Customer Reviews

The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS: How a Tragedy Has Been Distorted by the Media and Partisan Politics

5 star:		(18)
4 star:		(1)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(5)

 

 

Good grief, look at the lame objections to Fumento's book. He never said heterosexuals *couldn't* get AIDS, just that they were nowhere near as likely to get it as the classic risk groups. Is there something wrong with acknowledging this?

Is his message one of tolerance for heterosexual promiscuity? No. He points out that the places where it is widely associated with heterosexual sex are places where one or more of the following are true: 1) Heavy sanctions against homosexuality impel sufferers to deny their true activity; 2) Rampant promiscuity has led to rampant VD, causing lesions which encourage the blood-to-body-fluid contact needed for AIDS transmission and concentrating the disease in prostitutes; and 3) because of severe shortages, medical professionals reuse needles themselves, effectively giving their patients the AIDS transmission rates associated with intravenous drug abusers.

In IL there was once a requirement for an AIDS test before issuing a marriage license, but after a while it was dropped because there were so many false positives on the test relative to the actual incidence in couples about to get married.

In the paperback edition I saw, Fumento noted the efforts made by various individuals and groups to suppress his politically incorrect message. I know indirectly, because it took me a couple of years to get my copy of the book back in the early 90's. I didn't succeed until another publisher took it over.

Thank you Mr. Fumento for sticking to your guns. The reviewers who gave this book fewer than three stars to date are just regurgitating a mindless left-wing catechism.

If you are a non-IV drug using heterosexual, this book is simply the single best resource on HIV and AIDS available to you. The author is the first Ive ever read who is able to accurately interpret the statistics involved. He is also able to take important scientific findings, such as the issues regarding "virul load" and make them understandable to the lay person. His arguments are cogent and well documented and, best of all, the past eight years have proven them correct, from both a scientific and epidemiological standpoint. Very very few books on this issue remain in print this long. There is a reason this one has. If you fear this disease, this is the book to help you determine how realistic (or not) your fear is.

This is one of the most important books of the 1990s. It changed my life, and can change yours, too.

AIDS has afflicted gay men and hemophiliacs in numbers which are wildly disproportionate compared to their total numbers in the population. To ignore the facts, and pretend that all people who engage in any kind of sexual activity are equally at risk, is to encourage those in high-risk groups to engage in more risky behavior, and is thereby doing them a great, great disservice which invariably costs many more lives.

Before you buy into the PC hype, you would do well to consult the CDC's own data, which was a major information source for this book.

AIDS is indeed a great tragedy, which is why it's so important that we be honest about it and ignore the PC hysteria.

Michael Fumento had a thankless task in writing this book, for which he has mostly received scorn, and even lost his job at one point. Regardless, thank Whatever that something possessed him to write it, for we can all benefit from this courageous work.

In the early days of the epidemic, it was rational to worry that AIDS might 'explode through the general population.' Once the HIV virus was isolated, and a little known about how it spread, it became obvious that it just wasn't possible.

Back in 1987, Michael Fumento wrote an article in Commentary which told why the general heterosexual population was not at signifigant risk for AIDS. He thought everyone would be glad to know that tens of millions of USAmericans would NOT die of an incurable disease associated with incredible suffering.

Wrong.

Lots of people wanted everyone at risk, or, at least, wanted everyone to believe that everyone was at risk, regardless of whether or not it was true. Fumento was denounced, harassed, and, lied about for stating that most AIDS victims would continue to be male homosexuals, IV drug users, women in a long term relationship with men in the first two groups, and children of women with HIV.

The terrible thing is, that, by saying "Everyone is equally at risk," those at high risk didn't get the information they needed to protect themselves. Thousands died in the U.S. because they were deliberately misinformed about AIDS by those with political agendas to push -- agendas they weren't willing to argue for honestly.

Thirteen years later, the story continues. Very few cases of AIDS are contracted heterosexually, except for the women sleeping regularly with bisexuals and drug users, and Fumento continues to be denounced. Even people whom came to agree with him, such as Gabriel Rotello, felt it necessary to say nasty things about him -- things that weren't true, by the way. And those whom WANT heterosexuals to be at high risk for AIDS continue to claim Fumento was wrong, as you can see by looking at some other reviews on this page.

The one thing you won't see is facts to back up their assertions, for the simple reason that there are none.

Read this book if you want a fascinating account of how the truth about a terrible disease was surpressed. And check out Fumento.com to find out the latest lies being spread about AIDS -- but only if you value the truth above political correctness.

