Prime Music
Qty:1

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Image Unavailable

Image not available for
Color:
  • Mussorgsky: Khovanshchina
  • Sorry, this item is not available in
  • Image not available
  • To view this video download Flash Player
      

Mussorgsky: Khovanshchina


List Price: $39.99
Price: $33.99 & FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Details
You Save: $6.00 (15%)
Only 4 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
7 new from $26.67 2 used from $26.67
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
2-Disc Version
$33.99
$26.67 $26.67


Product Details

  • Actors: M. Mussorgsky, Vladimir Ognovenko, Vladimir Galouzine, Gran Teatre del Liceu
  • Format: Multiple Formats, Classical, Color, NTSC
  • Language: Russian (DTS 5.1), Russian (PCM Stereo)
  • Subtitles: English, French, German, Spanish, Italian
  • Region: All Regions
  • Aspect Ratio: 1.78:1
  • Number of discs: 2
  • Rated: NR (Not Rated)
  • Studio: Opus Arte
  • DVD Release Date: March 25, 2008
  • Run Time: 192 minutes
  • Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
  • ASIN: B0012KOCNS
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #405,246 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)

Special Features

None.

Editorial Reviews

Product Description

Mussorgsky's loveless and brutal drama of the transformation of Russian society, which led to the rule of Peter the Great within the epic history of Russia, is powerfully modernised through Stein Winge's dramatic and uncompromising production. Performing

Review

Svarog protect us from operatic stage directors with concepts! Especially if these involve relocating the time or place of the work in hand. It seldom succeeds. It doesn't do so in stage director Stein Winge's Khovanshchina , moved to the Soviet Union in the 1950s. To be sure, we get Stalinist architecture--always good for a Kafkaesque twinge--and Prince Ivan Khovansky riding down on a girder to greet the assembled masses. As against this, we have many references in the opera to contemporary boyars, princes, scribes for the illiterate peasants, Czarina Catherine, Czars Peter and Ivan, schismatic sects in the powerful Russian Orthodox Church, and muskets (referred to while waving about and shooting off Kalashnikov rifles). In other words, there is a complete disconnect between Mussorgsky and Winge's vision. Guess who wins out.

This isn't to say that the production is otherwise without merit. The idea of an informer in Prince Ivan's inner circle is both clever and managed strikingly. There are several moments of effective theater, most notably in act IV, when Shaklovity and Dosifei engage in a staring contest, while the former slowly, contemptuously puts on his hat before the priest. Mass blocking, too, is handled well, though there is the usual tradeoff between complex movements and detailed acting from the chorus.

The performances unfortunately don't redeem the rest. Ognovenko starts poorly, but ultimately turns in a competent performance in the latter part of the work. Galouzine appears to be having an off day; and while his vocal focus improves after a disappointing first showing in act I, his voice seems unusually small throughout. Putilin is in excellent form as an especially brutal Shaklovity, while Clark is a superficial but accurate Scribe. Brubaker as Golitsyn actually sounds brighter, stronger than Galouzine. Zaremba's pronounced beat interferes with a decent, if not outstanding, interpretation. Vaneev is an especial disappointment. His ordinary, baritonal, sometimes-difficult-to-hear bass has its compensations in the way he lovingly handles cantabile, but Dosifei was meant for a voice of sonority, depth, and power--qualities that were intended as the vocal equivalent of the old religious leader's moral strength. Boder tends to rush, as both Marfa's fortunetelling session and Golitsyn's exile display. He uses the Shostakovich edition with the Voronkov conclusion, but cuts both the Lutheran pastor's scene and the dramatic one featuring Susanna.

Subtitles are in English, French, German, Spanish, Italian, and Catalan. The video format is 16:9 anamorphic, with audio available in LPCM stereo and Digital DTS surround. The only extra feature is an interview with Broder, who speaks a good game. He writes one, too, in the notes that accompany this DVD. But the only justification for the changes to an opera's setting can be found on the stage, where it either makes sense or doesn't, not in essays.

