The Clinton administration and the other NATO governments boast that the alliance won a great victory in its war against Yugoslavia.
| |||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
36 of 42 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Bad for Yugoslavia, Bad for the US,
By Phillip Corwin, author Dubious Mandate: A Mem... (New York, NY USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: NATO's Empty Victory (Paperback)
A real gem of an essay collection: articulate, passionate, and in the deepest sense, boldly patriotic. From several different angles, the authors of these essays -- eminently qualified scholars, diplomats, and foreign policy experts -- show why NATO's military aggression against Yugoslavia, under the guise of humanitarian intervention in Kosovo, was bad, very bad, for America's national interest. Here from the introduction, is a brief balance sheet on the Clinton-Albright war of aggression: "In the course of acquiring the dubious role of baby sitter of the Balknas, NATO inflicted enormous suffering on innocent Serbian and Albanian Kosovar civilians; created serious economic and political prolbmes for neighboring Balkan countries, stimulated fears through the world that the democratic West had embarked on a new round of imperialism under a phony banner of humanitarian intervention; further undermined a key provision of the U.S. Constitution; and badly damaged relations with Russian and China."One wonders, after reading these essays, why did the so-called "independent" Western press act as publicist and promoter for US foreign policy? Where were the dissenters? Moroever, these essays suggest that the real dangers in the Balkans are Albanian nationalism and NATO expansionism. Do we want American soldiers sacrificed in foreign wars that have no impact on our national interest -- in fact, undermine out national interest? Read this book!
34 of 40 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
NATO's Empty Victory. It answers "why?".,
This review is from: NATO's Empty Victory: A Postmortem on the Balkan War (Hardcover)
The author's writing style is clear and concise. There is good support in terms of data and comparisons to support the main points. The book addressed my concerns about what is really behind NATO's first ever military actions against a economic third world country that had not attacked nor threatened militarily any of the members of the NATO alliance. I was also curious how NATO justified acting on behalf of the United Nations in spite of a lack of consensus on the part of the Security Council - the book give a convicing explanation. More trouble is ahead in NATO occupied Kosovo. This book can be useful in understanding why. Good reading.
16 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Recommended for NATO and the Balkan War studies.,
By Midwest Book Review (Oregon, WI USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: NATO's Empty Victory (Paperback)
This brief survey of the Balkan War challenges the notion that NATO had waged a successful campaign against genocide, showing how the Kosovo Liberation Army is still a threat and considering how the war actually damaged relationships between major world powers. Recommended for any in-depth study of the Balkan War or Nato.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|