Fumento, Gordon Stewart, and others who disputed that HIV would be a pandemic in the general heterosexual population have finally been vindicated. The independent published an article a few weeks ago about how the threat of a heterosexual epidemic is over. It is obvious that AIDS is far from the disaster that was forecast in the 1st world countries. It has confided itself to the so-called trash can of society - junkies,homosexuals,whores, and Johns. As far as Africa proving the heterosexual epidemic that is rubbish. "AIDS" in Africa is the relabeling of old diseases. Africans need nutritious food, clean drinking water, medications for endemic diseases, and other basics, not condoms and "partner reduction". I dare anyone to visit the disease ridden slums of Africa. Sex is the last thing on peoples minds there!

If you have adjusted your social life out of a fear of contracting AIDS, you need to read this book. Fumento's thesis is correct. His arguments are fairly compelling (although I read the book long after reaching the same conclusion regarding heterosexual AIDS) and comprehensible by laypersons. The writing is merely average, and Fumento is a little too self-congratulatory and arrogant at times, which is annoying. Still, it takes a lot of intelligence or common sense to recognize that heterosexual AIDS was and is a myth, and I give him credit for that. Given the anxiety (and lost opportunities) that AIDS-phobia has caused young people in the U.S., this book must be considered a public service, and Fumento is to be commended for putting it before the public. Despite the fact that the writing is pedestrian, the mere fact that Fumento's thesis is correct -- though contrary to public belief even now in 1998 -- justifies a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

The review from Library Journal that is so disparaging was written by James E. Van Buskirk, a gay librarian from San Francisco who contributed an article titled, "Queer Career" for a book edited by Norman G. Kester entitled, Liberating Minds: The Stories and Professional Lives of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Librarians and Their Advocates. Here is a quote from that article by Buskirk - concerning being asked to review gay and lesbian titles by Library Journal - that illustrates why he is unfit to provide a review for any books about AIDS that don't toe the party line:

"I quickly realized that I had the potential to influence the acquisition of lesbian and gay materials by librarians all over the country. I took this position seriously and have continued to try to word my reviews so that librarians would be encouraged to acquire deserving titles for their collection"

Clearly Van Buskirk has taken that job too seriously and is now wording his reviews in such a way to discourage book buyers from titles he finds unpalatable. Van Buskirk accuses Fumento of an "insidiously homophobic, flippant style" something I'm sure he would accuse any author of who doesn't agree with the gay and lesbian polemic concerning AIDS funding. Anyone who has read the book or knows Fumento is well aware that Fumento is anything but "homophobic". This is a man that was an AIDS analyst and attorney for the US Commission on Human Rights. Nothing in his life or work has ever suggested that he is homophobic. I wonder if individuals in the gay and lesbian community are aware that hurling the accusation of homophobia has utterly and completely lost any meaning, because it is leveled at anyone that disagree with their position(s)? The bottom line is, Van Buskirk owes Fumento an apology for this accusation and Library Journal should immediately retract this review.

Van Buskirk concludes in his review that Fumento's "argument is contradicted by the continuing spread of AIDS among heterosexuals". Time has borne Fumento out to be very correct, as the incidents of AIDS in the heterosexual community has not grown, in fact it has drastically decreased. Cases within the heterosexual community are often the result of IV drug usage or sex with said. Fumento's book can now be said to be uncannily prophetic and accurate in the extreme, while Van Buskirk was wrong in more ways than one.

Revision: Last paragraph deleted 9/29/03 (too many words)

The Author: Every now and then a person comes along who lives a passion for finding and sharing truth. He is not satisfied with merely being well-fed and lying as needed to optimize his professional stature. He takes the risks, endures the persecution and keeps on fighting. Such is Michael Fumento.

The Book: It would take no less than Fumento's 463 pages (with 47 pages of references and notes) to unravel over a decade of lies emanating from the practitioners of AIDS-transmitting behaviors, the media, and the most visible public health professionals. I can see that there is still a need for this message today when I talk with misled others, when I see misleading public transit AIDS ads and when I hear the news.

Values: If I went into this book looking for a gay-bashing tirade I would not find it. If I approached it with the attitude of (some) Christians that homosexuals deserve to die because of their behavior, I would not find any support from Fumento. If I went into this book feeling 100% not responsible for the spread of this disease I would encounter explanation that we are all responsible at least indirectly because of our ignorance, gullibility and tolerance of shabby news-reporting. What is this guy's agenda, anyway? Fumento could just as easily have chosen issues other than AIDS (and he has done this in other articles and books) to further his agenda, which seems to be to expose the misdeeds of alarmists, the media and health professionals who have abused perfectly good science as they furthered their own careers at the expense of victims of disease and ignorance.

