Moral Combat: Good and Evil in World War II and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Buy Used
$7.90
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Used: Very Good | Details
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Eligible for FREE Super Saving Shipping! Used item in very good condition with clean, pristine pages.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Moral Combat: Good and Evil in World War II Hardcover – March 22, 2011


See all 10 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle
"Please retry"
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$3.95 $0.01

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 672 pages
  • Publisher: Harper; 1 edition (March 22, 2011)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0060580976
  • ISBN-13: 978-0060580971
  • Product Dimensions: 9.2 x 6.5 x 1.6 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 2 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 3.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (23 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #901,581 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Starred Review. A moral history of WWII would be brief, said one wit, but respected British historian Burleigh (Blood Rage: A Cultural History of Terrorism) delivers a long, riveting account of awful events and the perverted reasoning behind them. Communist, Nazi, Fascist, and Japanese systems claimed to be regimes of public virtue carrying out inexorable historical processes. Proclaiming that the only evil was obstructing this march to utopia, all discarded the rule of law and alternative moral authority (religion, ethics). The Holocaust and other familiar WWII atrocities top off an exhaustive litany of mass murder, brutality, and squalid cruelty perpetrated by governments, military leaders, local officials, and ordinary individuals who, acting without moral values, became monsters. Burleigh does not ignore Hiroshima and Allied mass bombing campaigns, but deplores the current fashion for balancing the moral books. All nations acted shamefully, he concludes, but denies that Eleanor Roosevelt's youthful anti-Semitism made America complicit with Hitler, as one recent revisionist implied. 16 pages of color photos. (Apr.)
(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.

Review

“A bold, blunt, and sometimes beautiful defense of morality in history . . . . Mr. Burleigh poses the moral questions to the people that mattered at the great turning points of a vast war.” (Timothy Snyder, The Wall Street Journal)

“Chilling. . . . A deeply researched and vividly written book.” (The Cleveland Plain Dealer)

“This is a superb work of scholarship with fresh insights on nearly every page that will likely leave the reader asking hard and troubling questions long after finishing it. . . . An exceptionally important book.” (The Christian Science Monitor)

“Burleigh has written a powerful, gripping book that will be essential reading for an understanding of World War II. It is worthy of anyone’s attention who is interested in that war.” (The Washington Times)

“Burleigh serves up an array of new interpretations which is not simply a new overview of the war, but rather an examination of the prevailing moral sentiments of entire societies and their leaderships.” (The Tucson Citizen)

“Michael Burleigh has long been one of our foremost writers on the importance of ethics in history, and in this deeply researched, closely argued and well-written analysis of the moral issues thrown up by the Second World War he has reached the zenith of his career.” (Andrew Roberts, National Review)

More About the Author

Michael Burleigh is the author of Blood and Rage, Earthly Powers, Sacred Causes, and The Third Reich, for which he was awarded the Samuel Johnson Prize.

Customer Reviews

Is not able to discern truth from opinion!
DerickMoore
I found that I often had to re-read a sentence several times, and even then was unsure of the message.
Eugene M. Smith
I recommend this book for WW2 history buffs to read and think about.
Syd Sutherland

