More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Contro... and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more

Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Color:
Image not available

To view this video download Flash Player

 


or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Start reading More Guns, Less Crime on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws, Third Edition (Studies in Law and Economics) [Paperback]

John R. Lott Jr.
4.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (218 customer reviews)

List Price: $18.00
Price: $11.25 & FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Details
You Save: $6.75 (38%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
Want it Monday, July 14? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Amazon Student

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition $10.49  
Paperback $11.25  

Book Description

May 24, 2010 0226493660 978-0226493664 Third Edition

John R. Lott, Jr., is the author five books, including Freedomnomics and Are Predatory Commitments Credible? Who Should the Courts Believe? , the latter also published by the University of Chicago Press.


Frequently Bought Together

More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws, Third Edition (Studies in Law and Economics) + The Bias Against Guns: Why Almost Everything You'Ve Heard About Gun Control Is Wrong + The Second Amendment
Price for all three: $43.58

Buy the selected items together


Editorial Reviews

Review

“A compelling book with enough hard evidence that even politicians may have to stop and pay attention. More Guns, Less Crime is an exhaustive analysis of the effect of gun possession on crime rates. . . . Mr. Lott’s book—and the factual arsenals of other pro-gun advocates—are helping to redefine the argument over guns and gun control.”

(James Bovard Wall Street Journal)

“John Lott’s More Guns, Less Crime revives the wisdom of the past by using the latest tools of social science. By constructing careful statistical models and deploying a wealth of crime data he shows that laws permitting the carrying of concealed weapons actually lead to a drop in crime in the jurisdictions that enact them. . . . By providing strong empirical evidence that yet another liberal policy is a cause of the very evil it purports to cure, he has permanently changed the terms of debate on gun control. . . . Lott’s book could hardly be more timely. . . . Lott’s work is a model of the meticulous application of economics and statistics to law and policy.”

(John O. McGinnis National Review)

About the Author

John R. Lott, Jr., is the author five books, including Freedomnomics and Are Predatory Commitments Credible? Who Should the Courts Believe? , the latter also published by the University of Chicago Press.


Product Details

  • Series: Studies in Law and Economics
  • Paperback: 472 pages
  • Publisher: University Of Chicago Press; Third Edition edition (May 24, 2010)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0226493660
  • ISBN-13: 978-0226493664
  • Product Dimensions: 8.9 x 6.6 x 1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.1 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (218 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #25,548 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews
284 of 290 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
First, some background about me: I am a Ph.D.-holder and tenured professor whose immersion in the insular politics of academia had led me to harbor many negative perceptions about firearms. Though I was never staunchly "anti-gun," I was not a gun owner, did not understand the appeal of firearms, and generally believed that gun control legislation was only common sense. That changed four years ago when I (finally) decided to look into the data on guns, crime, and public safety for myself. I am a trained researcher, but I conducted my research for personal not professional reasons. My wife was pregnant and I wanted hard facts--not talking point from the political parties--so I could make an informed decision about what to teach my children about firearms, and whether it would be prudent or dangerous to have one in our house.

I was drawn into that research almost immediately by the sheer force of my own disbelief. I discovered fact after fact that starkly disproved the claims and "facts" so many teachers and colleagues had expressed about firearms and their relationship to violence, and which, during my long trip through academia, had led me to believe stricter gun control was just plain common sense. For two years, I read thousands of pages of information, starting with raw data from the FBI and CDC so that I would be better able to assess the claims I subsequently read in books, peer-reviewed journals, news publications, blogs, and so forth. In the course of that research, I came across numerous references to John Lott's studies, but so many of them suggested there were "fatal flaws" in his methodology (and questions about his motives) that I never bothered to read him. I simply assumed based on the sheer number of such comments that his work was indeed more propaganda than serious study.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
96 of 96 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
I am not a researcher (though I am a board-certified forensic expert), but I have used the modeling/analysis tools that John Lott has employed in his research.

What I find in reading this book is a scholarly, measured examination of the statistics of the relationship between gun ownership and non-discriminatory ("shall issue") concealed carry permit laws.

Even more than that, I find his manner of expression to be most reassuring. He is not making a point or promoting a political position. He is simply OBSERVING what is.

This reminds me of a situation some years ago working on a project for a State of California government department. I am, by the way, a former Federal, State and Local civil servant. An issue came up regarding what State agency - if any - had jurisdiction over the construction work of the project. In particular, what agency was responsible for reviewing construction plans and issuing a construction permit. Stay with me here....................., and you'll see where this is going.

