10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Parker book on Monte Cassino Superior-This is a perfect book for a WWII assignment- if you do not care for military history, August 6, 2006
This review is from: Monte Cassino: The Story Of The Most Controversial Battle Of World War II (Paperback)
If you are interested in the Battle of Monte Cassino "Monte Cassino: The Hardest Fought Battle of World War II" by Matthew Parker is the superior read.
Hapgood's book does not delve deeply into the combat and is hardly a military history at all. Instead it focuses on some German Officer who saved the art in the Cassino from Goring and the Allies.
Hapgood's focus was on "human interest" stories, which proved none to interesting for a reader who was seeking detailed analysis on the actual battle.
This book would be perfect for someone interested in the daily minutes of some guy sifting through ruins, stonewalling his superiors, organizing convoys and yammering away with Papal representatives.
Do not pick up this book and expect an in-depth treatment on the most "The Most Controversial Battle". For Hapgood's controversey lay within the realms of renaissance art and not the failure to support the brilliant French Offensive.
The composition of the colorful, courageous and multinational Allied Army, the formidable nature of the Cassino bastion, the fate of those caught in the villages, the miserable conditions and sheer brutality of the fighting are the subjects that require the most detail and research for a book on Monte Cassino that has any aspirations.
But the author instead cherry picked a couple topics and stretched them to the breaking point. And these topics were not particularly germaine to the conflict that claimed the lives of so many. He could have covered these issues of secondary and tertiary importance to the battle itself in a chapter or so. But it is the battle itself, the equipment, the geography,and the men under arms who get the abridged coverage.
I will concede if someone was really interested in Art History, and Nazi looting this book would be a compelling read. The prose is fine. It is the subject matter, emphasis and organization that are lacking. It would be a perfect book to read for a book review- provided student not interested in military history and has to somehow fulfill this requirement. Many do not share my zeal for military history and would probably find this book sufficient.
Hapgood's attention was riveted on matters he considered interesting and "controversial". If it was not so drawn out it would have been informative. But this myopic approach gave the short shrift to the fundamental components of the Battle of Monte Cassino. Human interest stories, no matter how compelling, can never outshine grueling and pivotal events in history.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A great read, July 30, 2009
This review is from: Monte Cassino: The Story Of The Most Controversial Battle Of World War II (Paperback)
I was looking for a book that detailed the human experience of this battle more than military strategy, and this was a perfect read. Well documented and well researched. The only thing I really missed was a detailed map of the area, which would have made the action much easier to follow.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4.0 out of 5 stars
A great read . . ., March 19, 2008
This review is from: Monte Cassino: The Story Of The Most Controversial Battle Of World War II (Paperback)
I've spent a lot of time in Roccasecca, where von Senger was headquartered, and Hapgood and Richardson really capture the feel of the Roccasecca to Cassino stretch in the Liri Valley. Augment with Matthew Parker's book (I'm a bit surprised how Parker leaves out Roccasecca, the Melfa River battle, etc.), and you'll get a most vivid picture of the Cassino battle.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No