7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
About more than men... also the relationships and society which shape them and they it, October 28, 2008
This review is from: My Brother's Keeper: What the Social Sciences Do (and Don't) Tell Us About Masculinity (Paperback)
This is a scientific but highly readable (quick) and profound evaluation of masculinity. However, because masculinity is relational, it is also an evaluation of marriage, parenting, business practices, and economics. I have some quibbles with it (I will get to a few), but I wish every pastor and engaged couple would read it. She assumes an egalitarian standpoint but also attempts to reach across the aisle.
Van Leeuwen presents a compelling vision of how a fallen version of a male honor code has permeated so many cultures, including ours, to the detriment of BOTH men and women (and boys and girls). I found myself crying for men at times and the pressures on them. A lot is stuff I've "known" as someone who has pondered and even written about these issues a lot, but I have a fuller perspective on and deeper conviction of that "knowing" after reading this.
One of the most breathtaking moments was when she returned to one culture she had repeatedly evaluated for its detrimental patriarchal behaviors (for instance, female circumcision of both the clitoris AND the labia), the Masai, and showed what happened when Christ came to town. I don't want to spoil it, but it is a story you do NOT want to miss. I'm sure the Masai will continue to struggle with the reassertion of patriarchy in their churches and any remnant pieces, but Christ is indeed good news for women everywhere! (On the topic of the reassertion of patriarchy after breakthroughs in our Western Church, please see Discovering Biblical Equality, Pierce and Groothius, eds. chpts 1 and especially 2.)
In the latter third of the book, Van Leeuwen argues for several changes in society and business (and our thinking) which might allow mothers and fathers of young children to work 30 hrs/wk apiece and evenly divide childcare and housework responsibilities. (Throughout the entire book, she gives scientific, historical, and cultural reasoning for the reintroduction of far more profound father-involvement than almost any American families know today as well as the benefit of women living multi-sphered but not overextended lives, although she delves into that on fewer levels, given the book's emphasis.) She points to a season when Kellogg factories did this much to the advantage of all and some of the societal influences and pressures of male (and female) identity which crept in and overturned this practice. She notes other countries which have moved in this direction as well, for instance with shorter work weeks in general, paternity leaves, etc. It is a wholly compelling case. She also provides suggested safeguards so that women in divorce are not so unevenly and devastatingly impoverished.
YET.... This is where I wish she would have painted more diverse pictures that could better suit more subcultures within the U.S. and the unique diversity of callings that any given couple will find on their lives. Understandably, since she is working so much w/in scientific studies, she may not have tackled it for lack of studies. But as a reader, I would have liked it if she nonetheless wandered the paths in wonderment.
To her credit, she does suggest that some might want to divvy it up a little differently and notes, "A genuine social partnership between men and women will allow for specialization by gender and by life-cycle stage for those who mutually wish it and agree to it. But such specialization should not result in either sex's becoming materially or psychologically vulnerable, socially isolated or permanently closed off from other avenues of growth and service." This important caveat deserves FAR more exploration than these two sentences serve (the most in specifics she came up with earlier was that one parent might work 35-40 hrs and one 20-25 for a season). I can see too many reading this book and throwing their hands up when they get to her final solution. Or they might feel guilty if they either simply cannot find or do not feel called to a 30/30 scenario.
For instance, I live in an area where the women with higher educations are very few and far between. Indeed, not that many of the men are educated, but the army and various muscle-bound jobs that not too many women can do give them a means of ready income. The women's ability to contribute as much financially would be thus hampered. Plus, even if all of these arguments were to be accessibly presented to the couples here, very few women here, I think, would sign up as this being at all what they want. The teens here express near constant jealousy of the young moms. And many marry right out of high school. It is their general desire and horizon, if culturally mediated. The turning of that and the availability of other possibilities would be a gradual thing here and not to be desired in the eyes of many.
SO it would be great to come up with some game-plans to work toward health of gender identities in this context, limits on the tyrannt of economics, and ways in which women who do choose (and who may very well be called) to be primarily guardians of the homefront might nonetheless find (with a husband's support as he takes on more housework and childcare and affirms her) a public role of service, life-giving hobbies, and/or some gradual education that would enable them to enter another stage of life later on as they find desire.
One side-note is that in her book I stumbled upon scientific evidence of the totally uneven toll on Christian marriages experienced in the oh-so-patriarchical corner of the country in which I live: the buckle of the Bible belt. I had observed the divorce rate and so on and made the correlations within my small circles but had not seen such a study.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Another Thought-Provoking Book by Van Leeuwen, November 8, 2004
This review is from: My Brother's Keeper: What the Social Sciences Do (and Don't) Tell Us About Masculinity (Paperback)
She does it yet again! I really enjoyed an egalitarians viewpoint on masculinity in this century. It also made me realise how hugely important of a role my husband plays in my daughters life. It is scholarly, yet readable. An overview of masculinity in through the centuries and what affect that has on todays perception of what masculinity is. She has two sons, is a egalitarian and a very intelligent woman both as a scholar and from her personal experience.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No