All in all, I can't recommend this. The production would look better if it were attached to another opera, perhaps one written by Stein Winge; and the performances have the lack of concentration you'd expect from an ensemble playing below full strength. Take a pass. -- Fanfare, Barry Brenesal, January 2010

Twin Spirits is a live theatrical performance that features narration, impersonation (in an epistolary manner), and chamber music centered on the lives and love of Robert and Clara Schumann. Evidently the work, created and directed by John Caird, toured in smaller venues before being presented at the Royal Opera House. It is indeed a unique experience, the letters of the Schumann's used as the basis for a story of their lives, dramatized here to excellent effect, and enhanced by their music.

One can think of no more worthy subjects than these two hyper-romantic figures, celebrated in their day and long afterwards, with personal connections tying them into the fortunes and foibles of Brahms, Liszt, Mendelssohn, Joachim, and Chopin. Their love story is one that was well known even in their own day, and their passion for one another is marked only by the equal degree of tragedy and sorrow that graced their short time together.

I will not dwell on aspects of that story here, as it is well known, and if unknown easily found in books and on the Web. Suffice it to say, the story begins with Robert's first studies with Clara Wieck's father (Robert was essentially self-taught), his aspirations as a pianist until he ruined his hands, his solicitation of love from Clara and desire to marry her (against her father's wishes), the frustration they experienced until they could get married, early bliss in their marital life and the success of each, Robert's seminal decline and mental instability, Clara's heartrending final years with Robert in an asylum, and her life after Robert's death. All of this seems like it might be too much for a stage production, but the letters have been carefully vetted in order to keep the action--such as it is--moving along. The story is given general guidelines by Derek Jacobi--superb as usual--and the parts of Robert and Clara taken by Sting and wife Trudie Styler. This might seem an odd choice at first, but Sting seems to have had a late-in-life classical-music conversion (remember his Dowland record?), and his performance as Robert is outstanding, as seasoned as from any actor I can imagine playing the part. Trudie Styler is equally affecting, and her moment of breakdown towards the end is truly distressing.

But this is not a play at all--there is no dramatic movement or stage acting. Most of the time, Sting and Trudie are seated close to one another, and they often lean towards each other when speaking. Jacobi is seated pretty much center stage, and they all can be seen watching each other. Interspersed among the talkers are a series of musicians, an all-male group (baritone, violin, piano) on Robert's side, and a female group (soprano, cello, piano) on Clara's side. At different times in the "action," the music of one of the Schumanns is played by one of these groups, or a portion of each. For the most part, the performances are excellent, the singing of Simon Keenlyside being notable, along with the last selection, the Finale from the D-Minor Piano Trio, op. 63, a real barnburner and triumphant ending to an otherwise factual human misfortune that nonetheless had moments of supreme joy. But its protagonists were certainly as star-crossed as Romeo and Juliet ever were.

If there is a downside, it would be the lack of more representative music on Robert's part. The very nature and intimacy of this production nixes the idea of large ensemble performances, but one feels like part of the emotional picture is missing without them. Some of the music has been doctored or altered, nothing egregious, but odd sounding to those who know it. This was probably unavoidable in order to make the music portion fuller while using only chamber pieces. The songs are what they are, and there are a few pieces pertinent to the Schumanns at certain times that are by other composers.

The staging is wonderful, making it easy to follow what is happening; the sound is equally pleasing, LPCM stereo or DTS surround (my choice). The music however, is only secondary to the engrossing tale, and is chosen wisely to enhance the story where the words end. As bonuses, we get a substantial amount, the cast talks and the documentary being of more than casual interest. I enjoyed this thoroughly, and I can't imagine any music lover who wouldn't. -- Fanfare, Steven E. Ritter, Jan-Feb 2010

Customer Reviews

3.8 out of 5 stars
5 star
0
4 star
3
3 star
1
2 star
0
1 star
0
See all 4 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

6 of 7 people found the following review helpful By A. McIntyre on September 15, 2008
The Barcelona production is a gem, despite changing the time period from Peter the Great to Russia in the 1950s. The change is especially confusing because Peter the Great is still the tsar during the post-Stalinist period in Russian history in this production. The plot has always been the problem with "Khovanshchina," so I suggest concentrating on the staging and music, especially the choral music.

