Moral Minds and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Qty:1
  • List Price: $15.99
  • Save: $3.69 (23%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
Moral Minds: The Nature o... has been added to your Cart
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Book is used, fast shipping and great customer service.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Moral Minds: The Nature of Right and Wrong Paperback – September 4, 2007

ISBN-13: 978-0060780722 ISBN-10: 006078072X Edition: Reprint

Buy New
Price: $12.30
51 New from $0.50 98 Used from $0.01 1 Collectible from $9.98
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle
"Please retry"
Paperback
"Please retry"
$12.30
$0.50 $0.01
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Amazon Student Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student


Best Books of the Year
See the Best Books of 2014
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for 2014's Best Books of the Year in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.

Frequently Bought Together

Moral Minds: The Nature of Right and Wrong + The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion
Price for both: $22.10

Buy the selected items together
If you buy a new print edition of this book (or purchased one in the past), you can buy the Kindle edition for only $2.99 (Save 37%). Print edition purchase must be sold by Amazon. Learn more.


Best Books of the Year
Best Books of 2014
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for 2014's Best Books of the Year in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 528 pages
  • Publisher: Harper Perennial; Reprint edition (September 4, 2007)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 006078072X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0060780722
  • Product Dimensions: 5.3 x 1.2 x 8 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 2.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (11 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #591,233 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

“About one of the hottest new topics in intellectual life: the psychology and biology of morals. . . fascinating.” (Steven Pinker, Professor of Psychology, Harvard University, and author of The Language Instinct and How the Mind Works)

“An account of the nature of the human moral organ . . . a lucid, expert and challenging introduction.” (Noam Chomsky, Professor of Linguistics, MIT)

“An intellectual feast that provokes thought and should stimulate critical reflection . . . a major contribution to an ongoing debate.” (Peter Singer, Professor of Bioethics, Princeton University)

“The most complete attempt to bring together philosophy, anthropology, cognitive science and neuroscience... daring and wise.” (Antonio Damasio, Professor of Neuroscience, University of Southern California)

“The scientific exploration of morality has advanced at a breathtaking pace… [an] enjoyable book.” (Daniel Kahneman, Professor of Psychology and Public Affairs, Princeton University, and 2002 Nobel Laureate in Economics)

“For a wide audience...a superb overview of one of the hottest topics in the life sciences...a treat.” (Science)

“An audacious claim about moral thought...highly accessible to a general audience...a deeply significant intellectual contribution.” (Nature)

“Unlikely to disappoint.” (Nicholas Wade, New York Times)

“Pathbreaking... relevant to some of the most fundamental contemporary debates in philosophy and public life.” (New York Review of Books)

About the Author

Marc D. Hauser is the author of the highly acclaimed Wild Minds. He has been featured in the New York Times, USA Today, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, and the Boston Globe, as well as on Today,The Early Show, PBS's Scientific American Frontiers, and NPR. Hauser is Professor of Psychology, Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, and Biological Anthropology at Harvard University, where he is director of the Cognitive Evolution Laboratory and co-director of the Mind, Brain and Behavior Program. He is the recipient of a National Science Foundation Young Investigator Award, a Guggenheim Award, a College de France Science medal, and a Harvard College Professorship chair for his excellence in teaching.


More About the Author

Marc Hauser is a scientist, educator, innovator, and humanist. With broad training in the biological and social sciences, as well as philosophy and linguistics, he has published over 200 scientific papers and six books, including most recently Moral Minds (2006, NY: Harper Collins). During his 18 years as a professor at Harvard University, he worked on topics in animal cognition, moral psychology, cognitive development, cognitive neuroscience, behavioral economics, linguistics, anthropology, and philosophy. In the last three years, he has worked with high at-risk youths, bringing the tools of the mind and brain sciences to help change their lives, including their capacity to learn and make meaningful decisions. This work continues today. He is married to Lilan Hauser and has two daughters, Alexandra and Sofia.

Customer Reviews

This is a great book just know that there are very dry moments.
Anonymous
Because of this, it seems that he doesn't make any real case for anything because he meanders too much.
Kevin Currie-Knight
They are overlapping in part, but there are problems with the integration.
Harkius

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

42 of 47 people found the following review helpful By Kevin Currie-Knight TOP 1000 REVIEWERVINE VOICE on December 28, 2007
Format: Paperback
After about 300 pages, I decided to look at some amazon reviews for this book. I was wondering if others had as tough a time as I did following Hauser. I was curious to find out if others were as confused as I was about how this book could be called a work of science rather than an attempt of a scientist to delve into philosophy.