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

61 of 67 people found the following review helpful By Mark Twin on April 4, 2011
Format: Hardcover
Halfway through the book.
Already enough to justify rereading, reshelving (to must reread) and recommending. There seems to be at this moment in history a glorious glut of uber-literate military historians: Norman Stone, John Keegan, Martin Gilbert, Ian Kershaw, Richard J. Evans, Richard Bessel et al, and Michael Burleigh seems in both his 'The Third Reich' and this 'Moral Combat' to exceed above all. Mr. Burleigh succeeds in making one gape and gasp in despair as he details, point after dread point, the terrible depths to which both individuals, whether dictator or general or field soldier, and groups will descend physically, mentally, and above all morally, in order to eradicate that with whom or with which they disgree.
This book is an anti-war book in the best possible tradition: it describes the daily disgrace perpetrated upon one man to another, justified by pact or privilege. It argues cogently for human understanding without once resorting to rank politic. It bemoans the fad of revisionism, of relativism, of reductionism. It is a readable and engrossing and a fascinating book.
3 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
34 of 39 people found the following review helpful By El Briano on April 6, 2011
Format: Hardcover
This (very lengthy) book reads like an extended essay, filled with acute, and sometimes controversial, observations on moral aspects of how World War II was prosecuted. Those looking for a more conventional, narrative history of the war should turn to the work of someone like John Keegan. At the end of the day, Burleigh doesn't have a whole lot to say that is particularly new, but his arrangement of the material, and the passion and erudition of his presentation, make compelling reading. His point of view is mainstream, British-centric, in line with writers such as Andrew Roberts and Max Hastings, and is a refreshing corrective to certain revisionist, moral equivalence points of view, which seek to tar all participants with the same brush. Burleigh's is a "warts and all" perspective on the Western allies, but he is clear on the essential moral distinctions that made this a necessary, if occasionally troublesomely prosecuted, war.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
76 of 97 people found the following review helpful By James Palmer on April 10, 2011
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
This is the kind of book that you read with both eyes open and a red pen to hand. It's very good in parts, but quirky, unfair, and weakly argued in others. Generally, it's strong on the Nazis and Soviets and weak on the Allies. As in his fantastic The Third Reich: A New History, Burleigh writes about the Nazis with raw contempt, which is one of the better ways of dealing with them. He's excellent on the venality of the regime, and at picking out telling details to illustrate guilt, like Manstein's request for watches torn from dead Jews.

The Soviet chapters get distracted by side-swipes against a nebulous cabal of left-wing historians but are good when he sticks to the issues. As for the Allies, the treatment of "hot-blooded" warm crimes and the resistance movements is ok, but the chapters on air power surprisingly tired. Allied atrocities get no personalization, their cost in life presented only in numbers.. Burlieigh also likes to make little ad hominems on the proponents of the other side (Bishop Bell's supposed vanity, for instance) and drag out the kind of silly or misplaced-in-hindsight comments everybody makes, while giving no such treatment to those he favors.

On the cranky conservative side, there's nothing as magnificently odd as the several-page rant about the Irish in Sacred Causes: The Clash of Religion and Politics, from the Great War to the War on Terror, but there is a lot of straw-manning of left-wing positions and refighting High Table battles from the late 1980s.
Read more ›
5 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful By William A. Howes on April 26, 2012
Format: Hardcover
It's difficult to bring up the topic of morality in terms of warfare, but then if it wasn't Michael Burleigh wouldn't have been compelled to write this book, I imagine. Besides, he demonstrates clearly it is a fertile ground for exploration.

The Axis to any surface examination of the war represent unmitigated evil, while the Allies represent qualified good.

Burleigh delves deeper, discussing the moral issues which arose in the prosecution of history's bloodiest conflict. Even beneath the surface, the Axis remain evil and corrupt upon examination, with the author focusing on the overwhelming scale of massacres of Jews, Slavs, gypsies, Russians, and others. The systematic conquest and further destruction and "clearing" of Poland for settlement is described in detail.

In their attempt to supplant the Western colonial governments in Asia, the Japanese get attention for their brutality, enthusiastically cultivated by the militarists who controlled the society. The Japanese would have had an easier time succeeding as a benevolent Asian colonial power, through their Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, offering leadership to their conquests, had they not casually and repeatedly unleashed their brutality on the people of the countries they occupied.

Little attention is given to Italy, led by Benito Mussolini, who even Italians referred to by derisive nicknames. Not that it matters. From Berlin, Hitler invariably called the shots. The other Axis partners had no input on decisions made regarding direction of the war. As for the Japanese, they would no doubt have been Nazi victims, had they not been of similar outlook, and, more to the point, so distant as to be irrelevant to Hitler's aims.
Read more ›
4 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews


What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?