Educational Value: I recommend this book for enhancing one's practical and logical understanding of: AIDS transmission physiology and psychology; AIDS-enabling co-morbidity; epidemiology; statistics; public health systems; the media; and news analysis. Also, one can learn numerous well-documented, less-promoted facts about AIDS. And by studying the behaviors of some public health officials one might identify morality conflicts for some of his own potential career choices.

Reading Level and Data: Sometimes I had to re-read paragraphs because some of the logic and statistical thinking was new to me. But, a thorough grasp of statistics in epidemiology is not essential. After all, how much sophistication does it take to understand Fumento's copiously explained statements (abbreviated here): that receptive anal intercourse (for men or women) is by far the most AIDS-risky sexual behavior; or that early homosexual AIDS victims each averaged almost 1100 lifetime partners (1 survey); or that among heterosexuals it is overwhelmingly the partners of intravenous drug abusers (IVDA) who are at highest risk; or that blood-transfusion-infected heterosexuals often required years, with regular intercourse, to infect their wives; or that female prostitutes in the United States do little to spread AIDS, but do sometimes acquire it from pimps or boyfriends; or that there is increased risk in vaginal intercourse if women are menstruating, have an infection or have another STD; or that in heterosexual lifestyles it is the character of, not the number of sexual partners that determines a woman's AIDS risk; or that about ten times as many native-born American males are diagnosed with breast cancer each year as are diagnosed with AIDS from heterosexual intercourse; or that there are also major differences in AIDS transmission rates depending on gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status and inner-city vs. suburban living, or that in 1993 AIDS was continuing to receive about 20 times as much per death as cancer in federal research and education dollars?

Why Read About AIDS? I believe that, there is a learning obligation for the lucky ones who do not get AIDS. For example, if everyone whose relative or loved one got AIDS were to broadly self-educate about AIDS, there would be a great reduction of suffering in the land - because victims would be better understood, because solutions could more likely be found, and because it would create "public supervision" of public health officials, activists, authors and the media. While Fumento does not dwell on the horrors of the AIDS illness, he does explain how those horrors have been imparted to (probably) thousands of excess persons in this country because funds had been diverted from categories of persons who were known to be at highest risk, and had been invested instead on those known to be at extremely low risk. But this was after huge waste in paying for professional salaries and media campaigns.

What about Africa? Anyone who doubts any significant heterosexual AIDS prevalence in the USA (aside from that of partners of IVDA) is asked why we hear of a large heterosexual AIDS prevalence in Africa. Fumento explains: 1) Part of the African AIDS prevalence actually is from lied-about male homosexual behaviors. 2) There are rampant malaria, STD's and other diseases which have already weakened immune systems, increasing AIDS vulnerability. 3) There is severe limitation on the availability of health care and medications. 4) During earlier phases of the epidemic there was no money to pay for the testing of donated blood or for eliminating re-use of needles in hospitals. 5) Prostitutes with STD's can't get medical treatment. 6) Africa has a few high-prevalence AIDS regions just as the USA does - but the media has tended to report a high prevalence over broad regions of Africa.

Hate crimes: At least in the 1980's and early 1990's, homosexual activists, some public health professionals and the media vigorously promoted exaggerations of AIDS prevalence and predictions, with some even "foreseeing" the demise of the civilization. Given that some of the public actually believed these exaggerations and also saw through the lies of the media which denied the predominance of homosexual behavior and intravenous drug abuse in AIDS causation, it is surprising there was not more violence.

Facts explaining why the obviously absent AIDS epidemic has NOT reached the proportions which we were led to believe. An amazing preface explaining the route this manuscript took from typewriter through publication to the bookshelf. Even if you don't believe it you should read what the PC's are foisting upon us,

Michael Fumento is one of those quite rare people who sees reality clearly and does not have the propensity to assume that the media crowd, who seem to be monolithic in their belief system concering the causes of AIDS.

Obvious groups had/have a vested interest in confusing (lying)
about the main predisposing factors which lead to contracting the disease.

The result was and is that many people who could have avoided becoming infected with HIV/AIDS were infected and frequently died due to commonly held assumptions.

Fumento had considerable courage by bucking "the establishment" and the "experts." When his book was published, many bookstores would not display it.

It is quite difficult to maintain your honesty and integrity and survive. To be concise, Fumento was/is a whistle blower on a global scale. Bravo!