it wasn't "new in box" (See customer images). The (1GHz) splitter I'd been using for 10 years performs better (doesn't pixelate) so I switched back to it and will never use the Monster. It's not cost effective to return it but it was $$$ well spent to verify the common theory that "Monster" gets a premium price for poor quality products. Amazon is awesome but Electronic Express has seen the last of my business.

I bought this Monter Cable SS2RF Splitter, to split my comcast cable. It worked liked magic!! I now have the internet cable and the TV cable coming from the same spot and the signal still strong! I noticed no signal loss.
Great splitter!

For the long haul these splitters are worth the money.The ones the cable companies uses will corrode and rust after a few years worth of use.I used mine to split one to a cable modem and the other to the living room tv.For analog,digital and internet these are worth the few dollars extra in the long run.

I'm not impressed. I think everyone falls victim to the "monster cables are greater than everything" bs at least one time in their life.

I purchased a no name splitter for about $1.00 and had better performance.

Used this product with motorola powered signal booster and it worked good. Removed about 80% of the static I had.

Provided NO better picture or reception than the typical 3 dollar splitter...and to top it off....the monster splitter failed after 3 months. It is a Taiwan product...and the monster cable brand does not offer any assurance of quality.