I am somewhat relieved that others came away with the same impression. Before I got this book, I was excited indeed to read it. I have read much both in moral philosophy and explorations of the intersection between it and biology (books by Shermer, Midgley, Ridley, Richard Posner, and works of evolutionary psychology.)

I don't want to risk exagerating, but this one is probably the worst of them. Hauser states his intent to show that morality is instinctual and innate in the sense that linguists have shown a "language instinct." That is, Hauser recognizes moral differences between cultures, but wants to show that morality has basic rules that are innately present, and that variation - like in language - is an acquired thing.

And on top of this, he wants to tie his findings to the conception of morality of John Rawls' "Veil of Ignorance" theory, rather than David Hume and Adam Smith's more emotive theory of morality. Where he does this exactly, I am not sure. I tried to decipher his argument, but the section of the book where he argues for a Rawlsian, rather than a Humean, conception of moral development seems actually to do the opposite. He succeeds only in showing that human moral judgments are first made on gut intuition and only after use reason either to justify or refine them. Humean indeed!

The other area where I was unclear was on how, exactly, Hauser showed that our moral sense is in any way objective across cultures.
Read more ›
6 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
14 of 17 people found the following review helpful By Harkius VINE VOICE on August 13, 2008
Format: Paperback
First, go read Kevin Currie's review, because it is fairly insightful. Much of what I would say is written there, and there is nothing there that I disagree with enough to contradict it, except that there is a great deal of science, you just have to filter it out of the remainder of the book. To be fair, much of it is after page 307, where he apparently stopped.

My generalized comment about this book is that reading it is like looking through a microscope with the eyepieces too far apart: There is some region in the center that is viewable through both eyes, but the remainder of the field of view is only accessible by part of what should be seeing it. The two fields are science and the humanities. They are overlapping in part, but there are problems with the integration. For example, as in all carefully worded scientific statements, the author is careful to word things as "evidence of this was not found in the study", which means that it is not disproven, it is merely inconclusive. The humanities references are largely inappropriate, making little or no sense in the context that they are in. They seem to scream, "I'm not just a scientist! I am a renaissance man, and my interests are diverse!" The problem is that they are irrelevant at best, distracting at worst, and never tied into the flow of ideas, except perhaps as a joke would be in Family Guy.

More particular comments, as I am wont to do with science books, are as follows:

First, his mention, on pg. 10, of the evolution of distanced altruism being formerly impossible, is quite clever. I haven't ever seen this suggestion before, even if it is not unique, and it is quite useful.

Second, on pg. 136, amongst other places, Dr. Hauser refers to the unchanging status of human moral and psychological systems.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By PST on February 27, 2010
Format: Paperback
The book tries to prove - or at least make plausible - that man has a moral grammar, similar to the hardwired language grammar postulated by Noman Chomsky.
While the book contains many, many fascinating accounts of highly interesting tests done by biologists and psychologists, I often missed the link between these results, and the claim the author wants to prove.
Of course, he succeeds in refuting many erroneous claims, such as the one that religion has anything to do with morality, but refuting one claim does not necessarily constitute a proof of another.

So, while reading the results of the many test is very interesting in itself, I feel the book falls short on proving the claim it makes.

This is a shame, as intuitively I am very sure, he is on the right track.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
12 of 18 people found the following review helpful By Jay Turley on June 7, 2008
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
In "Moral Minds", Marc Hauser makes a great case for the existence of an innate morality that exists within all humans, similar to Noam Chomsky's innate organ of language. Drawing on a vast field of research and history, the reader is led step by step to the understanding that morality is an evolved capability which exists not only in humans, but in various degrees in the other animals in the world. His expositions are clear, his thoughts lucid, and aside from a short and mostly pointless digression discussing Conway's Game of Life, the book is brilliant. Highly recommended to anyone, especially those who are tired of the old "atheists are amoral" arguments.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful By Anonymous on December 4, 2012
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I have a background in psychology and found his explanation of all of the classic studies to be pretty well informed. The philosophical insights in this book were also extremely interesting. There were definiley points when I though I was drowning in semantics. This was almost always quickly followed by a very concise explanation of the writers viewpoint. I picked this book up for a dollar used from the library and since then have purchased several to give out to others. This is a great book just know that there are very dry moments.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again