The music is enough on its own to buy the DVD. The staging is wonderful, especially as the climax approaches in the final two acts (acts four and five). "Khovanshchina" will never attain the poularity of "Boris," nor should it. But, no not pass this DVD by if you like Mussorsky.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
10 of 13 people found the following review helpful By Mr. Daniel Zehnacker on May 3, 2008
Verified Purchase
La Khovanchtchina est une oeuvre complexe qui met en avant des problèmes aussi bien politiques, sentimentaux que religieux. Le peuple y exprime ses doutes, ses pulsions, et son envie d'un dirigeant qui soit l'incarnation de ses attentes, d'où une suite d'espérances et de déceptions qui peuvent aller jusqu'au suicide collectif en dehors des tensions personnelles.
Il existe plusieurs versions de cet opéra. Celle-ci, choisie par Stein Winge, rejette la pompe et les beaux costumes. Elle refuse la splendeur des mises en scène du KIrov, et se veut plus moderne, pour nous faire sentir que, dans chaque pays, les luttes pour le pouvoir sont éternelles, et que certains nouveaux Messies arrivent encore à mystifier la population par des espoirs fallacieux dans une vie de l'au-delà plus jouissive que l'existence terrienne.
Dans un décor unique, les solistes, tous excellents, se plient à une discipline efficace pour nous faire entendre une musique riche en contrastes et en vibrations aussi bien charnelles que spirituelles.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
7 of 11 people found the following review helpful By Paul Brians on October 29, 2008
Verified Purchase
Pluses:

1) The box claims the production was recorded in high-definition. Even though the DVD is not a high-def DVD, it is very detailed and sharp--one of the best pictures I've seen in an opera DVD, done in widescreen format.

2) The music is wonderful, including some folk song adaptations. Very colorful, produced in great stereo sound. At least on my player, it seemed to be two-channel only.

Minuses:

1) The story is chaotic and gloomy, very hard to follow. All the factions involved are either evil or deranged. It's really about the early career of Peter the Great; but he was kept offstage by imperial censorship, so his story is told through subordinates and enemies. Read a good plot summary from somewhere else before trying to experience this opera.

2) The English subtitles were obviously not written by a native speaker. They are in laughably poor English. It is often difficult to figure out what meaning is intended.

3) Most of the singers are fine, but Elena Zaremba (Marfa) has a severe wobble in this performance that makes it difficult to tell most of the time what notes she is trying to hit.
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Modest Musorgsky is one of the most original, nationalistic composers in all of classical music. He rejected any formal musical training, and based his compositions on the uniqueness of Russian speech, and his innate feel for Russian folk music, song, melody and harmonics. Along with Rimsky-Korsakov and Borodin, and others, he formed a group of musicians (only Rimsky-Korsakov had full musical training) that sought to invigorate Russian classical music with the human folk idiom. And none did it as thoroughly as he did.

Unfortunately, the lack of such formal musical education has its consequences. Among them are disorganization, incompleteness, and lack of discipline. So, when he died of alcoholism at the age of only 42, most of his major works, OTHER than his songs, were left unfinished- often in a very scattered condition. "Khovanshchina" is one of those.

Essentially, he wrote this opera as a series of scenes, rather than a straight narrative. Musorgsky didn't like to work from a full libretto, so he wrote the lyrics as he composed the piece. So, well into its composition, Khovanshchina never really coalesced into a complete work. Late he was persuaded to organize the material which he did in something called the "blue notebook", which put the pieces in the order in which he intended them to be. But, he never orchestrated the work at all (other than two small sections) at the time he died.

It was once again left to Rimsky-Korsakov to take it up, organize it, edit it, and orchestrate it into an opera that could be performed. (He had done this also with "Boris Godunov" and with "Prince Igor" by Borodin.) Apparently, this finalization was heavily criticized later, and Dmitri Shostakovich undertook to re-orchestrate and re-organize the piece.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Forums

There are no discussions about this product yet.
Be the first to discuss this product with the community.
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in