|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4 Reviews
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
If you're not afraid, you're not paying attention,
This review is from: Muzzling a Movement: The Effects of Anti-Terrorism Law, Money, and Politics on Animal Activism (Paperback)
Animal advocates of all stripes won't want to miss this slim, but eye-opening, volume. At first, I surmised Muzzling a Movement would not contain information particularly applicable to my life as a quiet, law-abiding, letter-writing activist. The author clearly makes the case that some industries and government agencies are painting all activists with the same broad brush, and they may not be pleased until all are silenced--from the militant to the mainstream.
Early on, the author gives a brief roundup of the many ways animals are used and abused in modern society. This will be nothing new to animal advocates, but to newcomers it will give an idea as to why some people dedicate their lives to helping other beings. I was pleased to see the author seems to be a part of the movement itself; I felt I was speaking with a knowledgeable peer instead of an "outsider looking in," as in some other animal rights law books. The rest of the book is mostly dedicated to the federal Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA) and its predecessors, and the law's effects on animal activists and organizations. Of most interest to me was the author's meticulous reporting on the various Congressional hearings on the animal rights and environmental movements. (I had no idea they cared about us so much!) Perhaps not surprisingly, the government's main targets are those activists who act outside the law. However, it soon becomes clear that legislators are out to attack even the most mainstream humane organizations. And why not? Lovitz outlines the huge campaign contributions animal-use industries bestow upon the lawmakers who spew the most vitriol against animal protection. Unimaginable profits are at stake. I'm still not fully convinced of Lovitz's contention that the animal rights movement has been effectively "muzzled." American animal protection groups are the most supported, most effective, and most high-profile in the world. Animal abuse industries of course want to see that changed, so that's why it's so important to keep a close watch on their political and PR maneuverings. As I closed this book, an old phrase came to mind: "If you're not afraid, you're not paying attention."
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Essential reading for anyone with a conscience!,
By Brett (IL) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Muzzling a Movement: The Effects of Anti-Terrorism Law, Money, and Politics on Animal Activism (Paperback)
This well written book tells about how the federal government is trying to stop the activities of animal activists by labeling them as terrorists. Is there a connection between liberating a puppy from an animal testing laboratory and crashing an airplane into the WTC? According to the feds, both are terrorists. This book is an eye opening read about how the activities of animal activists have been severely restricted since 9/11.
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent, well-researched book!,
This review is from: Muzzling a Movement: The Effects of Anti-Terrorism Law, Money, and Politics on Animal Activism (Paperback)
Ms. Lovitz did an outstanding job of researching, analyzing, and synthesizing the evidence relating to the governmental and media role in chilling animal rights activism. The book is eye-opening and well-written. I highly recommend it for anyone who is concerned about animals or who simply values his/her First Amendment rights.
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent and Important Work,
This review is from: Muzzling a Movement: The Effects of Anti-Terrorism Law, Money, and Politics on Animal Activism (Paperback)
A must read for animal rights or welfare and environmental activists, as well as anyone who cares about constitutional rights, particularly free speech. How can we achieve social change if the government chooses unpopular messages to target for harsher criminal laws? Why is it worse to commit arson in pursuit of environmental justice than it is out of pure spite? Though no doubt arson should be criminal, why are certain activists being targeted for harsher punishment?
But beyond that, what impact do these terrorist labels have on non-violent and lawful activism? And might you be doing something that you thought fell within legal free speech that is grasped by the AETA or a state version of the same? That's the really scary part. This is a quick, but empowering read. The seasoned animal activist can breeze through some of the initial discussion, which is designed to provide helpful background to people who aren't as in tune with the animal rights and welfare movements and the animal exploitation that drives them. Buy a copy now, or ask your library to carry it (or both). This is an important and insightful assessment of the impact of anti-terrorism laws on domestic activism. |
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
Muzzling a Movement: The Effects of Anti-Terrorism Law, Money, and Politics on Animal Activism by Dara Lovitz
$20.00 $9.99
| ||