This is a book that is certainly worth reading, because it's one of the few available on a topic that is relevant to readers in North American and European readers as it is to those in the author's home country of Jordan. As pressures grow among Muslim immigrant communities in Europe (and to a much lesser degree, in North America) for local laws to include 'sharia' (Islam's legal code, based on the Koran and Muslim teachings), issues such as honor killings emerge as hot points. As Husseini points out, male members of a woman's family believe and argue that they have the right under these traditions to avenge a family's honor should the woman violate (or be believed to have violated) their interpretation of religious rules and local mores. Just as this book was being distributed to bookstores across North America, the family of one young woman attacked and drove over her and a female companion, killing them both, in the name of their family honor.
What Rana Husseini attempts to do in this book -- to draw attention to these murders -- is laudable and valuable. The subtitle says it all: "when a life is worth less than honor." Indeed, so important is the issue that I would have loved to have been able to give this book a five-star rating and urge it on everyone I know who would be even remotely interested in the topic. But I can't do that.
The problem lies in the way Husseini approaches the book. This isn't about honor killings; it's about Rana Husseini and her heroic, courageous crusade against them. Now, call me a curmudgeon, but I'd rather decide for myself whether someone's actions are courageous and heroic than have this asserted -- repeatedly -- by the author about herself. She's leading a movement to fight honor killings, which has certainly landed her in some hot water at home in Jordan (although she certainly has a number of very significant allies in the shape of members of the Jordanian royal family.) But comparing the tone of this book to that of Somaly Mam in her memoir of sexual slavery
The Road of Lost Innocence: The True Story of a Cambodian Heroine is jarring. Mam -- who was herself a victim and has moved on to campaign for basic human rights for women in a different but equally important area -- never comes across as self-congratulatory. In contrast, by the time I was 25 pages into this book, I was already weary of Husseini patting herself on the back.
The structure of the book doesn't help. It jumps from one anecdote to another, with bits of Husseini's campaign scattered in between. It isn't until nearly 100 pages into the book that a rudimentary background to the issue of honor killings emerges, and even so, it remained unclear to me the extent to which this was religious or cultural in origin, and how it had been practiced over time and how it was rationalized (specifically) by reference to the Koran. It's like reading a book about the Holocaust in which the personal stories of the victims -- horrific and chilling -- are recounted over and over again, without any of the context that led to their persecution, any political history of prewar Germany or recounting of Nazi ideology. There were also many questions that remained unanswered by the end of the book -- are honor killings, for instance, on the rise as contact between the Western world and Jordan has increased? Is familiarity with the more freewheeling mores of the West making Middle Eastern men angrier, more defensive or more anxious that their own women need to be stopped from behaving as they were in an episode of Gossip Girl?
A better editor would have helped make this book a standout, reshaping its choppy, anecdotal style into something more effectively polemical. Husseini could also have done more for her cause by allowing the facts to speak for themselves, particularly early in the book when the reader is still forming their first impressions.
As it stands, this is a two-star book about a subject that -- while it may only affect a tiny minority of women -- is vitally important, since it speaks to the whole idea of how societies define, perceive and protect the rights of an individual. I've rated it 3.5 stars, for that reason, and would recommend it cautiously to those who are able to ignore the flaws and focus on the (somewhat repetitive) core argument and supporting evidence.