Most Helpful Customer Reviews
31 of 32 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Four and a half stars..., October 14, 2006
This review is from: The Most Famous Man in America: The Biography of Henry Ward Beecher (Hardcover)
I would not have chosen to read a book about Henry Ward Beecher, but I received The Most Popular Man in America: The Biography of Henry Ward Beecher by Debby Applegate as a gift. I was pleasantly surprised by this engrossing and well-written story. I knew just a little about Beecher, most of it coming from Ron Power's book, Mark Twain. I wasn't aware that Beecher's father was the famous Congregationalist preacher, Lyman Beecher. Henry was born and raised in an austere, Calvinist household. They did not celebrate Christmas, holidays or birthdays. Yet, Henry did not grow up in a joyless or loveless home. Lyman adored his twelve children and spent lots of time with them, insisting that "they were endowed with great gifts of intelligence, compassion and self-discipline." Education was a priority (even for the girls) and spirited discussion was expected and encouraged. Henry did not set out to enter the ministry, but after graduating from Amherst, he found himself enrolled in his father's seminary. Once he entered the ministry, he wasn't always the best parson, but he was a brilliant preacher. This was a time period when entertaining speakers were comparable to the rock stars of today. He eventually found a home at Plymouth Church in Brooklyn Heights. While there, he became embroiled in the abolitionist movement. In fact, Beecher is credited with bringing anti-slavery to the mainstream. Beecher was largely responsible for changing the core beliefs about Christianity in the 19th Century. He switched the focus from a vengeful and wrathful God to a loving and forgiving one. He was not without his critics, and some accused him of turning people into Beecherites rather than Christians. All great men have their weaknesses, and Beecher's was his ego. He liked to live very lavishly (after a very frugal start) and was constantly overextended. His wife, Eunice, was a difficult woman and Beecher's treatment of her wasn't always exemplary. But the biggest scandal to befall Beecher involved his many alleged extramarital affairs. His best friend, Theodore Tilton, eventually sued him over an alleged affair between Beecher and Tilton's wife, Elizabeth. These infidelities would blacken his name, split his parish and torture his soul. Applegate does a magnificent job of bringing Beecher to life. The only shortcoming I can see in The Most Famous Man is that there is virtually nothing about Beecher's children. If not for this, I would have given this book a resounding 5 star vote.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
25 of 28 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A biography of great depth, November 22, 2006
This review is from: The Most Famous Man in America: The Biography of Henry Ward Beecher (Hardcover)
"The Most Famous Man in America: the biography of Henry Ward Beecher" by DEBBY APPLEGATE *******GENERAL******* Without question, DEBBY APPLEGATE has tremendous depth as a biographer, but Applegate also has potential as an eminent historian. When I read her chapters, I was surprised at the depth of historical knowledge presented. The research is illuminative of all phases of the life of Henry Ward Beecher. Applegate connects Beecher to the people surrounding him, and to the American nation as a whole; but this book's real penetration is its coverage of American society leading up to the Civil War. In fact, her treatment of each member of the Beecher Family is rich, impressing upon us the importance of the Beecher family in the greater context of the fabric of the American nation. There are no indications in the cover or Introduction that inform us that Applegate has has this depth as an historian, in addition to being a good biographer. The characterization of the proverbial "Connecticut Yankee" takes on flesh in this thorough biography, because Applegate can write concerning the fullness of the human personality which transcends the superficial aspects of human character. Not every biographer can accomplish this, but we often wouldn't know it. One is seldom aware if a biographer fails to show you something. There is nothing pedestrian about Applegate's writing. This is a writer with a gift for making a human being almost transparent. *****SPECIFICS******** Applegate's biography comes at a time when popular authors mislead and confuse people with misinformation and extensive historical ommissions as to the character and nature of American religious figures of significance and the times in which they made significant contribution to the life of the American nation. Applgegate has the ability to show poignant contrasts in the Beecher family, but more importantly, Applegate elaborates the background of turmoil as the controversy of slaveholding begins to embroil the young nation, For example, the author makes clear the social situation at Amherst college and other American colleges, where idealistic young men and women who were pushed toward religious revival by the faculty, surprised society by including the liberation of black slaves as part of