This movie was recommended to me as one that is highly critical of Orthodox Judaism. One thing is for sure, the criticism is very subtle, and this might be the lamest softball attack on the ultra-orthodox world that I have seen or read.
The interaction of the three main characters (Rabbi, wife, and son) is absolutely beautiful, incredible. This movie to me is an advertisement for having a religious family. If David Volach told me this was his secret motive of the film, I would believe him.
A 9-10 year old kid is not equipped to deal with the deeper philosophical questions in life. No responsible father whether he was Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, or Muslim would rock the boat and open up a venue for religious debate with his young, fragile, impressionable young boy. Suicide bombing is not a problem in the Jewish world, so parents can usually count on having these deeper, philosophical discussions about the meaning of life with their children after the ages of 17-18.
The scene where the son is put in a position to possibly drown is a very, very hard sell. It is very hard to believe that a rabbi is going to leave his son unattended in such a way. Even if this was a true story, it is disingenuous to project the actions of one errant father on the entire ultra-orthodox community.
It is also hard to believe that it would take 5 minutes for a kid to put on his sandle, whereby the father would lose patience and go pray on his own. Thus leaving an opening for the young boy to hop in the Dead Sea completely by himself and drown (a sea that everyone floats on).
The director clearly has an axe to grind with the Jewish People, specifically the ultra-orthodox world.
I think anyone who finds this movie to be a strong attack on the ultra-orthodoxy should reexamine their prejudices, cultural understanding and historical knowledge of the Jewish People.
If someone is going to criticize religion, at least do so with real ammunition (e.g. Richard Dawkins, Karen Armstrong, or Christopher Hitchens). Dawkins specifically fires live ammunition with his rabid Atheism. Volach's attempt amounted to throwing wiffle softballs at best.
Lastly, it is offensive that anyone would think a dog, a cat, or any other animal is equivalent to a human being. I am an animal lover, but they clearly are not living with the same level of intelligence, self-control, and Divine purpose as human beings.
I personally know very little about the Jewish faith, but it seems peculiar that Volach did not elaborate on the well-known fact that Judaism believes animals do in fact have souls, a nefesh. Humans have an animal soul (nefesh) and a human soul (neshama). This was a major omission, but did not fit into Volach's agenda.
I give this movie three stars for its accurate portrayal of the beauty and sanctity of Jewish religious life.