7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A detailed and chilling account of a war so often overlooked, November 10, 1998
By A Customer
This review is from: In Mortal Combat (Paperback)
Toland depicts the Korean War with such detail and accuracy that it becomes impossible to romantisize war. The soldiers were against overwhelming odds in extreme conditions, and constantly in a struggle to stay alive. By retelling the war from the perspective of all the key generals in the war, or from a close observer of a general, Toland gave us their insight to why they made the decisions that they did. He also captured many of these key decisions in the epilogue detailing the weaknesses and mistakes of the key leaders. His historical accuracy of the carnage produced on both sides made it a chilling reminder of the horrors of war. The lengthy cat and mouse game played between the governments of the United States, North Korea, and China to sign the peace agreement lasted over a year while American soldiers suffered in POW camps. I wasn't born at the time, but reading it now made me angry as the battles continued to produce casualties as did the POW camps. Very good book!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
11 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Poorly Researched, August 16, 2000
By A Customer
This review is from: In Mortal Combat (Paperback)
Toland has written some outstanding books to include, THE RISING SUN and BUT NOT IN SHAME. However, IN MORTAL COMBAT is sloppy. He routinely makes mistakes when describing Anerican Army combat units and their role in the war. Moreover, he has lionized ceratin commanders, like Gen Walker, who were at best mediocre commanders. The book's only strength is that he made an attempt to tell the story of the North Koreans, too, and for that Toland deserves some credit. Still, for a better history of the war, its hard to beat Roy Appleman's SOUTH TO THE NAKTONG, NORTH TO THE YALU.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good Book and somewhat like the real War ..., December 8, 1998
This review is from: In Mortal Combat (Paperback)
due to the fact that it has a strong and interesting beginning, a somewhat "vanilla" middle , and a rather "limp" ending.
I am not a military historian, but am an analyst. I am not a veteran, but do understand the difference between the various types of "histories",i.e. academic military history, journalistic military history, popular military history ("coffee table" books, etc.), "official histories", oral history, etc.
This book definately falls into the journalistic history category, with all it pitfalls and advantages. One pitfall is that Mr. Toland is FAR too easy on the press in general and he doesn't spend much time at all on faults of the forementioned press. On the other hand, one of the advantages is that this book is a wonderful "read", i.e. the book has a definite flow to it (along with being easy to read).
In my opinion, the book, like some of his other books, starts off very strong and detailed and then proceeds to a somewhat bland middle and finishes with a rather "limp" ending. [The book of his that epitimizes this is: The Rising Sun!] His discussion of Generals Walker and MacArthur are very good indeed and better than most other books (considering that he does it better in FAR less space/wording). Another strong suit of this book is the insight and discussion of POWS and their treatment. He also, does give a view of the "other side of the hill", which other so-called "histories of the Korean War" fail to do. However, in the middle of the book I would have liked to see more detailed discussion on some of the "nitty-gritty" tactical battles once the Chinese entered the war (as by this pt. in the book he just covers entire campaigns at the division and Corps level, with just "snippets" of tactical action). Finally, the last group of chapters in the book, "WAR & PEACE", could have been much better. He only covers the political bickering between the two sides and almost completely ignores ANY of the many interesting tactical struggles going on all along the "static" front line (MLR). IF he would have covered more than just the one he did, it would have GREATLY enhanced the book for me.
Thus, my real rating for this book is as follows:
1st 1/3 of book ***** (5 stars) Middle 1/3 of book ***1/2 (3.5 stars) Final 1/3 of book ** (2 stars)
Overall rating = 5 + 3.5 + 2 = 10.5/3 = 3.5 Stars or rounding to 4 Stars.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No