Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your email address or mobile phone number.
Holding doesn't like Mormons, but at least he could strive be accurate in his interpretations of what Mormons believe and do. Grrrr!Published 12 months ago by Ronnie Bennett-Bray
J.P. Holding has many good intentions, but his efforts in apologetics are marred by his use of mockery and insult. As a brother in the Lord I cannot support Holding's ministry. Read morePublished on February 18, 2012 by Mandude
James Patrick Holding is "President of Tekton Apologetics Ministries ... and has written articles for the 'Creatio Ex Nihilo Technical Journal' and the 'Christian Research... Read morePublished on June 8, 2011 by Steven H Propp
Review of James Patrick Holding. The Mormon Defenders: How Latter-day Saint Apologists Misinterpret the Bible. Self-published, 2001. 160 pp. $8.99. Read morePublished on February 7, 2009 by Crazy Horse
Having encountered Mormon apologists and been bemused by their clear misuse of scripture I found this book to be a useful tool in providing answers for their... Read morePublished on January 14, 2008 by Jason Clark
This book by James Patrick Holding is a cut above the anti-Mormon fare, and Holding deserves kudos for writing in a very respectful style, and, furthermore, not engaging in the... Read morePublished on November 22, 2006 by Bobby Boylan
The biik came is incredibly fast manner, was reasonably priced, and in new condition. Thank you very much for your professionalism.Published on July 17, 2006 by Thomas E. Elliott
I like the tone of the book, as it is not as condescending as many other anti-Mormon books that I have read. That is why I gave it 3 stars. Read morePublished on April 14, 2005 by Sam Man
Holding's book does an excellent job of delineating differences between Mormon teachings and standard biblical interpretations. That's why I rated it 4 stars rather than 2 or 3. Read morePublished on January 3, 2003 by Kent Ponder