So, being the project engineer (you knew that, right?) I approached the State agency that the Department building the project stated had jurisdiction. When I reported what that agency stated - in writing - that they did not have jurisdiction, the Department employee stated that I was stating my "opinion" about the matter. This is willfully confounding opion with observation. I was simply reporting what I had observed, and provided the source documentation. Yet, the civil servant I was dealing with insisted on declaring this observation an "opinion" since he did not like the factual information that was presented to them.

John Lott faces a similar situation - in that folks who disagree with his OBSERVATIONS want to declare them OPINIONS.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
105 of 118 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
More Guns, Less Crime 2010 is the third edition of Lott's book originally based on his and David Mustard's Right-To-Carry study of 1997 that measured the result of 22 states going "shall issue" on carry permits for handguns between 1986 and 1996. The first 1998 edition was focussed on the RTC issue.

The 2nd edition 2000 looked at other gun control policies as well, and commented on the controversy that Lott & Mustard 1997 and Lott 1998 engendered in the media and among academics.

Since the 2nd edition 2000, a lot has happened: the CDC 2003 and NAS 2004 reviews on gun laws and gun violence, the sunset of the 1994-2004 federal Assault Weapon Ban, the Supreme Court decision on the Heller case in 2008 (gun ban in DC v Second Amendment), and so on. The 3rd edition 2010 is expanded by about 150 pages to cover these new issues.

I would like to correct an impression that may be created by an earlier reviewer, that Lott's book is a major Second Amendment resource. First, in the 2nd edition there were one sentence and one paragraph in the text and three paragraphs in the footnotes on the Second Amendment out of 300+ pages (Second Admendment issues were "...important issues that are beyond the scope of this book"--Lott at page 168); while the 3rd edition expands somewhat on the Second Amendment, it is not a resource book on the Second Amendment. Secondly, Lott stated in the Oct 2008 NPR debate on guns that his family did not own a gun until his 1996 research convinced him that having a gun was beneficial for self defense within reasonable safety costs. Lott's argument on guns and gun control is based on weighing the economic benefits v the costs of gun ownership and gun control: this is a law and economics argument, not a constitutional law argument.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Simple logic... but hard for 'some' to grasp.
Published 1 day ago by John W Benedict
5.0 out of 5 stars Disturbing but thought provoking
Having just finished reading The Black Swan, I am extraordinarily sensitive that theories be 'falsifiable' - that is, you should be able to disprove them with data. Read more
Published 3 days ago by ALLEN SUPYNUK
4.0 out of 5 stars Four Stars
good read on factual data!
Published 6 days ago by Wesley A. Ornick
5.0 out of 5 stars GUNS DON'T KILL PEOPLE UNTIL PEOPLE PULL THE TRIGGER! CAN YOU PROTECT...
I AM UNDER THE MOST ASTUTE IMPRESSION THAT PEOPLE ARE MUCH MORE EMOTIONALLY ATTACHED TO THEIR LOVE OF LIBERTY THAN THEIR INTELLECTUAL AND MORAL RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT IT FROM... Read more
Published 9 days ago by Michael Driskill
2.0 out of 5 stars it was the day they BECAME a true coward
Oscar Pretorious has a good excuse that he needs a gun in order to be brave. like all of the NRA-types in America need guns before they can be brave too. But Oscar has no feet. Read more
Published 10 days ago by Douglas B. Barr
5.0 out of 5 stars For those who support gun rights
If you support the 2nd Amendment but have a hard time articulating your case for why personal protection is important but need a single reference point that looks at the solid... Read more
Published 18 days ago by Mike Pollard
2.0 out of 5 stars Likely the wrong title for this book
I first admit that I am only 3/4 the way through this book and would love to give details for every chapter, but I think one could best summarize this thesis in a just a few short... Read more
Published 22 days ago by John Readit
5.0 out of 5 stars Concealed Carry Laws reduce violent crime.
The major bullet points from this book need to be organized by the NRA and NAGR and summarized for all pro-2nd Amendment citizens to have a unified front to combat the media and... Read more
Published 26 days ago by Paul G.
5.0 out of 5 stars Liars may figure, but figures don't lie.
Very good analysis of the data from the Justice Department and other sources. The liars will keep trying to figure out a way to undermine Lott's efforts, but so far their methods... Read more
Published 1 month ago by Glassco
5.0 out of 5 stars The Facts on Gun Ownership
More Guns, Less Crime, John R. Lott, Jr.

This book explores the relationship between crime and gun control laws. Read more
Published 1 month ago by Acute Observer
Search Customer Reviews
Search these reviews only


Forums

There are no discussions about this product yet.
Be the first to discuss this product with the community.
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 



Look for Similar Items by Category