74 of 83 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Generally Misunderstood, August 24, 2005
This review is from: The Myth of Matriarchal Prehistory: Why an Invented Past Won't Give Women a Future (Paperback)
It seems that there has been a lot of recent confusion about Dr. Eller's books, "The Myth of Matriarchal Prehistory" in both its stated objective as well as its scientific accomplishment. This short review is an attempt to rectify and refute any such questions posed by reviewers who didn't seem to understand the aims of this work.
Firstly, it must be understood that Dr. Eller was not out to prove that prehistory was in any way universally patriarchal. Dr. Eller is certainly aware of the many matriarchal, matrilineal and matrifocal prehistorical societies. Rather, this book is an attempt to disprove the "Universal Matriarchy" theory presented by many authors who lack that scholastic ability and scientific methodology to prove or disprove the theory. As such, Dr. Eller doesn't need to address the myriad of "matri" prefixed societies in prehistory, all she needs to do is present a few very well-researched patriarchal societies.
Secondly, Dr. Eller's work is centered around providing solid footing for feminism in the modern context. She seems to believe, and rightly to my thinking, that so long as the majority of spiritual feminist authors rely on unsound claims of a universal matriarchy that they cannot be taken seriously by either the scholastic community or the public at large. By grounding the modern feminist movement in strict scientific methodology, she is attempting to provide a secure footing for further scholarship into the realm of women's studies.
Third and lastly, there also seem to be a lot of attacks, both personal and professional, against Dr. Eller and her work. These often come from the same people who then critique the acidic or condescending tone of her writing style. While objections to her writing style are, of course, the prerogative of the reviewer, accusing Dr. Eller of being mean then attacking her personally and professionally seems hypocritical at best. Though I also found her tone sarcastic, and at times off-putting, this didn't devalue the information presented.
In praise to Dr. Eller's book, many of the reviews already present do great justice. The methodology is sound, the information provocative and the conclusions she comes to are startling. I for one have fond hopes that this book will make great leaps in overcoming the stigma present around scholarly and spiritual feminism both.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
70 of 84 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Informative, scholarly, challenging, iconoclastic., August 5, 2000
The Myth Of Matriarchal Prehistory: Why An Invented Past Won't Give Women A Future examines the evidence for and against the hypothesis of a paleolithic/neolithic matriarchal dominance in human society. Exceptional scholarship combined with articulate writing presents up-to-date archaeologically based commentary scrutinizing the scientific plausibility of matriarch and reveals it to be non-supportive of such a culture. Author and researcher Cynthia Eller goes on to explain why and how the concept of a matriarchal society took root in feminist thought. Eller concludes that the pervasive myth of a prehistorical matriarchy is a continuance of gendered stereotyping. Informative, scholarly, challenging, and iconoclastic, The Myth Of Matriarchal Prehistory is a highly recommended contribution to the fields of cultural anthropology, sociology, and women's studies.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
33 of 39 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
excellent book to get you asking more questions, December 4, 2003
This review is from: The Myth of Matriarchal Prehistory: Why an Invented Past Won't Give Women a Future (Paperback)
Despite what other reviewers have said about her writing being "rubbish" or otherwise unworthy, Cynthia Eller has done a wonderful job with this book. A skeptic from the beginning of all forms of revisionist history, I found this book to be refreshing, even if I didn't agree with it 100% of the time (but what book do you agree with 100% of the time, particularly if you're a religious scholar?).
Far from saying that feminist mythology is somehow imbued with scurrilous intent, she asserts, as many religious scholars have before her, that mythology need not be true. But she doesn't discount its power or relevance. Rather, she makes us question the fervent approach to a mandate of myth as fact in the feminist community, and does so with aplomb.
I enjoyed reading this book as much for the content as for the questions it raised. I highly recommend this book to anyone familiar or unfamiliar with the debate over pre-history, and to every woman involved in goddess spirituality. It's good to have balance and rational thought mixed in with faith, and this book aids in finding that balance.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No