a step away from sin and toward salvation. This was an unpredictable outcome of ever-present evangelism efforts in American communities. Applegate accurately identifies this fervor as comparable to the campus activism of the 1960's. Furthermore, Applegate is not describing events as though they were occurrances separate from the actions of individuals, which is how textbooks often show events, as though they were disembodied from actual persons. Rather, Applegate is showing that historical and social trends are distinctly the product of specific individuals, and also that these events are the outcome of the conflict of specific ideas that are embodied in the people. An example of this is the religious strife in the Boston area brought about by the differences between the Protestants (notably Lyman Beecher) and the Catholics. The other hotbed was in Cincinnati, OHIO where Lyman Beecher ran LANE SEMINARY, an institution whose Abolitionist activism reached boiling point, prompting mob violence and threatening the rule of law. Applegate, in my opinion, deserves a high stature as an American biographer, and her subject is essential to a clear understanding of American history. She begins with the father, Lyman Beecher, and demonstrates the imprint he made upon his children. Sometimes that imprint was a torment, even if well intentioned. What is fascinating about Applegate's handling of Lyman Beecher is her writing never strays from a balanced and impartial neutrality. She never presents anyone as though she were, in some petty and judgemental fashion, holding the person up for us to ridicule. Applegate takes the person at face value. Perhaps Applegate comes from a family where it is commonly accepted that every person has an innate worth. I did not come from that kind of a background, but if Applegate can introduce every personality she studies, in this manner, I'm eager to read all she writes. --Bruce R. Bain /
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
14 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Great Writng, Good History, Disturbing Conclusion, January 7, 2008
I am an author, a Christian, and a Calvinist. I love good history. However, after the deep prejudice against, and misunderstanding of Calvinism portrayed in the first two chapters, I almost put the book down. Despite these reservations, I am glad I persevered. Applegate writes in an engaging, entertaining style. I finished with fresh incite into the political machinations of early 19th century America, especialy New York, New England, and the history of the early abolitionist movement. I also concluded down deeply disturbed and distressed by the subject of the book, Henry Ward Beecher. Applegate repeatedly stresses two attributes of Beecher's moral character. The first was his lust for fame and popularity. The second is his continual compromise of conscience to obtain that popularity. These compromises ruined his life and the lives of many associated with him. She closes by comparing him to Dr. Martin Luther King, John F. Kennedy, and Bill Clinton, all good comparisons, and in my opinion, all deeply distressing hypocrites like Beecher. I finished the book with mixed feelings of revulsion and empathy for Beecher. He was a first class hypocrite. He continually preached love, but abused and used his wife, his congregation, his business associates and the women with whom he comitted adultery. He pretended to be one thing, but in reality was the exact opposite. Was he weak? Yes, like all of us he was weak. But was he sincere? It doesn't appear that he was. A sincere man seeks help. He wants to change. He humbles himself and exposes his weakness. Beecher did none of these Instead, continually and habitually covered up the damning evidence that pointed to his sins. That is not the definition of a good person. Did he do some good? Yes. He was a key figure in the abolitionist movement. But, in other respects he was much like the men exposed in Paul Johnson's insightful book, "Intellectuals." He was a man who loved the world in general, but was incapable of loving those closest to himself. Despite these facts, the author was unwilling to call Beecher what he really was, "a wolf in sheeps clothing." She concludes, "His painful awareness of his own weakness and his ongoing battle to overcome them were the wellspring of his great and lasting contribution to American life: the all forgiving Gospel of Love. As Beecher would have said, without sin there can be no saving grace." It appears that Applegate, like Beecher, is in love with love, but not real virtue. True loves serves, expends itself, humbles itself, and dies that other might live. But Applegate's conclusion spins evil, refusing to come to grips with it or condemn it. Yes God is love, but He is also justice. The two cannot be separated. This is not the definition of a good man. I expected Applegate to draw this clear conclusion. I was disappointed. In short, Applegate writes well. I am thankful for her research, and the volumes of excellent information on Beecher and his times. I am deeply disturbed by her conclusions. They express the same loss of moral compass as the man she writes about, Henry Ward Beecher
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|