Was the Confederacy doomed from the start in its struggle against the superior might of the Union? Did its forces fight heroically against all odds for the cause of states’ rights? In reality, these suggestions are an elaborate and intentional effort on the part of Southerners to rationalize the secession and the war itself. Unfortunately, skillful propagandists have been so successful in promoting this romanticized view that the Lost Cause has assumed a life of its own. Misrepresenting the war’s true origins and its actual course, the myth of the Lost Cause distorts our national memory. In The Myth of the Lost Cause and Civil War History, nine historians describe and analyze the Lost Cause, identifying ways in which it falsifies history—creating a volume that makes a significant contribution to Civil War historiography.
The Myth of the Lost Cause and Civil War History
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Browse our Bookshelf Favorites store for big savings on popular fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and more. |
Book Description
Frequently Bought Together
Editorial Reviews
From Booklist
The South lost the Civil War, but southerners have certainly held their own in the postwar battle to shape historical interpretations of the conflict. Southern politicians, war veterans, and historians successfully promoted the "Lost Cause" view of the origins and results of our national nightmare. The South, so the story goes, wanted to preserve its unique culture, and slavery was not a fundamental basis of that culture. Led by valiant gentlemen-officers (e.g., Robert E. Lee) and brave, defiant common soldiers, the Confederacy struggled against insurmountable odds, eventually succumbing to numerically but not morally superior forces. This collection of essays by nine Civil War scholars shows how the myth was consciously propagated by southerners, often in an attempt to rationalize the physical and social carnage left by the war. These essays are well reasoned and timely, given current controversies raging over the display of the Confederate battle flag. This will be a valuable addition to Civil War collections. Jay Freeman
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Review
"The Lost Cause... is a tangible and influential phenomenon in American culture and this book provides an excellent source for anyone seeking to explore its various dimensions." —Southern Historian
(Southern Historian )"Well reasoned and timely." —Booklist
(Booklist )
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
More About the Author
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.
Customer Reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
27 of 29 people found the following review helpful
By E. Payne
Format:Hardcover
Well, the neo-Confederates are out in force condemning this collection of essays. It seems well to note that Southerners did a very good job of capturing the high ground from which Americans viewed Civil War history for nearly a century. Even though I'm a native Mississippian, I've never understood those who claim that the war was not about slavery. On the contrary, it had everything to do with slavery. The Mississippi declaration of secession began by noting "Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery..." That seems pretty straight forward to me. Reasonable people can argue about whether secession was, in the strict legal sense, constitutional. And it can be pointed out that while Lincoln made strong use of slave-owner Thomas Jefferson's assertion that "all men are created equal" that ideal is taken from the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution. But right up until the first shots were fired, arguments about constitutional powers, sectional differences, and property rights were all framed within the context of a dispute over the institution of slavery.
This collection contains several interesting essays, some weaker ones, and one misfire. Unfortunately, the misfire leads off the collection: Alan T. Nolan's "Anatomy of the myth." While Mr. Nolan accurately summarizes key feature of Lost Cause historiography, his tone is needlessly shrill. It seems silly to have to point out that "Gone with the wind"--both book and movie--are works of fiction. They were widely embraced by a white American populous of the 1930s seeking an escapist depiction of a romantic past in the midst of the Great Depression. Focusing on GWTW as a flawed depiction of historical events is about as useless as doing the same with "Braveheart" or the latest "Robin Hood." It is a shame that Gary Gallagher, co-editor of the collection along with Mr. Nolan, did not advise his colleague to do a re-write with a cooler head and sharper focus.
On the other hand, Mr. Gallagher's essay on Jubal Early is much more balanced and instructive. Early, a Confederate general, sought to move the Southern struggle from the battlefield to the printed page. He and his followers managed to influence not only Southern perceptions but, in time, Northern views as well. Robert E. Lee, after all, did not become an American icon by accident. Also of interest is the essay on Wade Hampton by Charles Holden. Far from attacking Hampton, Holden paints a nuanced portrait of the former Confederate officer who evolved into racial moderate in the postwar period (within the context of the times) only to be pushed aside by the politically inspired race-baiting of Ben Tillman. And there is a fine essay by Jeffry Wert on Gen. James Longstreet, the man whose reluctant performance at Gettysburg, postwar political alliances, and criticism of Lee made him an ideal scapegoat.
