2 Reviews
|
5 star:
|
|
(1) |
|
4 star:
|
|
(0) |
|
3 star:
|
|
(1) |
|
2 star:
|
|
(0) |
|
1 star:
|
|
(0) |
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review
21 of 23 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Imagining the Consequences
This is a very important book; though aimed at philosophers and the cognitive science communities, most general readers should enjoy it. Here are several quotes:
"[There is] a deep tension and dissonance within our cultural understanding of morality, for we try to live
according to a view that is inconsistent with how human beings actually make sense of...
Published on July 28, 1996
|
 |
8 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
no demonstration
Mark Johnson is a capable writer, who demonstrates the weaknesses of any moral theory that insists on absolutes. In a redundant manner most of the book is about this weakness. However, didn't we already know this? That absolutes were guidelines, helpful rules of thumb, but not always completely applicable. Still it is a very good review (why I gave it three stars). Yet...
Published on August 25, 2001 by G. Hilfiger
|
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
21 of 23 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Imagining the Consequences, July 28, 1996
By A Customer
This review is from: Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics (Paperback)
This is a very important book; though aimed at philosophers and the cognitive science communities, most general readers should enjoy it. Here are several quotes:
"[There is] a deep tension and dissonance within our cultural understanding of morality, for we try to live
according to a view that is inconsistent with how human beings actually make sense of things, I am trying to point out
this deep tension, to diagnose the source of the dissonance, and to offer a more psychologically realistic view of
moral understanding -- a view we could live by and that would help us live better lives." (p.19). "Narrative is not just
an explanatory device, but is actually constitutive of the way we experience things. No moral theory can be
adequate if it does not take into account the narrative character of our experience." (p. 11
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
no demonstration, August 25, 2001
This review is from: Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics (Paperback)
Mark Johnson is a capable writer, who demonstrates the weaknesses of any moral theory that insists on absolutes. In a redundant manner most of the book is about this weakness. However, didn't we already know this? That absolutes were guidelines, helpful rules of thumb, but not always completely applicable. Still it is a very good review (why I gave it three stars). Yet Johnson does not demonstrate that "moral imagination" really gets us anywhere. Is it really any more insightful than the old rules? Johnson takes us up a flight of stairs only to find the door at the top locked.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
|