5.0 out of 5 stars
A thicket of scholarship, January 3, 2012
This review is from: Moses Mendelssohn;: A biographical study (Hardcover)
This is a truly magisterial and immensely detailed work, first published in 1973: a text of 759 pages, and definitely not a book for readers not already familiar with an outline of Mendelssohn's life or with the philosophical issues of the time. They will find it difficult to see the wood for the trees, and even those who can see the wood may possibly find the number of trees in it frequently on the excessive side.
The special quality of the book is that the late Professor Altmann analyzes in detail all the major essays and books that Mendelssohn had written, as well as innumerable exchanges of correspondence (which are excellently translated into modern and very readable English).
Altmann devotes 18 pages on the famous Prize Essay contest of 1763 (on whether philosophical truths are capable of the same clarity as mathematical truths), setting out and commenting on not only the arguments with which Mendelssohn (on the third ballot) won the prize but also those of Kant who was placed second; and there are 53 pages about the content of and the correspondence about the Phaidon, Mendelssohn's dialogue about the immortality of the soul, plus another 15 about the efforts to convey its ideas in Hebrew.
Whilst these two examples make for tough reading, the 68 page long chapter about the Lavater Affair of 1770 and its little-known repercussions are (mostly) easier to follow. Lavater had challenged Mendelssohn either to refute or to accept Christianity. In reply Mendelssohn affirmed his Judaism (without at this time writing a defence of the Jewish religion), but for several reasons, the most important of these probably the prudential ones, declined Lavater's challenge. But this bare sentence does not do justice to a complex story, which both enters into the details of Mendelssohn's reply and at the same time throws a vivid light on his personality and also on how the position of even as distinguished a Jew as himself was still precarious.
52 pages are devoted to Mendelssohn's translation of the Pentateuch into German and to the commentary (Be'ur) that accompanied it. Amid the immense details of the account and the praise he heaps on the labour devoted to it, Altmann makes no comment on the significance of the Be'ur. I could find nothing in the book to support what I had read elsewhere, that the commentary taught that the essence of the Bible is ethical rather than ritual or scholastic. Perhaps the sources I had read were wrong, for if they were right, surely Altmann would have commented on it. As it is, it appears that the objections which some rabbis had to the book was not so much to the commentary as to the fact that the translation was printed side by side with the sacred text, and to the fear that readers would devote more time to the translation than to the original.
There are 63 pages about the background, content and debate about Mendelssohn's Jerusalem, which dispel the story, still found in many books about him that it was written in response to a second challenge for Mendelssohn to convert to Christianity, this time from Joseph II's minister Joseph von Sonnenfels. Mendelssohn himself originally thought that the challenge had come from Sonnenfels, but discovered, when the book was already at the press, that in fact it had been written by a much less important Berlin figure, one August Friedrich Cranz, who had signed the challenge as S*** from Vienna.
The most indigestible pages - in my opinion a quite disproportionate 112 of them - are towards the end, and deal with the dispute, during the last three years of Mendelssohn's life, between him and Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi. Jacobi had written to him about a meeting he had had with Mendelssohn's closest friend Gotthold Ephraim Lessing a year before the latter's death in 1781, and that in that meeting Lessing had avowed himself a Spinozist. Mendelssohn was excessively upset to learn that Lessing, with whom he had always had a frank change of ideas (usually agreeing, occasionally disagreeing) should have kept his Spinozism from him, though in retrospect he was not all that surprised. He was now concerned to show, from his own knowledge of Lessing, that, if his avowal was serious - which could not be taken for granted - his Spinozism would not have been the atheism that Jacobi, along with many people at the time, attributed to Spinoza, but was a "purified Spinozism", namely pantheism. He felt driven to explain this and also to define his own position on Spinozism - part respectful but ultimately rejecting - in some chapters of his book, Morgenstunden. The way he and Jacobi handled their contest became increasingly hostile and even to an extent devious; Mendelssohn became increasingly worked up about it, and this was believed by some to have contributed to his death in 1786: on a cold December day he had hurried out without an overcoat to deliver to his publisher a manuscript against Jacobi, caught a chill, and died four days later.
It is striking that the book ends without Altmann attempting a general summary and assessment, not only of Mendelssohn's life but of the enormous effect his life had on the later history of Judaism in Germany and subsequently on Judaism in general.
The book is a mine of information, but I cannot say that I have enjoyed reading it: it is far too dense. However, it would be churlish to give a work of such scholarship fewer than the five stars which, rather reluctantly, I do.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No