Somewhat less successful, in my view, is the essay by Brooks Simpson dealing with Gen. U.S. Grant's reputation as winning his campaign against Lee by means of brutal attrition alone. Whatever one's view of Lee as a man, in the period of 1862-3 he was the most audacious of military leaders. But this very audaciousness produced losses that, by 1864, forced him into a much more conservative strategy. The Lee who Grant confronted in 1864 was not the same Lee his predecessors had faced. Thus it is disappointing that Simpson lets stand without discussion Grant's characterization of Lee as not being a formidable opponent. And given that Grant himself had been rather audacious in the western theater, there is the question of whether--once in the shadow of Washington DC and tied to the ponderous Army of the Potomac--he could have realistically engaged in the sort of strategic risks that Sherman took in Georgia.
Considered as a whole, however, this set of essays has merit for those with a judicious view of history (e.g., that the Civil War might have involved a dispute over slavery) and a desire to learn how such views can sometimes be shaped by the losing side.
This collection contains several interesting essays, some weaker ones, and one misfire. Unfortunately, the misfire leads off the collection: Alan T. Nolan's "Anatomy of the myth." While Mr. Nolan accurately summarizes key feature of Lost Cause historiography, his tone is needlessly shrill. It seems silly to have to point out that "Gone with the wind"--both book and movie--are works of fiction. They were widely embraced by a white American populous of the 1930s seeking an escapist depiction of a romantic past in the midst of the Great Depression. Focusing on GWTW as a flawed depiction of historical events is about as useless as doing the same with "Braveheart" or the latest "Robin Hood." It is a shame that Gary Gallagher, co-editor of the collection along with Mr. Nolan, did not advise his colleague to do a re-write with a cooler head and sharper focus.
On the other hand, Mr. Gallagher's essay on Jubal Early is much more balanced and instructive. Early, a Confederate general, sought to move the Southern struggle from the battlefield to the printed page. He and his followers managed to influence not only Southern perceptions but, in time, Northern views as well. Robert E. Lee, after all, did not become an American icon by accident. Also of interest is the essay on Wade Hampton by Charles Holden. Far from attacking Hampton, Holden paints a nuanced portrait of the former Confederate officer who evolved into racial moderate in the postwar period (within the context of the times) only to be pushed aside by the politically inspired race-baiting of Ben Tillman. And there is a fine essay by Jeffry Wert on Gen. James Longstreet, the man whose reluctant performance at Gettysburg, postwar political alliances, and criticism of Lee made him an ideal scapegoat.
Somewhat less successful, in my view, is the essay by Brooks Simpson dealing with Gen. U.S. Grant's reputation as winning his campaign against Lee by means of brutal attrition alone. Whatever one's view of Lee as a man, in the period of 1862-3 he was the most audacious of military leaders. But this very audaciousness produced losses that, by 1864, forced him into a much more conservative strategy. The Lee who Grant confronted in 1864 was not the same Lee his predecessors had faced. Thus it is disappointing that Simpson lets stand without discussion Grant's characterization of Lee as not being a formidable opponent. And given that Grant himself had been rather audacious in the western theater, there is the question of whether--once in the shadow of Washington DC and tied to the ponderous Army of the Potomac--he could have realistically engaged in the sort of strategic risks that Sherman took in Georgia.
Considered as a whole, however, this set of essays has merit for those with a judicious view of history (e.g., that the Civil War might have involved a dispute over slavery) and a desire to learn how such views can sometimes be shaped by the losing side.
53 of 66 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
Having just finished this book, I see why some of the essays have caused some controversy. It takes a hard look at the facts of the war, versus what has been presented as accurate history by many Southern leaders and writers. Simply put, some of the authors openly question many commonly held views, particularly those proposed by people interested in justifying the South's loss, or reasons for leaving the Union.
Overall, the essays are solid: some great, some good, and a few are only okay. I found Alan Nolan's, Gary Gallagher's, and Jeffrey Wert's essays to be most compelling. They are all well written, researched, and argued. Also, the topics they cover are interesting. Although I do not agree with Alan Nolan's low opinion of General Lee as a soldier, the rest of his essay takes many of the myths of the "Lost Cause" head-on, and dispells them convincinly.
Two of the essays I did not find very exciting: Keith Bohannon's, or Charles Holden's. The topic were too narrow for my taste. The other essays are all good, and helped add to my understanding of the war.
I recommend this book to anyone who is a Civil War "buff", or student of the war. If you think that the war was not fought over slavery, but only states rights, you should explore the discussion of this topic in numerous essays.
46 of 64 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
I do not claim to be an expert on the Civil War, but I have always had a great interest in the events leading up to the war, and still think The Impending Crisis 1848-1861, by David M. Potter completed by Don E. Fehrenbacher (which book I finished reading May 15, 1976) is the best book on that era. I greatly enjoyed the essays in this book, and I agree that the best of the nine is Alan T. Nolan's "The Anatomy of the Myth." He effectually annihilates arguments of neo-Confederates, especially the one that secession was not about slavery. Anyone interested in Southern history should read this book.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars
Reality and Perspective
The South's long and intense effort to salvage its self-image by rewriting the history of the Civil War is understandable but has become tiresome. Read more
Published 16 months ago by Dave B
4.0 out of 5 stars
Table of Contents
I enjoyed this book very much. Nolan's essay is more or less a second introduction, stating, but not examining the elements of the myth. Read more
Published 18 months ago by Elizabeth A. Root
5.0 out of 5 stars
This topic is still current today.
I had always wondered how the causes of the Civil War had been sanitized and subjected to spin - this is thorough and authoritative. Read more
Published on April 23, 2011 by Bill Simon
2.0 out of 5 stars
History or Prejudice?
The Myth of the Lost Cause and Civil War History provides a platform for yet another rehashing the age old thesis of Southern "Devil Theory" so popular in bygone decades. Read more
Published on November 24, 2010 by jackson Butterworth
1.0 out of 5 stars
Pure fiction
Modern historians who are the intellectual descendants of Alexander Hamilton continue to downgrade Jefferson's philosophy of states' rights. Read more
Published on October 19, 2010 by silver dollar
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Lost Cause revisited
The Myth of the Lost Cause and Civil War History, edited by Gary Gallagher, is an excellent collection of essays, illustrating various perspectives on that much debated phenomenon,... Read more
Published on July 14, 2009 by James N. Corbridge
1.0 out of 5 stars
Northern Propaganda Hit Piece
From the first page there is an underlying hostility towards the South. It is a Northern propaganda hit piece and little more.
Published on June 14, 2009 by John N. Badger Jr.
4.0 out of 5 stars
A Very Unusual Subject On "The Lost Cause" Concept
Recommended by another Civil War enthusiast, I bought the book because of it's interesting premise - to refute the rationale of the "Lost Cause" made famous throughout the South... Read more
Published on November 2, 2008 by Gregory J. Baumbach
3.0 out of 5 stars
Not all I had hoped, but some bright spots
I was most interested in the generalship of Grant versus the actual (not glorified) generalship of Lee. Read more
Published on March 25, 2005 by S. A. McNeel
1.0 out of 5 stars
A Terrible Propaganda Piece
The shamelessly teleological approach to research displayed in this book is its most memorable feature. Read more
Published on July 27, 2004 by M. Vance
Citations (learn more)
This book cites 100
books:
See all 100 books this book cites
15
books
cite this book:
See all 15 books citing this book
- The Lost Cause the Standard Southern History of the War of the Confederates by Edward A. Pollard on 8 pages
- Army of the Potomac (The Civil War Library) by William Swinton on 7 pages
- Campaigns Of The Army Of The Potomac by William Swinton on 5 pages
- Four Years with General Lee by Walter Taylor on 4 pages
- From Manassas to Appomattox: General James Longstreet by General James Longstreet on 4 pages
See all 100 books this book cites
- Sphinx on the American Land: The Nineteenth-Century South in Comparative Perspective (Walter Lynwood Fleming Lectures in Southern History) by Peter Kolchin on page 70, and page 93
- Virginia's Civil War by Professor Peter Wallenstein on page 42, and page 268
- The Memory of the Civil War in American Culture (Civil War America) by Alice Fahs on page 34, and page 61
- Facing America: Iconography and the Civil War by Shirley Samuels in Back Matter
- The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War by Thomas DiLorenzo in Back Matter
See all 15 books citing this book
Books on Related Topics
(learn more)
|
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Listmania!
|
|
